Separate names with a comma.
sometimes i wish he didn't put so much air under it. i think he was taught to do that by one of his coaches in the past... last year the packers...
that was one play where the receiver had a step (more like a quarter step) and Favre underthrew him. still, even if it was a near perfect pass...
he threw two today that were good. they weren't completed but they were right there (for cotch)
hopefully next week
i hate comparing the jets' receivers to Favre's old ones... but really you could name a ton of receivers who could've caught those
Coles is seriously terrible at catching deep balls
ummm he had Cotch twice deep but Cotch just didnt' come down with the ball. not favre's fault there.. you expect ur WR to come down with those
this is true. ppl always bring up sacks and say we're one of the best at pass pressure. obviously thats not true
well if cotch didnt slow down he probably would've caught it. not such a waste then..
we do have glaring holes in the team. obviously pass rush, pass coverage. no deep threat... cotch had two tries today but couldn't get either of...
have you ever heard of the word irony?
they've had games where they've played extremely well, especially san diego and oakland. should mike fisher be fired cuz he lost to the "lowly" jets
whatever at least wait til the games over to bitch about everything it's not our worst game yet. im still confident we can win, unlike some other...
u guys need to stop flip flopping
not as dumb as you think. but u should almost always rush at least 4 guys..
so you're fine with what LC said?
from reading the posted quotes it sounds pretty bad on LC's part.
kinda difficult but if you can kick and you didn't play in high school or college then u can be eligible and it's def makeable
Favre is definitely one of the best of all time at avoiding sacks. But to be honest, he hasn't really shown that this year so much..
see, stuff like the "force-out" last year should be reviewable. same with the "cotch fumble". what's the point of the video review if many crucial...
