Sanchez just sucks... just sucks. (all Sanchez complaints here)

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Sweet P, Oct 9, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 1968jetsfan

    1968jetsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Messages:
    5,503
    Likes Received:
    687
    Valid comparison, save for one point. Manning throws a lot more deep balls than Sanchez. And one contextual point, Manning is the exception to the rule that after 4 years as a starter in the league they suddenly get better.

    For every manning there are 30 who never pan out or improve.
     
  2. The 1985er

    The 1985er Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    9,070
    Likes Received:
    1,054
    It's only a matter of time before Hobbes throws MM under the bus.
     
  3. Joewillie78

    Joewillie78 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2013
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    1968 Jetfan, as I said "you must get CREATIVE to defend SANCHEZ" It got to the point last year where he would go like 7-19 68 yards 2 sacks. 2picks and TQBR of 6.6 and the SANCHEZ apologists would point out that he had NO FUMBLES.

    Whats really amazing to me is that their are still JET FANS out there that believe he is a viable NFL QB! Simply amazing!
     
  4. footballfundamentals

    footballfundamentals Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    831
    Likes Received:
    366
    2004-2006 Kevin Gilbride QB coach
    2007-present Kevin Gilbride Offensive coordinator

    I know the Giants draft better but the offensive coordination has been nonexistent...for Sanchez
     
    #14824 footballfundamentals, Aug 18, 2013
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2013
  5. Joewillie78

    Joewillie78 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2013
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    VALID point BUT is it that SANCHEZ is such an awful QB and REX is clueless about offense that gets OC's fired or is it the other way around and the OC's combined with REX make poor QB's?

    I tend to think that SANCHEZ could get BILL WALSH and AIR CORYELL fired!
     
  6. deerow84

    deerow84 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    3,814
    Likes Received:
    421
    Just too many mistakes. Mistakes cost you points and, ultimately, games. Hobbes can keep telling himself the pick was 100% on Winslow but that just is not the case. It just isn't.

    If someone made a computer render of that exact play removing all the colours and names from the players so people wouldn't let their personal bias alter their perception and polled people I think even Hobbes, not seeing that #6 on the jersey, would say the QB shares at least a percentage of blame if not 100% of the blame.

    If that was his sole mistake you could maybe give it a bit of a pass but there were so many other little mistakes and then at least two massive ones that cost us points.

    I hope Smith rocks it against the Giants and wins the starting job. That's not because I hate Sanchez so much and think Smith is our saviour, it's because if he's not capable of beating out Sanchez to start we are in big, big trouble.
     
  7. Joewillie78

    Joewillie78 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2013
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    W, actually most forums make you scream that, but those little tid-bits of information that make you go:" HUH, I never thought of that", make it worthwhile wading through the 95% of crap. Anyway, since the ESPN JETS forum was shut down, I have been looking for a viable JETS forum and this one, I really enjoy so far! Thanks!
     
  8. 1968jetsfan

    1968jetsfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Messages:
    5,503
    Likes Received:
    687
    Thanks for this link, I hadn't thought to look at this.

    You know Hobbes loves to put a lot of emphasis on Sanchez's 98 QB rating in the first game....so I thought I'd see how his rating appears on this list.

    He doesn't even show up on the list of the top 49 players on the list...which means his rating is lower than 86.1, in fact it's 84.7. Which also makes him the Lowest rated QB on the team. Now QBR is a horrible stat that I never refer to as a rule, its among the least accurate indicators of a QB's real performance, but since Hobbes has been harping on it I figure it's worth pointing out that Sanchez's QBR for the pre season has him ranked #52, right behind that perennial all star Matt Cassel and right ahead of the QB stud Austin Davis.
     
  9. mute

    mute Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Messages:
    9,113
    Likes Received:
    3,142
    that explains all the shitty posting lately. ESPN forums before it closed was filled with racist idiots. Then recently ESPN forced many to use FACEBOOK to comment, the place kinda died because those idiots couldn't hide anymore.
    So now they run to the ends of the internet to look for a new home.

    I'm not saying you are one of them, just stating what has always been known as a shitty community. Welcome, I guess.
     
