I love Chad - BUT..........

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Green Guy, Sep 10, 2007.

  1. MSUJet85

    MSUJet85 ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Messages:
    12,771
    Likes Received:
    196
    Truer words were never spoken
     
  2. rillo

    rillo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,531
    Likes Received:
    0
    Totally agree....had nothing to do wit Chad....games are won in the trenches PERIOD!
     
  3. since83

    since83 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2003
    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wrong. If we had peyton teams would give our receivers more cushion to prevent the long ball. has anyone forgotten how fast our receivers are? LB would be forced to play 10 yrd curl to flats and not be 2-3 yrds of line of scrimmage. taking 2 yr drops to play the infamous 5 yrd quick slants. Thus taking so much pressure of the o-line and opening up the running lanes. When you hear most coaches talk about establishing the run game is because they have qb's that are viable threats. And, it's pathetic that some fans believe because NE's picked to go to the SB again we should accept losing. This is the NFL.
     
  4. Sundayjack

    Sundayjack pǝʇɔıppɐ ʎןןɐʇoʇ
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2003
    Messages:
    10,651
    Likes Received:
    1,061
    Here's my line of thinking:

    I hate that our offense is limited - and will always be - by an inability to stretch the field. That we may occasionally hit something long doesn't change the fact that teams will give that up every day of the week, in exchange for a focus underneath.

    Having said that, Chad this morning sits second in passer rating, a statistic which has never impressed me, but which does show efficiency. Can Kellen Clemens step in and be as efficient? He can certainly open up the field a little more, but I think the trade-off is that he will bring with him more mistakes and turnovers. I'm not so sure I've convinced myself very well, but for now, I think I'd like to rely on Chad's win-loss record as an indicator of his ability to lead this team. I'm all about keeping it simple right now - Chad wins more than he loses; and the Jets win more than they lose with him at the position.

    As a last point, I wouldn't rush to start the Kellen Clemens era if for no other reason than because Chad's injury history tells us that we're likely to be saved the trouble of a difficult decision. Maybe even this week. I think I'd let Chad's health determine who plays quarterback, and open the competition next year.
     
  5. PMCRW

    PMCRW New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    792
    Likes Received:
    0
    you deserve Kellen Clemens and a 1-15 season...
     
  6. typeOnegative13NY

    typeOnegative13NY Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2003
    Messages:
    14,959
    Likes Received:
    4,910
    I don;t even want to hear the "Chad can't throw the deep ball shit ". Nobody could with that Oline play.
     
  7. Lawbot

    Lawbot New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2004
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    0
    A deep passing game requires that the o-line give the qb and the receivers enough time to get deep. Did you see our o-line do that at all yesterday? Any time you see a QB with time to throw your beloved 50-yard strike, look at the o-line. They will be giving that QB a pocket to throw out of and time to find the open receiver down the field.

    We don't have that kind of O-line this year. Doesn't matter who is under center for the Jets this year, we will not have a deep passing game unless the o-line starts giving him time to throw.
     
  8. Wahoo

    Wahoo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2002
    Messages:
    4,917
    Likes Received:
    2,939

    Let me ask this then - If Clemens is that bad, WHY IS HE ON THE TEAM? WHY ARE WE PAYING HIM, AND WHY DON'T WE HAVE A YOUNG QB WHO CAN DO THE JOB? We know what Chad can do and what his limitations are, and that physically he doesn't have long left in the league (especially with this O line). If this team is "rebuilding" (yet again) and if Mangini and Tannenbaum have some "plan" (as everyone claims but I don't see), shouldn't the QB that is the supposed future be playing and growing with the team? And if Clemens isn't that guy, why is he here? This has nothing to do with liking Chad or his heart or anything, it has to do with what the "braintrust" (and right now it looks like anything but) is doing. And it doesn't look good.
     
    #28 Wahoo, Sep 10, 2007
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2007
  9. #28Martin

    #28Martin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,528
    Likes Received:
    452
    Alot of truth in that. You get the feeling when they play NE that Belichick knows that over the long haul of the game, that Chad can't beat him.
     
  10. Green Guy

    Green Guy New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    I want to thank the old timers who read all of my thread starter and commented fairly. Maybe the timing is bad, but it is what it is and so are the Jets...a team limited in offense by their quarterback's physical limitations - and that negatively impacts everything else the Jets can and cannot do.

    I agree 100% Tony - and Serby said it in his article today - Jet fans who cheered when Pennington went down do not have a leg to stand on...given everything that Chad has given to this franchise. However, that doesn't change what is...

    As #28Martin said in the previous post - you can sense that over the long haul a well coached team knows that Pennington cannot beat their team with his arm. Therefore, they defense the Jets differently than other teams - including putting more pressure on the Jets upfront. That has a direct effect on the performance of the offensive line - especially when you are playing against a good defensive line (and the Patriots have a great defensive line!). What that means is, against good teams, they will stack the Jets and prevent the run, and challenge the Jets to pass deep - and eventually sack Pennington if not intercept him. It's a direct result, not inconsequential...sorry...but that's reality.

