Sportsline opinion article on trading TJ to Seattle. Didn't see this around so I thought I would add it to the forums. I just wouldn't want Branch for TJ. http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/11750285 Diner News: Trade bait May 15, 2009 By Michael Lombardi National Football Post Michael Lombardi surveys NFL topics in newspapers from around the country and adds in his own analysis and perspective. We are three weeks removed from the draft, and all teams have had some form of minicamp -- either with just rookies or with the entire team. All teams are now involved in their OTAs, and we are starting to learn from local beat writers which players are looking good in practices. So this is the perfect time to pick up the phone again and make a few calls, thinking that some teams might need to make a few moves. If I were any team in need of a part left tackle, part tight end (i.e., blocking tight end), I would call the Denver Broncos. On Thursday, I wrote about the Buffalo Bills, explaining how they have a huge void at blocking tight end and suggesting they call the Broncos to explore the possibility of trading for Daniel Graham. Well, the Bills are not the only team that could benefit from adding this kind of player to their roster. The Eagles, for example, would really make an impact if they had Graham. He would allow Brent Celek to be the tight end to make plays in the passing game and would also give them a strong side run game. Graham, not Tony Scheffler, would make a huge difference for the Eagles. Scheffler is similar to the other tight ends currently on the Eagles' roster. Denver drafted Richard Quinn, whose forte is blocking, at the bottom of the second round. Because he's a second-rounder, Quinn is certain to make the team, so trading Graham is plausible for the Broncos. There are more teams in need of a blocker than just the Bills and Eagles. The Jets and Bengals also need to improve in this area if they expect their receiving tight ends to be factors in the offense. Adding Graham to the Jets would boost Dustin Keller, just as adding him to the Bengals would be an upgrade over Reggie Kelly and allow Chase Coffman to be a factor right away in the passing game. If I were working for the Redskins, I would call Jacksonville about the availability of right offensive tackle Tony Pashos. The Redskins' offensive line is a mess. It's old and injury prone, making the prospect of a successful 2009 season seem unlikely. Worse, there are no signs of finding reinforcements in the preseason. Jacksonville signed former Eagle Tra Thomas this offseason to be the starter at left tackle, then drafted two more tackles in the first two rounds -- Eugene Monroe and Eben Britton. They now have three tackles besides Pashos who are locks to make the team. Even though Pashos has been a starter, he does have limitations in his athletic ability and the type of protection schemes the offense must run. Were this the Redskins' offense of old under Joe Gibbs featuring mostly slide protection, Pashos would fit perfectly. Pashos is the kind of player that 'Skins offensive line guru Joe Bugel would love -- tough, gritty, hard working and willing to do whatever he needs to be successful. The 'Skins can't feel that current right tackle Jon Jansen can play in all 16 games from an injury and performance standpoint. They must find an alternative, and I doubt it will be former Buffalo Bills first rounder Mike Williams of Texas. If I were working for the Seahawks, I would call the Jets about the availability of running back Thomas Jones. I know, I know, the Seahawks have the other Jones, Julius, currently handling the running back chores. But when does having Julius Jones on a roster mean you'll get a consistent and reliable runner? Besides his durability issues, when does he give you a sense of comfort and confidence that he can play the whole season and be productive? Last year, sharing time with Maurice Morris, Jones had almost 700 yards rushing and played in 15 games. It's clear he needs someone to help him handle the reps and not place the full burden squarely on his shoulders. That other back is not T.J. Duckett. Duckett is a short-yardage runner but lacks quickness to make plays in the middle of the field. He did help the Seahawks convert third-and-1 at an 85 percent rate, finishing third in the NFL. But he's not the kind of player to supplement Julius. Trading for Thomas Jones would give the Seahawks another runner to share time with his brother and beef up the running game. The Jets desperately needs a wide receiver to replace the departed Laveranues Coles. The Seahawks -- depending on the health of some players and the talent level of the younger wideouts, notably third-round pick Deon Butler -- might have an extra receiver. For example, Deion Branch might be expendable after Seattle's receivers last year failed to make plays, partly because of health and partly because they finished 30th in the NFL in dropped passes. If healthy, Branch would give the Jets a veteran receiver capable of helping a rookie quarterback. Both teams might benefit from this trade.
I'm not a huge fan of Deon Branch, but with our WR corps being one of the weakest positions on the team, I'm sure it wouldn't hurt to have him. I think this is just the writers opinion and he's not basing it on any rumor that the Jets have interest in Branch
Just to be clear, this isn't a rumor, it's just a National Football Post writer who (wrongly) believes that since Seattle has likely soured on Branch and the Jets don't want to give Jones more money, maybe a deal makes sense. Where he's wrong is in thinking the Jets would want an overrated, aging wideout with an injury history, and the Seahawks believe their running back situation would improve by adding an older player who wants more money. It's a goofy idea with no merit and no possibility of happening.
If you are talking about Ronald Curry that was on the raiders i would do it just to get rid of the headache so we can concentrate on signing Leon
curry is of higher value.. that's not a fair trade. Jones for branch makes sense. But its not something I would want to happen
deon branch sucks no way he comes close to providing the numbers tj put up. the jets are moving forwards not backwards and trading him to seattle should not happen. curry is unproven.
No Way!! ...Branch is not worth much at this point, Seattle made a poor decision when they signed him from the Pats 3 years ago
Moving forwards would be getting rid of the 31 year old running back and letting the rookie get some playing time, with leon splitting carries.
Thomas Jones would fit well in Seattle. He may STFU playing on the same team as his brother. But Deion Branch? He has no market value now. Seattle would have to give the Jets a pick, this is not a straight trade.
We can't keep trading away our draft picks. And correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think we can trade away our 2nd round pick because it's tied in the Sheppard trade. I know we can just no resign Sheppard and owe Philly nothing, but this is not something we need to get into right now unless we get rid of that 2nd rounder.
why all the hate for tj the dude led this team last year similiar to curtis martin like and you so called fans want to trade him? lets get real here
Branch might be the most injuried player in the NFL the last 3-4 years. The guy can NEVER stay on the field, and when he finally does come back from injury he gets injuried a game or two later. NO WAY, our front office is not stupid anymore. We can talk all the TJ trade rumors all we want until August, but I'll say it over and over again. TJ is going nowhere.
