Jaguars to let MJD test market - ESPN

Discussion in 'National Football League' started by neid92, Dec 31, 2013.

  1. neid92

    neid92 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    1,035
    Likes Received:
    139
  2. New England Patriots

    New England Patriots Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,041
    Likes Received:
    120
  3. 101GangGreen101

    101GangGreen101 2018 Thread of the Year Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    22,232
    Likes Received:
    12,246
    MJD is starting to break down, 3 straight years of 300 carries (2009-2011) - does not body well for his future. I would give him maybe 100 carries at the most, 150. He is an old 28.

    He would be a good 3rd down back though - would sign for cheap.
     
  4. soxxx

    soxxx Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Messages:
    14,890
    Likes Received:
    518
    He is pretty much shot. I wouldnt mind it though if he came in similar to L.T.
     
  5. soxxx

    soxxx Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Messages:
    14,890
    Likes Received:
    518
    Pretty much the 3rd down back aspect justifies it.
     
  6. macbk

    macbk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2004
    Messages:
    18,367
    Likes Received:
    1,825
    MJD is only 28?! Thought he was much older for some reason.
     
  7. 74

    74 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2012
    Messages:
    7,968
    Likes Received:
    4,119
    Definitely not. Draft a RB if you need one. It is the stupidest position to overpay for.
     
  8. Barcs

    Barcs Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,776
    Likes Received:
    267
    Actually, it's rare to say this in a recent off season, but I am perfectly happy with our current RB core going into 2014. Ivory, Powell, Goodson is solid. No need to bring in MJD. I don't think we should overpay a vet that has already left his prime. We are building to the future. I doubt it happens unless he comes in dirt cheap, which I don't see. We need WRs and TEs, not backs.

    Also we have a goal line back. His name is Richardson.
     
    #8 Barcs, Jan 1, 2014
    Last edited: Jan 1, 2014
  9. LongIslandBlitz

    LongIslandBlitz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2011
    Messages:
    13,325
    Likes Received:
    4,083
    We can use a speed back for certain situations similar to what Goodson was suppose to be but this guys gonna want more then he is worth
     
  10. BrowningNagle

    BrowningNagle Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    29,425
    Likes Received:
    30,623
    He would be a very good signing IMO. I think he can be had for a fairly favorable deal as well.

    There's some tread on those tires but he's still a good RB. He's also a very motivated individual who is going to come here with a chip on his shoulder. That's the type of guy you want to sign. He would run his ass off here. Some of you are comparing it to the L.T. signing but I think it would be more like when they brought in Thomas Jones.
     
  11. nyjunc

    nyjunc 2008 TGG Bryan Cox "Most Argumentative" Award Winn

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    53,044
    Likes Received:
    1,435
    I think we are set at RB, we have a nice 1-2 punch w/ Powell and ivory and I think Goodson will help us catching passes next year. I am more worried about the WRs.
     
  12. CJLang

    CJLang Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    5,497
    Likes Received:
    549
    Not sure if the Jets are a fit, but from what little I saw of the Jags this year, he still has gas in the tank.

    Put him on a team that actually has a legit passing game and he could do OK IMO.
     
  13. nyjunc

    nyjunc 2008 TGG Bryan Cox "Most Argumentative" Award Winn

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    53,044
    Likes Received:
    1,435
    I think he can be effective as a change of pace back, I wouldn't want him to have to carry the load at this point.
     

Share This Page