1 Dallas Clark IND $8 (Bye: 6) 2 Jason Witten DAL $8 (Bye: 6) 3 Antonio Gates SD $8 (Bye: 5) 4 Tony Gonzalez ATL $8 (Bye: 4) 5 Greg Olsen CHI $6 (Bye: 5) 6 Dustin Keller NYJ $6 (Bye: 9) 7 Chris Cooley WAS $5 (Bye: 8) 8 John Carlson SEA $5 (Bye: 7) 9 Kellen Winslow TB $5 (Bye: 8) 10 Owen Daniels HOU $4 (Bye: 10) 11 Kevin Boss NYG $3 (Bye: 10) 12 Visanthe Shiancoe MIN $2 (Bye: 9) 13 Zach Miller OAK $1 (Bye: 9) 14 Brent Celek PHI $1 (Bye: 4) 15 Tony Scheffler DEN $1 (Bye: 7) 16 Heath Miller PIT $1 (Bye: 8) 17 Jeremy Shockey NO $1 (Bye: 5) 18 Bo Scaife TEN (Bye: 7) 19 Anthony Fasano MIA (Bye: 6) 20 Vernon Davis SF (Bye: 6) 21 Martellus Bennett DAL (Bye: 6) 22 Billy Miller NO (Bye: 5) 23 Randy McMichael STL (Bye: 9) 24 Todd Heap BAL (Bye: 7) 25 Donald Lee GB (Bye: 5) 26 Marcedes Lewis JAC (Bye: 7) 27 Desmond Clark CHI (Bye: 5) 28 L.J. Smith BAL (Bye: 7) 29 Jerramy Stevens TB (Bye: 8) 30 Brandon Pettigrew DET (Bye: 7) I know this is Fantasy and not an exact science, but Jeaux said Keller wouldn't be rated anywhere near Zach Miller. He was right...lol
nice to know Keller is already garnering respect. but whats with the money to the side of each player? for instance Keller is worth $6 and miller just has a $1 next to his name, whats that all about?
Thats all that is Fantasy. Probably only reason Keller would be rated higher in Fantasy land, is he had more Tes than Zach Miller last year. In Real football Zach miller is the way better player and he 15 months younger than Dustin Keller. Not to mention Zach Miller is a complete TE(can block and catch) while Keller just a H-back. Your not a Te if you can't block.
Yeah, except ESPN says Keller is worth six times as much dough and he plays for a 9-7 team with a future and not the second worst team in the league over the past 6 years.
actually they are the worst team in the past 6 years. the lions have averaged more wins per season. unless that 0-16 season has changed that --- EDIT: Nope, even with the lions not winning one single game, the Raiders still have lost more games since 2003. Wow. 26 wins for the Lions 24 Wins for the Raiders Back to the Topic - Keller's rookie season has shown he's a pass catching threat in the Dallas Clark mold. Couldn't be happier. But he's one cog in the wheel on the offense.
Facts who put up better numbers last year Zach Miller or Dustin Keller. Who is a TE and who is a H back Who is 15 months older than the other prospect. The younger player (Zach Miller) is already better than the older player(dustin Keller) and just wait till he gets to his age.(will be even more better than him)
Age only dosen't seem to matter to the Jets(Pouha, Keller and Now Shonn Greene) What you see is usually what your going to get with an older prospect. A young player still has time to mature and get alot better. For that reason older prospect tend to drop in the draft.
So are you denying that H-Backs have places in the NFL? And also, I'll pick a player one year older everytime over any DHB, McFadden, Russell not-readies.
First off when the younger player (Zach miller) has better numbers than the older player(Dustin Keller) already , than its not that hard to say who the better player is. If Russell numbers were better than Manning and Brady now,(which they aren't) than I could make that arguement. Since they aren't, Jamarcus Rus%ell isn't as good as both right now. Thats right now, and whose to say hes not better than both in the near future. Only time will tell on that one.
We'll see who has the better numbers when this year Keller is the clear-cut #2 passing option. Last year, it was either Ronald Curry or Miller, MAYBE sprinkle in a little Chafe Scratchings (3.9, 6'6 245)...
There is always a place in the NFl for H-backs. (where did I ever say there wasn't) Heck Raiders have one marcel Reece 6'2 240 4.42 speed They just shouldn't be called TE's. To be a TE you must be able to block. Something we know Keller can't do. When you find a complete TE like Zach Miller, you found a rare thing in today game. Your offense is less predictable as a defense not sure, if its going to be a running play or a pass. Im not even going to address your Mcfadden, DHB, and Russell comment. Its laughable and not even worth wasting my time trying to explain to you.
Only way Keller has better numbers than Zach Miller, if Miller missses the season with a injury.(thats the only way) Both play 16 games and without a doubt zach Miller will have the way better numbers. Im so sure of this that if Keller has better numbers than Zach Miller, I want to be permantely banned from ganggreene.
That second line is how we always feel about everything you say, but you keep coming back. They suck man, they are laughable He's a TE because he lines up there and catches balls, not because Raiderjoe is trying to defend the glory of blocking
How the fuck is Zach Miller not #1? Doesn't ESPN realize what's coming in September? Oakland Raiders 2009: 16-0 Jam Russell 10,000 yd season. Miller is probably going to catch 2000 of those yards... probably 250 receptions. ESPN obviously has no clue.
First you say keller a H-back and they have a place in the NFl. NOw your trying to claim hes a TE. What is your position. What do you think Mike Ditka would say about this.
after the season is when you will be in recluse anyway because of the top 5 draft pick the lady raiders just earned again
