Unless there's another good tackle out there, we should stay at 4 and 29 instead of trading up for Leinart. Let's say we take Matt Leinart and Chad comes back and is good, we are stuck with 2 QBs and have given up the opportunity to draft a second starter at 29. This team has alot of needs and unless Leinart is a Reggie Bush type of prospect, I really think we would be better served taking players at 4 and 29 or even moving down and gaining a player and a slightly lower pick. If we could stay in the top 10 and get Cutler while obtaining a tackle in the trade down, that would be ideal. Remember that most rankings have D'Brickashaw Ferguson rated higher than Leinart. I have always been a proponent of drafting him at 4, and I don't think it will happen but I wish it would.
I've seen many boards that have Ferguson ranked higher than Leinart. I disagree, but there are plenty out there.
I think it's a lot more likely to get a solid o-lineman late in the draft than a QB late. It's not as if we don't take brick, we can't get any help on the line.
We shall see...I would like for the Jets to grab someone other than QB...at 4 and 29...Like maybe a nice RB with the 29th pick.
you need a solid offensive line to protect our noodle armed qb dbrick we should take we passed on pace when parcells was here might get the next comming
Yeah that's true, offensive linemen are supposed to be somewhat deep in this draft but Brick is head and shoulders above all of them.
I agree Brick is the best available in the draft, but Winston Justice isn't that far behind him as far as talent goes.
what about lendale white.did you see him i the texas usc game.the guy reminds me of a young jerome bettis
I am just not in favor of turning 2 number ones into 1 number one. Particularly if 1 of my ones is going to get me a star.