    What does that do to our defense? It puts more pressure on them to hold the opponent longer, because the Jets cannot keep making first downs on dinks and dunks and control the clock. Is the Jet defense really that bad? No, I don't think so. They played a great offensive team with a HOF QB and WR and other excellent weapons at WR, TE and RB. The Patriots and Brady put pressure on the Jet defense - and without an offense to bail them out, the Jet D was shredded.

    It goes back to the whole team concepts...if you can't run and pass and pass deep, it negatively impacts your offense and defense and lines and everything else.

    Again, if you read my thread starter, I LOVE Chad Pennington, never said he sucks, respect what he's done with what he had - and hope he coaches our QB's if he doesn't become Offensive Coordinator some day. That said, if we don't turn it over to Clemens to see what we have, the Jets are stunting the growth of the team - and they will not get to the next level - Super Bowl contenders - in 2008. The Jets need to see if Clemens can lead them to the Superbowl - even as we fix other issues on the OLine and the Defense...if we ever want to win the big game.

    gg
     
  11. ANJI

    ANJI New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Messages:
    706
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with alot of what this man said.

    How bad was it that the rush didn't get to Brady and when the blitz was looking like it might get there, he could just sling the ball to a receiver out side. The Line isn't great but Chads arm does not help them at all either........ it's a two way street you know.
     
  12. Green Guy

    Green Guy New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks ANJI -

    Hey Jet fans - how often did Dan Marino get sacked? Was it a great Oline or his quick release and incredible arm? Could you blitz him? Did you need to drop back more guys in coverage?

    Brady, Peyton Manning, etc. - could they win a Super Bowl with the current Jets' team? I don't know, but they could get the Jets close if not the prize - because of their ability to throw the football - they make their teams' better.

    (I can hear you all now) I'm NOT saying Clemens is the next Marino or Brady or Manning - I'm not sure what he is or can be at this stage. But I do know one thing - if we don't find out then we'll go into 2008 with a shaky QB situation and no solution.

    Does that make any sense?
     
  13. Wahoo

    Wahoo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2002
    Messages:
    4,917
    Likes Received:
    2,939
    It makes a ton of sense, and it raises the question as to what Mangini and Tannenbaum see and what exactly they are doing. I was willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, but the Kendall thing really raised my eyebrows, and the team's performance yesterday starts the doubts flowing, and rightly so.
     
  14. Green Guy

    Green Guy New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    hey everyone, I understand the doubt - I have my own. However, I do think Mangini earned our support by his work last year - and until I see more that doesn't make sense, I'm behind him.

    However, at some point he will need to pull the trigger on Chad and Kellen. This will be a long lasting decision and one of the tougher ones he'll make as Jet HC. I'll be watching closely, and waiting and wondering and questioning until I see the results.
     
  15. #28Martin

    #28Martin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,528
    Likes Received:
    452
    Bottom line: Chad puts no fear in the oppossing team.
     
  16. championjets69

    championjets69 2008/2009 TGG Darksider Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Messages:
    17,353
    Likes Received:
    866
    Wow U R stealing my thunder!
     
  17. Attackett

    Attackett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Messages:
    12,121
    Likes Received:
    5,512
    This question is very simple to answer. NO, there is not a QB in the game today or in history that could win a SB with this D.
     
  18. Cman69

    Cman69 The Dark Admin, 2018 BEST Darksider Poster

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    38,039
    Likes Received:
    32,054
    Putting Clemens behind this OLine is the equivalent of turning him into David Carr. I wouldn't turn the reigns over just yet GG. Not because I have faith in Shad, who is fishbait behind this OLine. It's wiser to preserve Clemens until a better OLine somehow gets built thru the draft. Maybe by some miracle, Tannenbaum spends the money and brings in a QUALITY FA OLinesman instead of what we have now. Who knows...

    We all got a glimpse of what awaits any QB behind this OLine this season. They suck period. You're right that it doesn't help that defenses take away the short to medium range stuff, but this OLine is lacking in fundamentals so badly that no QB is safe. Stronger arm or not, without a decent OLine, any QB brave enough to take snaps on this team is nothing but the perverbial sacrificial lamb.

    Save Clemens until we can protect him.
     
  19. Italian Seafood

    Italian Seafood New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    12,545
    Likes Received:
    3
    That about says it. Thanks.
     
  20. Green Guy

    Green Guy New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Cman, that may be why Mangini is waiting too - he wants the oline to come together better. I can see Bender getting in at LG - but against New England and Baltimore, maybe he's waiting for the reason(s) you mentioned...not only for Clemens but for Bender.
     

Share This Page