Here's a link to a site I found with this year's ratings....the Jets aren't looking all that good but I guess with last season;t performance we really didn't earn it....I at least think Vilma should be better ...but look how high they rated D'Brick... http://tsxdata.com/fbgratings/members/viewbyrate.php?team=Jets&sortorder=pos
Well it looks better than I expected... Coleman is a bit overrated, Vilma is underrated.. The OL looks like it should be pretty good though, which is nice because '07 is supposed to have added influence on the OL...
Lol Beamen do you really think thats what they will really be when the game drops.... ea has a ritual of taking the time to release team data and then player data later. The team stuff should come soon, in the meanwhile don't take any stock in those rating b/c unless they stole a copy of madden 07 they just made up the numbers based on everyone's performance.
Adrian Jones a 68???? Wasnt he a high 70's last year? He wasnt bad enough to warrant a 10 point drop.
I disagree with the Brandon Moore, Askew, and the Jones rating. Askew should be a 76 at most, Moore should be a in the low 80's, as should Jones. I don't understand the hate for Jones and Moore. They were the only somewhat consistant ones on the line last year.
Plus I highly doubt those are the real ratings. Because it says the last time the ratings were updated was in 2004, but maybe it is a mistake.
Yeah jones was 75 last year and moore was 82 that is complete wrong and askew isnt a good FB i think 68 in a little low. he sould be 70 or 72.
Chad Pennington is rated once again way too high. I hardly doubt these are correct though. I don't think I have ever seen a 1st rounder rated at 86 before...
ok, so we're gonna have 10 wide receivers on the team this year? i guess we cut eric barton to make room for one of them :lol: you guys cant be serious trusting these ratings
They aren't saying that will be the final roster...they rated everyone that is on the "team" at the moment.
Ellis is underrated 85? he should be high 80s and barrett is given a higher rating than andre dyson. Dewayne Robertson was burnt! (82 overall) but im not exactly argueing that. I think the team icons are always overated see Pennington and Martin. Martin should be high 80's I mean hes getting old but still very decent. I also know ratings dont mean everything in simulation, which i do about 3/4 of the seasons games. I've seen guys with high ratings produce nothing on the field and seen guys in the low 70's have like 12 sacks or 5 picks.
Dude that happens in real life...Erik Coleman as a rookie had 5 INT's and had a ton of tackles. Guys like Ellis whom we expected big things out of last year...produced very little. It happens all the time in real life so I don't see why you would complain about this.
Pennington and Martin Penny should have about 10 injury and 60 arm strength... curtis martin should have a 99 hasbeen rating... and the chiefs are gonna win the super bowl b/c LJ (I didn't write that, obviously...one of my douche bag friends that likes the Chiefs for some reason, typed that when I was in another room.)
ppssst no willie roaf the other lg retired i think and umm where is tony richardson????? Lj will suck this year you heard it here
