i assume J-vilz means Jon Vilma.....well a 94 isn't bad...but they could have done him better ... and btw, ratings won't be out for quite some time so whereever you heard that from > it's false
Yea. I cant wait I have to wait so long for these ratings. It does make for great threads though when Rating Season comes around.
The Ratings haven't been released yet, not even close. Whatever site you read it on, if there even was a site - was bogus.
Except maybe the rosters! Maybe they'll come to their senses and make Simms and Carnell 95 overalls already.
Carnell I could see as a high 80 low 90... Simms will be a mid 80 at best. I know you were intentionally being homeristic but that is my take on where those guys should belong. If Vilma isn't higher then a 94 I'm gunna be pissed... he led the league in tackles and at times he was the only player stopping the run for us. He speed, acc, and agi should be within the top 5 of LBs in our league.
cadillac i would have 83-84 he started off on fire but tapered off sims i would have high 70s low 80s how low would u guys have cmart??? and one for us aussies wat would ben graham be?
Ben Graham better be in the 90s with his kicking power in the mid to high 90s. Curtis should be around an 85 but he will have terrible inj and tough ratings and he should be like CP in 06 where no matter how hard you try to keep him healthy he gets hurt anyway.
carnells not gonna be a 90, at most he'll be an 89. There not gonna make him much better than kevin jones was when the year began