It doesn't matter what the poll says, most average fans see the big fantasy #s and think a ceratin player is better than another. If you dig deeper than just the fantasy #s the 2 aren't close. It's Brady by a mile.
Brady is more of a Montana, Manning more of a Marino. I'd take the Montana any day of the week for my team. Stats are wack.
Tom Brady: 14-3 in postseason Peyton Manning : 7-8 TB: 3 SB titles PM: 1 TB: 4 AFC Titles PM: 1 TB: ZERO home playoff losses PM: 3 TB: has never been one and done in postseason PM: One and Done SEVEN times TB: led O to 18 PPG in 3 playoff losses PM: led O to 13.6 PPG in 8 playoff losses TB: NEVER been shut out in postseason PM: Shutout by Jets in 2002
I went push. They both put up numbers, they've both won. They're both legends in the making. I hate them both.
One has elevated his team to win 3 titles, the other has held his team back from winning more than 1 title.
Sorry, translation: almost everybody but me is retarded. There was a way to say that without arbitrarily belittling those people in the poll. You chose the other way. For the record, I voted Brady, but I can see an argument for Manning.
That's an older version of Montana's wife. I think she's better looking than Brady's butterface wife. Brady has done alot better in his dating career than Bundchen.
Of course, given that football is more of a team sport than any other, those aren't necessarily reliable indicators of one player's effect on a team. Perhaps a better one would be: 2008 Patriots: 11 - 5 with a QB who hadn't started a game since high school.
MB: I was wondering why you had Montana's wife in this thread. Of course, there's always: Brady's wife: Manning's wife: If you're going on touched up photos, of course Bundchen's going to have an advantage.
