"Trading Down" talk

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Mexican Buc, Mar 15, 2006.

  1. Mexican Buc

    Mexican Buc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,471
    Likes Received:
    39
    What's with all this trading down talk?

    1- HOU: They were though to maybe take Vince. Extended Carr, that's out. Seemed locked on Bush. But now it's clear they are now, and want to trade out.

    2- NO: Matt and NO was a lock, and everyone knew it. Now with Brees in NO, this pick is flimsy too. Now with no need for a QB the Saints also want to trade down.

    3- TEN: The only team trying to stay the course. But now with the first to picks out of wack, they could go for Matt instead of Vince. Or they may even land Bush. One things for sure, they have shown no sign of wanting to trade down.

    4- NYJ: Probably the funnel of the chaos. Clearly the team with QB and RB problems. Not to mention OL (OT). Would be the most likely to trade up to 1 or 2 and try to get a Bush or Matt or Vince to help solve one of their problems- if they were farther down in the draft. The fact that they are sitting on #4 and the top 2 are so unstable means they could very well not move at all and bet one of the Elite 3 falls to them- which likely will. And then there is the talk of them wanting to trade down becusae they have too many holes.



    I mean it looks like almost EVERYONE wants to trade down! Who the heck is going to be doing the trading up?!
     
  2. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    Haven't you posted this exact thread already?
     
  3. sanchizeqb

    sanchizeqb Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    3,391
    Likes Received:
    0
    He didn't get the replies he was looking for, so......

    On topic, I don't think we know what any of the teams want. With just over a month less, we're almost just as clueless as we were in January.
     

Share This Page