This is it

Discussion in 'Draft' started by inSANITy, Apr 27, 2007.

  1. inSANITy

    inSANITy Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    2,808
    Likes Received:
    0
    After seeing hundreds of mock drafts it looks like it comes down to this.

    These are the 10 players that the jets can possibly get
    1.justin blaylock
    2.ben grubbs
    3.lawrence timmons
    4. robert meachem
    5. dwayne jarrett
    6. greg olsen
    7. darrelle revis
    8. aaron ross
    9. chris houston
    10. joe staley
    * anthony spencer
    *paul pozlusney
    10. now there are a couple of guys i dont think are gonna fit grubbs is kinda high at our pick so im gonna cross him out.
    9. Darrelle revis seems he is not gonna fall to us.
    8. Olsen will probably go to the panthers unless they take nelson, but imo thats too high for nelson so unless they trade down olsen is off the board.


    That leaves us with 7 players
    2 cbs
    2 wrs
    2 o-lineman
    1 olb

    CB
    Now i think the most common pick would be for us to pick a cb because miller hasnt turned out to be what we wanted for a cb, i think he deserves another year but obviously mangini knows more than us. And we will find out soon enough.

    WR
    Alot of people say we dont need a wr, well they are wrong, lol. Wrs are never productive in there 1st year it usually takes 3yrs for a wr to break through cotchery is proof of this. Coles is a great receiver now but in 3 years he will be 32 on his decline and into retirement. This is why i think that a wr would be so great. Face it the chances of smith becoming a starter are slim he is a randle el guy he belongs in the slot. Robert Meachem is a great talent he has a whole bunch of speed great hands and is 6'2. I like jarrett as well, yea he had a horrible 40 time but game speed is different then running on a straight line and we all know that he played amazing this season. IMO i think we should take a wr, i really like meachem and hopefully he will be there, i understand that dallas needs wrs but there secondary is loosey goosey. I say if meachem is there take him, i like jarrett but am afraid he could be a reggie williams.

    O-lineman
    Justin Blaylock seems like a great player but from what i heard he might be playing guard and i dont see the need to take a guard in the first round it just doesnt make sense to me. We could pick a guard up later in the draft and kendall has atleast another 2 years in him so i dont think that drafting a guard round 1 is a good choice. The other lineman Joe staley looks like he could be a great tackle he has good size and great feet, but is 25 a stretch? Its a toss up

    OLB
    Lawrence timmons Lawrence timmons, yes he is a great olb but i dk if there is a huge need for us to take an olb first round it would be kind of like a luxury pick. we have 2 "good" olbs already and there are alot great olb prospects that could play for us. Plus he lied bout his height and is only 6'1 not 6'3. Do all players do that cuz i know in high school we bump the stats a lil?

    So imo i think that we should take these players in this order of availability
    Meachem
    ross
    staley, blaylock (only if playing tackle)
    houston
    jarrett

    Feel free to criticize me or what not, i am not a college football fanatic but i do read up on players and watch the games
     
    #1 inSANITy, Apr 27, 2007
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2007
  2. Big Cotch

    Big Cotch Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    Messages:
    529
    Likes Received:
    0
    Harrell, and Pozlusney are probably very real options-- although I hope not in Harrells case.
     
  3. Imagesrdecieving

    Imagesrdecieving Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,512
    Likes Received:
    902
    Please add Spencer to this list. He is the one guy that I feel every GM will look back and think to themselves "Damn! We could have had this kid.". OLB is not as much of a luxury as you might think. All of the guys we signed this offseason scream depth - not long-term solution.
     

Share This Page