Jet's Cap space revised down for 2007

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by JetFighter, Mar 9, 2007.

  1. JetFighter

    JetFighter Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    Messages:
    843
    Likes Received:
    31
    From NFL.com Pat Kirwin article...

    SALARY-CAP ADJUSTMENTS
    Finally, the salary-cap adjustments have been made and teams know how much space they have. The salary cap was set at $109 million per team but adjustments for each team had to be made for incentives earned and not earned.

    If a team had been charged in the 2006 salary cap for a likely-to-be-earned incentive and the player never earned that incentive, then the club gets the salary-cap space back in 2007. With that in mind, the teams with the most adjusted space are Minnesota ($118 million), Kansas City ($117.5 million), Jacksonville ($117.5 million), New Orleans ($115.5 million), and Cleveland ($115.4 million).

    On the other side of the coin, teams that had not-likely-to-be-earned incentives that didn't count against the 2006 cap but were earned by players during the 2006 season adjusts the 2007 cap down from $109 million. Teams seeing their cap space shrink include Tennessee ($105.4 million), the Jets ($105.8 million), Miami ($106.3 million), Pittsburgh ($106.3 million), and San Diego ($106.4 million).

    It's not a bad thing, especially if a player produced more than expected. However, it does take upward of $4 million of the 2007 space away from a team's effort to compete this season.
     
  2. JetsIn2004

    JetsIn2004 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    11,912
    Likes Received:
    0
    In theory it means they got 4M more last yr so it all evens out.

    Even though the Jets free room wasn't the highest going into free agency, they had a LOT of guys signed already so they had more room per player needed if that makes sense.
     
  3. vilmatic

    vilmatic Active Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    12
    I think Tangini has made clear that they're not going to spend money because we have money to spend, we're going to invest wisely and build a team for the long haul. I'm betting this means that we'll never be bumping up against the salary cap as long as they're in charge. Therefore: salary cap, schmalary cap
     

Share This Page