Separate names with a comma.
Because Fields also stinks and you'd have to give up more for someone that either walks next year or you have to drastically overpay by picking up...
Trading up for a tackle would be alarming considering the guys making the decision won’t have a job when that tackle is ready to start.
Trade up for one of the top 3 WRs Select Bowers Trade down if you're not going to do either of the above, take a tackle and hope for the best
The value chart rules all. If we gave up our third without getting a third back we'd be getting rocked value-wise... 10+72 for pick 8 would mean...
We wouldn't have to give up our 3rd to move up two spots. Value wise, our first rounder (10) and first fourth rounder (111) are 1372 points, the...
He won't be there at 10. If we want him we're gonna have to jump the Bears IMO and I'm more than ok with that. He's got some Davante Adams in him....
Cool, trade up to 8 if he’s there
Bingo. I don’t think that’s even close to universal based off opinion from like 4 mediums, this site included.
A tradition unlike any other. For the first time in as long as I can remember, I’m not going to be able to watch the draft let alone be here or...
There’s close to nothing worth responding to in this drivel but I would love for you to find me where I said Brock Bowers is the only pick that...
Twas a joke my man. Relax. We all need the draft to get there.
Jets GM Joe Kronoking over here needs to be convinced of what we should do at 10 guys
Two things: 1. You just made your initial post even dumber. Or you outed yourself as being extremely biased towards OT. You called the tackle we...
So the tackle we take at 10 is a stud without room for discussion but Bowers might not work out?
Do you actually think this or are you just saying because the Jets are historically dumb they will do a historically dumb thing?
