Jets Can't Sign Free Agents?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by TurkJetFan, Jan 11, 2010.

  1. TurkJetFan

    TurkJetFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    12,472
    Likes Received:
    2,240
    I just heard that the Jets cannot sign free agents in the offseason assuming there is no CBA because they made it to the final 8???

    Reported by WFAN
     
  2. MobiusOne28

    MobiusOne28 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,979
    Likes Received:
    0
    They can only sign as many FAs as they let go now that they're in the final 8.
     
  3. Footballgod214

    Footballgod214 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    15,285
    Likes Received:
    6,132
    rhodes, gholston, clemens = 3 new free agents for next season, plus jenks and leon coming back, plus our 32 round pic in the draft.

    we're set for 2010
     
  4. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    We get Jenkins and Washington back, it will be like picking up two big FA's.
     
  5. MBGreen

    MBGreen Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm not concerned.....we should be building through the draft anyways.
     
  6. nyjetsrule

    nyjetsrule Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Messages:
    10,379
    Likes Received:
    7
    Yeah this is the year we just needed to resign our own guys anyways.

    i said it before only a handful of guys i would consider letting go

    Faneca, Woody, Clemens, Rhodes

    I would rather keep rhodes unless we get a major steal of a deal from him. clemens is already out the door, and Woody and Faneca we can't ditch both, and their age is troubling, we could easily keep both at their current salaries but i would like to see some restructuring done with faneca, our highest paid, and yet worst lineman this year.
     
  7. donkey

    donkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,307
    Likes Received:
    1,977
    That can't pass without a :beer:
     
  8. Kris 15

    Kris 15 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    16,735
    Likes Received:
    1,499
    There will be slim pickings in the FA pool this year with most of the younger players not qualifying for unrestricted free agency under the uncapped rules. We don't really need to make any big moves in free agency due to the past couple of offseasons, so we're in a position to just replace whoever we lose and draft for more depth.
     
  9. ace_o_spades

    ace_o_spades New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    If there's no cap, who cares about restructuring? We're probably not gonna be able to sign any big ticket free agents and we're picking in the 20's in the draft (hopefully 32 :jets:) so we're not gonna be adding any huge salaries.
     
  10. nyjetsrule

    nyjetsrule Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Messages:
    10,379
    Likes Received:
    7
    true there is no cap this year, but in 2011 there comes a cap... and we would be looking at cutting quite a few guys with the constantly escalating salaries that they have. we need to keep this core together, and realise that guys deals will be up following 2010, or shortly there after namely Mangold, Brick, Revis and Harris. We have to start planning to bring back our core....

    Oh that doesnt even count that after next year, Leon and Edwards RFA deals they get this offseason will be up and we have to pay them as well
     
  11. ScotsJet

    ScotsJet Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2004
    Messages:
    7,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Rhodes and Gholston aren't free agents.
     
  12. Murrell2878

    Murrell2878 Lets go JETS!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    24,478
    Likes Received:
    896
    They'll get a new CBA deal done. There's too much at stake.
     
  13. All Star

    All Star Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,054
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bingo.

    And Isn't it you have to match the contract your leaving free agents sign?

    For example if Clemens signs a 1 year $2 million contract doesn't the free agent we sign get limited to that contract?
     
  14. ScotsJet

    ScotsJet Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2004
    Messages:
    7,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pretty much, so far as I can work out.
     
  15. gustoonarmy

    gustoonarmy 2006-2007 TGG.com Best International Poster of the

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,174
    Likes Received:
    160
    Leon + Jenks = 3 :beer:
     
  16. tpjets62

    tpjets62 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2003
    Messages:
    871
    Likes Received:
    0
    Im thinking if there is no cap, that would be a good year to restructure some of these big contracts and take the hit now. And players like gholston we can release and that contract (cap wise) is gone. Obviously its going to cost Woody a bit of money in a small time frame, but being a business man and knowing he can get our future cap hits cleaned up now, Ill bet you several of our big ticket players could get a big paycheck this year.
     
  17. ........

    ........ Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Guys, we have to win this week before we're restricted by the one for one rule. Only the final four teams have that restriction. The other 4 in the Final 8 are only restricted by money. They get one big ticket FA and unlimited small salary FAs. We really won't have the ability to sign "keeper" free agents at the higher price tag anyway.
     
  18. KOZ

    KOZ Totally Addicted

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Messages:
    7,609
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is absolutely no reason to consider moving Woody at the end of this season. His level of play has not dropped at all, when compared to someone like Faneca. He's quite durable, not prone to injury and seems to be a pretty big presence in the locker room. He stays...
     
  19. tpjets62

    tpjets62 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2003
    Messages:
    871
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would think so. You read both sides of the story and there a pros and cons to both sides, but they all know they have a cash cow. Even if its some type of extension for now, I just cant see them bringing in such drastic changes in this economic climate. They screw things up and start pissing off the fan base, they could take a real hit. I think enough fans are already pissed about tickets prices, game day costs and anything that's licensed though the NFL.
     
  20. brothermoose

    brothermoose Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7,382
    Likes Received:
    35
    Faneca is playing like Faneca right now. Not that he did that all year, but t is hard to imagine a scenario where he would be let go, nor do I think he would be willing to take a pay cut. Yes he is overpaid, but I don't see him going anywhere next year. I do doubt he makes it to the end of his contract though.

    Woody is making about what he is worth. He stays.

    Seeing as how the key to offensive line is cohesion and continuity, there is no way we dismantle the O-line responsible for the #1 Rushing Attack in the NFL.
     

Share This Page