Steelers extend... Brown ?

Discussion in 'National Football League' started by dcm1602, Jul 27, 2012.

  1. dcm1602

    dcm1602 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is the most bizarre move ive seen in a long time

    -Rotoworld

    They had Brown for 500k this year, could of RFA tagged him next year (3m) then extended or franchise tagged him.

    And its going to infurate Wallace, I cant imagine why theyd ever do this

    Brown isnt even worth the contract he got either, hes had 1 good season and hasnt done much else...

    What the hell were they thinking
     
  2. tanknyc

    tanknyc Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,969
    Likes Received:
    18
    Would be nice if we could steal Mike Wallace
     
  3. dcm1602

    dcm1602 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nobodys gonna be stealing him since its gonna take either a 1st/2nd to trade for him this year, or a 50-60 million + dollar contract to bring him in when hes inevitably a free agent.

    I really hope he ends up going to Baltimore, that would be pretty awesome and a huge fuck you to Steeler nation.

    Though idk how interested the Ravens will be with Tory Smith as a burner, but I guess Wallace could always replace Boldin who seems to be at the end of his ropes anyway.

    I just wonder if the Steelers plan on holding Wallace this year, then tagging him next.
     
  4. Axel3419

    Axel3419 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,203
    Likes Received:
    970
    Wallace will end up a Bengal. You heard it here first.
     
  5. xc944

    xc944 Banned

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    reason they did this is wallace disapeared completely the second half last year and there are many rumbling he began to have a big attitude. one thing the steelers have shown is they dont dea with diva wr's. as far as brown he was great in the playoffs his rookie year with huge plays and he was better last season then wallace, hes a far more complete wr. wallace at this point is a deep threat only he ishorrible at catching in traffic and never fights for the ball. good move on the steelers part. another thing its been reported for months that wallace believes hes fitz or mega and is demanding that kind of money, he didnt even get one offer this off season something has to be up
     
  6. xc944

    xc944 Banned

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    he wants fitz and johnson money 60 mill wont come close. hes out of his mind and from some reports i read last night its him not his agent with these crazy demands
     
  7. xc944

    xc944 Banned

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    1 good year and hasnt done much else, do you know football. hes been in the league 2 years and go watch who catches the game ending catch against the jets in the afccg. go look who made the biggest catch the week before against the ravens then last year he became the first player ever in the history of the nfl to have 1000recieving yds and 1000 return yds. i would say hes done a few things. the steelers also got him with the pick the jets gave them for santonio holmes. they traded the 5th to arizona for bryan mcfadden and arizonas 6th and with that 6th pick they took brown who was a pro bowler last year
     
  8. joolander

    joolander New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2011
    Messages:
    194
    Likes Received:
    0
    if i were cleveland, id throw mike wallace a contract if/when hes a free agent
     
  9. CJLang

    CJLang Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    5,497
    Likes Received:
    549
    Wallace is a one trick pony. He's a deep threat with blazing speed (It's a nice trick).

    He doesn't like balls in traffic and there are doubts he can stand up to any real physical play.

    i think the steelers took the money they were offering Wallace and said fine, if you don't want it, maybe our other WR, who's alot more versatile will take. He did.

    Wallace is gonna screw himself out of some decent money thinking he's way better than he's shown.

    The Steelers, like the Pats, and the other teams that are successful over a long period never let the players dictate their terms.
     
  10. dcm1602

    dcm1602 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not giving Wallace a deal I understand.

    But giving Brown a monster deal, when you effectively have him under contract for pennies the next 2 years, or 3 (@ 4-5m per) if they tag him.

    Is just idiotic
     
  11. xc944

    xc944 Banned

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    First of all he was under contract until the end of his season. His new deal is a extension so they now have him for 6 seasons. Steelers know what they're doing they have proved that many times.
     
  12. xc944

    xc944 Banned

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not only that it's a very team friendly deal they can cut him with small hit. I guess it's idiotic to give a pro bowl wr 42 mill extension. But smart to I've a guy with zero pro bowls 50 mill, that's idiotic
     
  13. xc944

    xc944 Banned

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's also bein reported all over steelers offered Wallace 5 yrs 50 million and he wanted no less then 55. Even 50 is to much for a wr unless fitz or johnson
     
  14. dcm1602

    dcm1602 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hes an RFA at the end of the season.

    So you get him this year @ 500k, next year @ 3m (max rfa tender) then can tag him if you want

    That comes to 15m~ over 3 years or 5m/yr

    Instead they gave him 7m a year over 6 years, to a guy who only has 1 good year under his belt.

    There is NO way this is a smart move, and was done primarily to prove a point to Wallace.

    The smart move would of been to have him play out the next 2 years for < 4m, then use the franchise tag as leverage to lock him up long term.

    Effectively all they did was waste cap space, on a team that doesnt have much
     
  15. xc944

    xc944 Banned

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    how many good years has santonio had he got 50 mill? steelers have brown under contract for 6 yrs. they could have lost him next year another team could have given a better deal or he could pull what wallace is pulling. they like him love his attitude and 7 mill a year is good price for what hes shown. it is a smart move but i understand as a jets fan you dont know whats a good move and whats not. signing wallace for 11+ a year would have been a bad move, brown at 7mill for 6 years is a great move
     
  16. xc944

    xc944 Banned

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    another point which you dont seem to realize now they can use the franchise tag on other players which gives them more options. you get the guys you want done thats the bottom line thats why they dont have many bad years and have been at the top of the league for 20 years.
     
  17. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    I don't see the point of the move with Brown either. We'll have to see the contract to see if it's a real 8 million a year deal or like 14 million over the next 3 with escalators that could take it up and a balloon year at the end that is never happening.
     
    #17 Br4d, Jul 28, 2012
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2012
  18. mj2sexay

    mj2sexay Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,619
    Likes Received:
    8
    Shame the jets really dont have the cap to hand mike Wallace a v-jax like deal. Rumor from the post-gazette is he could be had for as little S a 4th with miami, Indy and Dallas involved. I can't understand why the chargers wouldnt try to involve themselves.
     

Share This Page