  10. Joewillie78

    Joewillie78 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2013
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think in a "fair" competition and under different circumstances, he could beat out SANCHEZ but with REX trying to save his job this year, I dont think he believes that a rookie can go in there and be the difference. And again, I am not a SMITH FAN, but after seeing RGIII, LUCK, and WILSON (all rookies, lead there teams to great seasons, I would put SMITH in there in a heartbeat!
     
  11. Hobbes3259

    Hobbes3259 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    15,454
    Likes Received:
    393
    You know, consodering its a discussion thread, maybe you could tell me what I am wrong about.


    The throw was. Early a call for winslow, amd the other two recievers did the same theng, went forward, reading feet, for the cue to break under neath. Winslow took a blocking position on the dbs outsode ahoukder, like it

    was a run play.
     
  12. Section 227. Row 5

    Section 227. Row 5 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    12,562
    Likes Received:
    6
    Run for your life while you still have your sanity.
     
  13. RIPJimLeonhard

    RIPJimLeonhard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2012
    Messages:
    1,232
    Likes Received:
    686
    This is going to be a long season.
     
  14. Joewillie78

    Joewillie78 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2013
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    MUTE, you are 100% correct. We had a big TEBOW fan who posted the most incredible RACIST posts, and seemed to bring out the worst in the forum. We had a very good circle of about 10 posters that would talk JETS football, and although many times, we were at diametrically different opinions, we were very civil to each other! I know I get passionate about the JETS and my views, but I will simply keep hammering away at what I believe are FACTS that back up my opinions. I hope I dont let you down!
     
  15. Jake

    Jake Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    15,749
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    Cant wait.
     
  16. mute

    mute Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Messages:
    9,113
    Likes Received:
    3,142
    I would like to introduce you to Hobbes. :)
     
    #14836 mute, Aug 18, 2013
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2013
  17. Hobbes3259

    Hobbes3259 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    15,454
    Likes Received:
    393


    Ok.

    Theres the box score.
    http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/boxscore?gid=20130809008

    My guess is your extensive football knowledge is leading you to confuse that made for TV ESPN stat, with the universally accepted Passer rating,

    But hey....
    When you get your information, from ESPN, you must be a knowledgeable critic.
     
  18. Joewillie78

    Joewillie78 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2013
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    So far, I have read Mr. Hobbes posts, and although I DISAGREE with him 100% on SANCHEZ, he is very passionate about his support for SANCHEZ, and although I will argue with him about SANCHEZ's ability as an NFL QB, I respect someone who is so committed to a psoition as Mr. Hobbes is.
     
  19. BleedingGangGreen

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    104
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not defending Sanchez or anything, only making an observation with numbers.

    During our first two preseason games last season under Sparano, Sanchez combined for 13/17 (76.4%) 80 yards, 0 TD's/1 INT, 5 sacks with a QB Rating of 61.65.

    During our first two preseason games this season under Marty M., Sanchez combined for 23/36 (63.9%), 294 yards, 2 TD's/2 INT's, 1 sack with a QB Rating of 84.7.

    I'm sorry (and this is coming from a Geno Smith supporter), but Sanchez' preseason hasn't been anything close to being as bad as some of these Sanchez critics are painting it out to be. For a matter of fact Sanchez ranks second amongst all NFL QB's in preseason yards and tied for 4th in TD's thrown. He's only been sacked 1 time (every QB has been sacked at least once, some as many as 5, 6 and 7).

    Week three is going to be a big week for Sanchez (importance wise) against a really good Giants defense (on the road). But to sit here and act as if Sanchez has failed thus far through the preseason due to two INT's is pretty off-basis. His completion percentage is at 63.9% under a new offensive coordinator when compared to his career average of 55.1%. He's not taking sacks and even seen him spike a ball last night on a broken play (crowd applauded).

    Is he performing like an All-Pro? No. Making preseason mistakes like mostly every other NFL Quarterback? Yes.
     
    #14839 BleedingGangGreen, Aug 18, 2013
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2013
  20. RIPJimLeonhard

    RIPJimLeonhard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2012
    Messages:
    1,232
    Likes Received:
    686
    Sometimes he gets a little ridiculous though, as long as he keeps it in the Sanchez thread though, I have no problem with it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page