Cimini: NYJ still trying to trade Bart Scott

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by VanderbiltJets, Mar 18, 2012.

  1. Jersey Joe 67

    Jersey Joe 67 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    Messages:
    7,202
    Likes Received:
    1,873
    I do also simply because of his contract.
     
  2. Big Blocker

    Big Blocker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    13,104
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    Despite the dropoff from the 2010 level of performance, and even playing fewer passing downs, Scott still rated above average. They have to pay him, anyway, and there are too many other holes to fill. The cap is the cap. Logic dictates that he comes back.

    The only way it makes sense that he doesn't is if Scott somehow was too much of a distraction, too much of a locker room malcontent, and more so than we presently have any facts to show. And if that were the case, what does it say about Ryan, his supposed connection to players like Scott who supposedly want to play for him? And about Tanny and the contract the Jets have with Scott?

    No, I think he comes back, because the alternatives would be quite disconcerting.
     
  3. Jersey Joe 67

    Jersey Joe 67 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    Messages:
    7,202
    Likes Received:
    1,873
    My only concern is his attitude coming into this season knowing the Jets were shopping him?
     
  4. Don

    Don 2008 TGG Rich Kotite "Least Knowledgeable" Award W

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    23,098
    Likes Received:
    1,588
    I don't think anybody associated with the team liked how he left the locker room at the end of last season..they may very well be worried he will be a distraction.
     
  5. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    Scott's on the bubble to drop out of the NFL at this point. He's reached the age where he won't get the benefit of the doubt except from coaches he has played for during his prime. Basically that's Rex and Pettine at this point.

    He either has a good season or he figures out what's next. I'm not worried about his motivation to play well at this point.
     
  6. VanderbiltJets

    VanderbiltJets Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2010
    Messages:
    3,091
    Likes Received:
    23
    The Jets Stream
    Tannenbaum on Bart Scott: "He's going to be here for the offseason program and he's under contract." #nyj
    about 35 mins ago
     
  7. Montana

    Montana Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    2
    ...at his request.
     
  8. Big Blocker

    Big Blocker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    13,104
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    Meaning no other team so far wanted him with his contract at a price worth trading. Scott will accept this and, unless he retires, will be happy to go back to the Jets.

    30 days, next case.
     
  9. reverseapachemaster

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Messages:
    612
    Likes Received:
    0
    LOL I saw on ESPN some idiot was talking about "sources" saying the Jets are going to trade Scott plus some draft pick for Tebow and Sanchez to Chiefs.
     
  10. Don

    Don 2008 TGG Rich Kotite "Least Knowledgeable" Award W

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    23,098
    Likes Received:
    1,588
    Which idiot was that and when?
     
  11. NotSatoshiNakamoto

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    16,349
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    I don't even understand what you're saying.
     
  12. Don

    Don 2008 TGG Rich Kotite "Least Knowledgeable" Award W

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    23,098
    Likes Received:
    1,588
    Another punctuation wizard. I think he was saying that we would trade Scott and a pick to get Tebow which is ridiculous, the second part was that we are trading Sanchez to the Chiefs., also ridiculous after the deal we just gave him.

    I would like to know who said that and when they said it though.
     
  13. TNJet

    TNJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    6,312
    Likes Received:
    1,636
    I like the first part of that.
     
  14. reverseapachemaster

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Messages:
    612
    Likes Received:
    0
    It was about two hours ago. I forgot who it was. Some idiot in the comments section of one of Cimini's nonsense articles.

    A punctuation wizard with broken punctuation powers. The "and" was conjunctive of two independent clauses. No comma was necessary preceding the and, although I can see how it would have clarified meaning.
     
  15. Will-I-Am-Not

    Will-I-Am-Not Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    Messages:
    1,643
    Likes Received:
    850
    I have no idea who said it; but if I had to guess, the irrationality of the information has Stephen A. Smith written all over it.



     
  16. xxedge72x

    xxedge72x 2018 Gang Green QB Guru Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    12,286
    Likes Received:
    3,954
    [​IMG]
     
  17. Footballgod214

    Footballgod214 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    15,220
    Likes Received:
    6,086
    Any time you see Wilson on the field, Scott is on the bench.

    That's his gripe, getting 'yoinked' for the nickle package.

    So, while it sucks that Scott can't cover the slot (or the TE in a 2 receiver set) anymore, it's good for the Jets that we have Wilson who with the extra playing time, is coming along just fine.

    If we DO replace Scott with an ILB that can cover the slot, you will have Wilson on the bench 95% of the time (he'll still be out there in dime). Maybe that's when Rex moves Wilson to #2 and Cro to FS. But not before Rex has an ILB that can cover the slot (and/or releasing TE).
     
  18. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    As long as the Jets have to change personnel routinely to get things done there are going to be problems. Scott doesn't need to be able to airtight cover the TE but he does need not to be a huge liability when he's stuck one-on-one with them.

    The Jets defense was situationally great last season and it absolutely blew chunks when the wrong personnel package was on the field and the opponent said FU and went no-huddle to exploit that.

    Aaron Maybin may have looked great at times last season but he was part of the problem. So was Bart Scott. So was Sione Pouha. So was Mike Devito.

    You can't have a defense where 3 or 4 positions are like a fish out of water when a smart QB is on the field against them. That's just the kiss of death.
     
  19. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,996
    Likes Received:
    25,067
    Maybe the fact that Bart Scott rates above average in some aspects is why the Jets are trying to get something for him to begin with. He may be a very solid blocker for Harris, but his position is the most easily replaceable in the LB corps that Rex keeps.

    What he brought to the team was knowledge and Rex's culture, but they rightly avoid giving him and lot of pass coverage responsibly and he hasn't been one of the guys calling signals.

    The team appears to feel that those intangibles he brought with him have run their course.
     
  20. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    I think it's more likely that he got a year older and his above average skills deteriorated to just average and the Jets really don't want to be stuck with the guaranteed contract that they gave him last season for this year despite the fact that he was over 30.

    Dumb moves cause ripples down the road.
     

Share This Page