Separate names with a comma.
they had a good all around team, they had a great O and a good D. Unfortunately in postseason the great O become an average O. the year they won...
I understand the point, I don't understand why he wouldn't have succeed when al Groh succeeded. Parcells did NOT rebuild this team, the team was...
where did I move the goalposts? it seems as if you are doing so by posting wrong information and leaving out key points. his record through 3...
we had a ton of talent pre BP, BP coached that talent up and we became winners again. we went 9-7 w/ al groh in 2000, I think we would have been...
I am assuming based on what actually happened. who knows if we trade Key if BB is still here? many things could have changed but w/ the same...
they had more than enough defensive talent to win multiple SBs, the D carried them to their lone SB but the team was built around the O and the O...
he's a stat sheet filler, he does that wherever he goes. remember we had some really good skill guys when Peyton would have been young w/ Key,...
he kept the jets in the game or the D kept the Jets in the game despite him throwing 6 pics w/ 2 for TDs? yep, Namath throws 6 INts, 2 for Tds and...
you are too wrapped up in yards, points are what matters. we weren't even top 2 in pts scored the year he threw for 4000 yds(and almost 30 INTs)....
for all my criticism of Peyton the man wins in the reg season and gives a team a chance to get deep into postseason. had we drafted him we would...
we know he cost us BB and BB would have had the same staff in place here that he had in NE and wouldn't have had the extra 1st rd pick which was...
still lower than Joe's and in 333 LESS pass attempts Griese threw 19 MORE TDs and was +20 in TD to INT ratio(Joe was -47)
Roger Staubach's career high in pass attempts was 461. He threw 27 TDs and 11 INTs his next highest attempts was 413, he threw 25 TDs and 16...
yep. I love BP for turning around the franchise but he really cost us Manning or Belichick/Brady
Sanchez threw 5 and the Jets 6 in an OT 3 pt loss to Buffalo in 2009 so I wouldn't say unheard of.
he threw 111 less times in 1968 than 1967, his INT rate was down which was good but the biggest reason he wasn't in the 20s for INTs again was b/c...
clearly it was a very different era and the AFL at the time was a wide open game and he was a great downfield passer. INTs were up but to throw...
they can get some blame too but it doesn't change anything. To Joe's credit that moment changed his life, he saw it, was humiliated by it and...
all of what we post here are our individual opinions. to me he represented the team at a franchise function on Nat'l TV, he not only embarrassed...
yep, that's what I said.:rolleyes:
