No, a question was asked here and you have selected how you want to answer it even after being told more than once the original claim was that Wilson could move to the top half of the league. You then decide for yourself what metrics are important and run with it - fine again, but don't believe for one second that you are somehow the deciding voice in the matter. That's your opinion - go with it, nobody cares. You get so hung up on being a pain in the ass you lose track of what's going on and misquote. A quotation is properly written with all the words in it, you can't just cut words out of the middle and expect it to mean what it said. Is it ADHD? The statement was "We are talking about the Jets here after all." It was written that way because that's what we are supposed to be talking about in the Jets Forum and in a topic about whether or not the Jets are "vastly improved." (Emphasis added.) It has nothing to do with the history of the franchise although some may care to consider that as well. At least you finally made your position on what you think Wilson can do clear. It shouldn't have been that difficult, but he has to be more than an improved passer, he needs to be an all around improved quarterback. Talk all you want about what Goff is, what he did and how he looks - I don't care about him and he's not relevant to the question of the Jets being improved. It is still to be seen if the Jets have recently drafted any "great" players at all; that will be determined on the playing field as will how Wilson grades out over the next couple of years. Fifty years of history show many of the supposed Jets "greats" were great failures. If and when the change "might possibly" come, we'll all know it.