Stephen Hill

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by 21stAmendment, Sep 16, 2012.

  1. joegee

    joegee Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2002
    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    20
    The interference was obvious. Bad non call on that play.
     
  2. JoeWalton

    JoeWalton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    4,797
    Likes Received:
    2,311
    ...is not a first round draft pick
     
  3. Royce Parker

    Royce Parker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,916
    Likes Received:
    61
    I don't know what Sanchez said but I noticed the same thing - after that miss they didn't look for Hill for the rest of the ENTIRE fucking game. Not exactly the way to instill confidence in your rookie WR after one drop.

    After the game he had last week they should have made some type of effort to at least get the ball in his hands and boost his confidence. Not sure if that's on Sparano or Sanchez but I was pissed off all game watching him be a complete non-factor while Holmes muffed passes all day.
     
  4. vajet69

    vajet69 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    0
    Holmes going back to Pittsburgh affected the game plan. Mark went out of his way to try and get him the ball. Last week they spread the ball around much better. I give Hill a pass on the drop. It's tough to catch that ball when your arm is grabbed. They had to make Captain example happy.
     
  5. WW85

    WW85 MOCKERATOR
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    13,482
    Likes Received:
    959
    You're right, it would have been an outstanding catch, but the defender broke up the play, interference or not..

    I can't fault Hill today, you can't make plays if he's only throw the ball once his way.

    I've never viewed Holmes as a #1 receiver. Holmes needs the ball in space to make plays, not thrown into tight coverage .
     
  6. Penning-10

    Penning-10 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2003
    Messages:
    1,432
    Likes Received:
    0
    I need an explanation as to why he was targeted ONCE.
     
  7. Jeti

    Jeti Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2012
    Messages:
    5,356
    Likes Received:
    1,111
    what he say
     
  8. Royce Parker

    Royce Parker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,916
    Likes Received:
    61
    I believe Kerley was targeted once as well. Did Schilens even play? I'd like to know what percentage of passes were thrown to Holmes today - seemed like about 95% - what the fuck was going on?
     
  9. Barcs

    Barcs Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,776
    Likes Received:
    267
    Our receivers were blanketed the entire game. Surprisingly good play from most of their CBs.
     
  10. JustaJetFan

    JustaJetFan Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2012
    Messages:
    154
    Likes Received:
    0
    What happened was we played a very good secondary with a very good coach. Now this is just me assuming but, since the Steelers like to blitz a lot I'm guessing they were blitzing while having Hill and Holmes in single coverage. I think Sanchez just went to the TE's or Holmes in this situation since they were the easier targets to hit. I'm not worried about Hill's performance, he'll have plenty of chances to prove himself against the Texans and 49ers.
     
  11. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    This is what it seemed like and neither Hill nor Holmes won their 1 vs 1 matchups. They couldn't beat the corners in time. Neither were on the same page as Sanchez where Sanchez could just throw up a jump ball or something like that
     
  12. Murrell2878

    Murrell2878 Lets go JETS!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    24,459
    Likes Received:
    858
    He said they wanted to get Holmes the ball and it looked like they forced it.
     
  13. NotSatoshiNakamoto

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    16,349
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    Cool - so the team wanted to get the ball to Holmes so he could "get revenge" on the Steelers or something? Glad they could cater to his selfish wants and he responded in such great fashion. No way should this type of thing ever be a part of the teams plan. SMH. The goal is to win the fucking game, not make someone happy.

    I really dislike Holmes. When he's making plays it's easy to overlook. When he's dropping nearly everything coming his way it's really annoying.
     
  14. JET'S_my_name

    JET'S_my_name Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    Rooks being rooks.
     
  15. Murrell2878

    Murrell2878 Lets go JETS!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    24,459
    Likes Received:
    858
    I wanted us to pay Braylon instead because Braylon makes plays in tough spots where as Holmes makes plays when their easy (minus his great SB GW TD reception). Holmes is a game breaker and can be lethal when he has the ball in space, but in 2010 Braylon opened up a lot of those opportunities. Plus, Braylon is a much better teammate - from what I can tell.
     
  16. Hobbes3259

    Hobbes3259 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    15,454
    Likes Received:
    393
    What happens when in the interest of self preservation, Sanchez avoids droptonio....
     

Share This Page