The Jets are trying to move up to number 2 overall?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Kramer, Apr 25, 2009.

Page 1 of 5
  1. Kramer

    Kramer Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2007
    Messages:
    557
    Likes Received:
    0
    From Rich Eisens twitter:
    Mayock just got a text that the Jets are trying to make a play and get up to No. 2 in the draft!!! Stay tuned on that one!

    Gotta be expensive
     
    #1 Kramer, Apr 25, 2009
  2. jaybny

    jaybny Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    0
    "The phones BLOWING UP with the Jets trying to move up to #2"
     
    #2 jaybny, Apr 25, 2009
  3. PinPointPenning10

    PinPointPenning10 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    156
    Why? If they love Sanchez this much, just go for pick 8. Getting up to 2 would cost way too much.
     
    #3 PinPointPenning10, Apr 25, 2009
  4. RobA

    RobA 2005-2007 TGG.com Most Optimistic Award Winner

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Messages:
    8,746
    Likes Received:
    299
    HELL NO!

    That's gonna cost a rediculous price, especially for an unproven QB! Save the picks!
     
    #4 RobA, Apr 25, 2009
  5. Bvon

    Bvon New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jets might offer #17 and a 1st rounder in 2010 next year to move up to #2.

    I don't know....I want Sanchez really bad, but, I don't know if he's worth that.

    How about #17, a 3rd rounder and a 2nd rounder in 2010?
     
    #5 Bvon, Apr 25, 2009
  6. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would put a cuetip in my ear and answer a phone if this actually happens.
     
    #6 624, Apr 25, 2009
  7. xmscott

    xmscott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2007
    Messages:
    3,846
    Likes Received:
    93
    Ugh. I am not a fan of trading picks for next year.
     
    #7 xmscott, Apr 25, 2009
  8. jetsyankeesfan6

    jetsyankeesfan6 New Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2008
    Messages:
    625
    Likes Received:
    0
    i would not want to give up that much for anyone, even if it turned out to be a Peyton Manning, it just would hurt too many other facets of the team. Besides, it's almost impossible to make such a trade.
     
    #8 jetsyankeesfan6, Apr 25, 2009
  9. WW85

    WW85 MOCKERATOR
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    13,482
    Likes Received:
    959
    Mayock said it involves the Jets 17th pick and next year's 1st Rd pick. STL would still want more, IMO.


    Trading next year's picks is a very BAD idea.....next year's draft is the best in a decade...Rd 1 will be loaded.
     
    #9 WW85, Apr 25, 2009
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2009
  10. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    What was the problem with trading up with the Rams at #2 last year?
     
    #10 Cakes, Apr 25, 2009
  11. maynardsmyhero-uk

    maynardsmyhero-uk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2007
    Messages:
    3,265
    Likes Received:
    61
    What the fuck are they doing! We wouldn't do this for bush so why now??

    Crazy

    PSL anyone
     
    #11 maynardsmyhero-uk, Apr 25, 2009
  12. JetRizing89

    JetRizing89 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,012
    Likes Received:
    60
    this is ridiculous, if we HAVE to take sanchez just do it at 8, if we do it at 2 we have to give him like 35 million guarenteed
     
    #12 JetRizing89, Apr 25, 2009
  13. rico college

    rico college Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,553
    Likes Received:
    120
    A 1st this year and our next's years 1st.

    Wow
     
    #13 rico college, Apr 25, 2009
  14. brothermoose

    brothermoose Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7,382
    Likes Received:
    35
    [​IMG]
     
    #14 brothermoose, Apr 25, 2009
  15. PinPointPenning10

    PinPointPenning10 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    156
    At this point, why the hell didn't we just get Cutler? I really hope this doesn't happen. With the depth in next year's draft, giving up a first rounder in 2010 would be a HUGE mistake. Especially since Sanchez probably wouldn't start next year and with Clemens it could very likely be a top-10 pick.
     
    #15 PinPointPenning10, Apr 25, 2009
  16. Don

    Don 2008 TGG Rich Kotite "Least Knowledgeable" Award W

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    23,098
    Likes Received:
    1,588
    This is nonsense..but if it were to happen it would just prove again what a fool Tannenbaum is..this would cost the Jets more than Cutler and he was a PROVEN franchise QB.
     
    #16 Don, Apr 25, 2009
  17. Bvon

    Bvon New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't know how I feel about this guys. I really want him, badly. But two 1sts seems a tad high.
     
    #17 Bvon, Apr 25, 2009
  18. rico college

    rico college Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,553
    Likes Received:
    120
    Tanny is going for big headlines.
     
    #18 rico college, Apr 25, 2009
  19. Mr Electric

    Mr Electric Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    18,362
    Likes Received:
    1
    I hope we don't give up our first in 2010...

    I'd be okay with this: 17th overall, this and next year's second rounder, and another late rounder (5th through 7th)
     
    #19 Mr Electric, Apr 25, 2009
  20. Killeri9590

    Killeri9590 Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,451
    Likes Received:
    0
    Won't happen imo
     
    #20 Killeri9590, Apr 25, 2009
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 1 of 5

Share This Page