Will Jerry Porter be back in Raiders Black?

Discussion in 'National Football League' started by rmagedon, Feb 19, 2009.

  1. rmagedon

    rmagedon Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,896
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://blogs.nfl.com/2009/02/18/will-porter-be-back-in-raiders-black/

    :rofl: Only in Oakland.
     
  2. brothermoose

    brothermoose Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7,382
    Likes Received:
    35
    The Jaguars go and pull a play right out of the Raiders Playbook, trying to High Dollar Raid Joey Porter with the most dead presidents...and lo' and behold matey, he walks a big fat plank all season (raiderstyle)...now he may return to his former team with the dough, and play ball for a few years on the cheap. Proving that even the Raiders, get Raidered *ahem* Raided.
     
  3. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    Porter would be the end of cable... good.
     
  4. rmagedon

    rmagedon Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,896
    Likes Received:
    0
    If they do get him back, I'd love to see the posts where Jeaux praises Porter prior to Shell, next to the posts where he trashes Porter when he left to the Jags, next to the spin posts about how Porter will be the missing ingredient to at least 2 of the Raiders Super Bowl Championship runs that he predicts will take place within the next 5 years.
     
  5. Raiderjoe

    Raiderjoe Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,823
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually Its a very smart signing if it happens. First J Porter after signing that big contract had surgury and missed all the camps and preseason. The guy just wasn't healthy last year.

    Lets look why Porter makes sense. 1. First Raiders will rely heavily on their running game. J Porter at 6'2 220 is a very good run blocker. 2. J Porter is a very nice target for Russell(gives Russell another option to go with their stud Te Zach Miller. 3 J Porter is playing for a contract. 4. Gives raiders at least one veteran WR as they have alot of young inexperience Wrs.
     
  6. Twombles

    Twombles Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2005
    Messages:
    4,652
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey RJ, I'd just like your opinion. Is Porter better than Cotchery?
     
  7. Namath2Kolber

    Namath2Kolber New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,970
    Likes Received:
    1
    Jerry Porter was never good and isn't going to start now.
     
  8. Raiderjoe

    Raiderjoe Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,823
    Likes Received:
    0
    Cotchery has the better numbers than Porter and has done more the last couple of years. Not to mention has been alot more durable than Porter. So yes you have to say Cotchery has been better reciever. Only thing going against cotchery in that matchup is he offers nothing as a big play reciever. More of a possessin reciever.(nothing wrong with that if you have a explosive WR opposite him)
     
  9. Raiderjoe

    Raiderjoe Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,823
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thats not true. HE was a big reason why Callahan took Gruden same offense and made it the best offense in football. Raiders went from two Te formations, to three wr sets. LIke Randy Moss showed in Oakland, a Wr is always depended on a QB and a Oline . Without those two it really dosen't matter how good a Wr is.

    Signing J Porter If it happens is a very good move. Shouldn't be that expensive and has a chance to pay big dividends.
     

Share This Page