Should the Jets consider trading up to get Ingram?

Discussion in 'Draft' started by southparkfanciz, Mar 1, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 2 of 2
  1. inSANITy

    inSANITy Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    2,808
    Likes Received:
    0
    but thats not what is being asked... would you trade up for him
     
    #21 inSANITy, Mar 1, 2011
  2. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    wait, how did this get move from the Jets forum to the Draft forum and not the cesspool?

    This is a cesspool thread
     
    #22 NDmick, Mar 1, 2011
  3. ........

    ........ Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bahahaha...

    If Mambo bashes your trade idea, you know you've written the worst thread in TGG history.
     
    #23 ........, Mar 1, 2011
  4. LoyalJetsFan

    LoyalJetsFan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2004
    Messages:
    3,566
    Likes Received:
    0
    Someone please close this thread.
     
    #24 LoyalJetsFan, Mar 1, 2011
  5. LoyalJetsFan

    LoyalJetsFan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2004
    Messages:
    3,566
    Likes Received:
    0
    Fuck that!! Go Ditka and draft Newton!!! I know we have Sanchez, but I don't want the Bills to get Newton!!!
     
    #25 LoyalJetsFan, Mar 1, 2011
  6. WW85

    WW85 MOCKERATOR
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    13,483
    Likes Received:
    959
    First, I'm against trading up in rd 1 of this draft. If we did trade up into 10- 15 range...it should be for JJ Watt....not Mark Ingram.

    News broke today that LT is staying...with Greene and McK we will be fine for a year. Next year I would have no issue looking at another RB in the early rounds.
     
    #26 WW85, Mar 1, 2011
  7. BK_Jetsfan

    BK_Jetsfan New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    4,424
    Likes Received:
    0
    FIRST fucking time I've laughed all day! Well played!
     
    #27 BK_Jetsfan, Mar 1, 2011
  8. Vorrecht

    Vorrecht Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    6,056
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm going to bump this thread when Shonn Greene is in the Pro Bowl.
     
    #28 Vorrecht, Mar 1, 2011
  9. Green Hurricane

    Green Hurricane Footsteps Falco

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2003
    Messages:
    7,728
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG]
     
    #29 Green Hurricane, Mar 1, 2011
  10. bojanglesman

    bojanglesman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2009
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't claim to know a lot about college prospects, but even I know this is retarded.
     
    #30 bojanglesman, Mar 1, 2011
  11. bigcotch

    bigcotch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2010
    Messages:
    526
    Likes Received:
    0
    That picture is fucking Hysterical!

    By the way, Metallica is for wierdos.
     
    #31 bigcotch, Mar 1, 2011
  12. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is a terrible idea.
     
    #32 624, Mar 1, 2011
  13. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    He's still got a lot to prove.

    I like Greene, but I'm not wholly opposed to bringing in a runningback. With the news of LT's return, that's probably out the window, but Greene still has to prove he's a starting NFL runningback. McKnight has proven nothing, and LT is getting older. If there were an elite runningback available that was a great value, I'd definitely consider it, especially if the other options didn't look so great.

    That said...

    Trading up again is stupid. Trading up for a runningback when you want to give Greene another chance to be the guy is dumb. Ingram's a nice player, but Greene/Tomlinson/McKnight is fine. If Ingram was there with our first rounder, I wouldn't completely dismiss him. But trading up for a position that is not a need and a position that is easier to fill than almost any other position on the roster is a bad idea.
     
    #33 Jetfanmack, Mar 1, 2011
  14. CodeGreen

    CodeGreen Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2010
    Messages:
    1,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah, cant really say much else besides that
     
    #34 CodeGreen, Mar 1, 2011
  15. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,995
    Likes Received:
    25,066
    The Jets are going RBBC in 2011 with 3 backs. That will have a significant effect on Greene's ability to put up Pro Bowl stats.
     
    #35 abyzmul, Mar 2, 2011
  16. jetsons

    jetsons Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,140
    Likes Received:
    34
     
    #36 jetsons, Mar 2, 2011
  17. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    Absolutely not. Ingram will go higher than he should.
     
    #37 Yisman, Mar 2, 2011
  18. WW85

    WW85 MOCKERATOR
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    13,483
    Likes Received:
    959
    I don't often close threads in the draftforum, this is an exception.
     
    #38 WW85, Mar 2, 2011
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 2 of 2
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page