Draft depends on Pennington

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by AtlantaJet, Feb 24, 2006.

  1. AtlantaJet

    AtlantaJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2003
    Messages:
    604
    Likes Received:
    562
    If Pennington is on the roster at the time of the draft the Jets will not take a QB in the first round..they will probaly take Brody Croyle(sp) in a later round. The first round will then be BPA which will likely be AJ Hawk. If Pennington is gone it will be Cutler or even Leinart.
     
  2. KY_Jetsfan

    KY_Jetsfan New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    704
    Likes Received:
    0
    How will it be Leinart unless we trade up? Leinart would have to break his throwing arm to fall to us.
     
  3. winstonbiggs

    winstonbiggs 2008/2009 TGG Bill Parcells "Most Respected" Award

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,786
    Likes Received:
    2
    The Jets are making an offer to Chad to reduce the cap hit. It should have not impact our draft at all. I can't see Chad at his age and at least a year away from rehabing enough to see action ever being the starting QB on the Jets again.
     
  4. MParty7441

    MParty7441 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    6,251
    Likes Received:
    73
    We arent drafting hawk, I hate that everyone is thinking we will.....I just dont see it happening its gonna be a QB or Ferg.
     
  5. Section 227. Row 5

    Section 227. Row 5 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    12,562
    Likes Received:
    6
    This is correct, IMO. The one issue has nothing to do with the other. If Chad restructures, how does that eliminate our QB needs? It doesn't. All you've got is a restructured, severely injured QB on your hands who helped out the Cap by restructuring. Now, somebody else still has to take the field. But more important, somebody needs to be groomed to take over the starting position.

    One fantastic RB and three excellent QB's available in the first round and we're sitting at #4. Hmmm... I wonder what we'll do? This should not be a difficult choice, fellas.
     
  6. O'Brien7

    O'Brien7 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    403
    Likes Received:
    0
    'We' huh. Did you have a meeting with the GM or something? How do you know what they would do if Chad stays? Why not Hawk, especially if the Jets go to a 3-4 defense? Decent QB's and good O & D lineman can be found in the middle rounds. The only position that does not have much depth is CB, which is a position the Jets need to address since Law is gone.
     
  7. jaywayne12

    jaywayne12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    7,991
    Likes Received:
    1,505
    I believe you and Winston are correct.

    The only thing that Im thinking is that you have a defensive philosophy being brought in. The defense is more complete than the offense..getting the defense to where EM wants it to be will happen a lot faster than the offense. Adding a super linebacker to play with Vilma would pretty much complete that position for years to come.

    Since this is a rebuilding process and unless EM/Tannenbaum are completely sold on Cutler, I wouldnt be shocked if they turn their attention to a different position, whether it be offensive line, running back or linebacker.

    I do agree though, Penningtons health will have no input into the final decision.
     
  8. Section 227. Row 5

    Section 227. Row 5 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    12,562
    Likes Received:
    6
    It can happen, and actually, we're okay either way. I think the #4 overall pick has increased in value due mostly to Cutler's rise, not that Ferguson isn't a desirable commodity also. He seems to be promoting and projecting himself pretty well at the combine right now too (Ferguson, that is).

    So, even if we use our pick at #4 or we trade down, we're going to be doing well. I'm okay with using the #4 right where it is and I'm okay with trading down, knowing it's viewed as a more valuable pick now than it was, say, a month ago. Can't wait for late April...
     
  9. Chadwick I

    Chadwick I Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2004
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    0
    Typically outside linebacker is not considered an impact position. We need a player who will be great in a position that will sway the flow of the game. A quarterback has the ball in his hands every play. A left tackle protects the QB's blindside during pass plays. A running back will get the ball 20-30 times a game. How many plays is an outside linebacker going to have in a game? Ten tackles is a good game. There is not the same amount of impact at that position, and with our offense in such a bad state, I don't see us not addressing it with our first pick.
     
  10. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    I have said before even if we do keep Chad, I still think we should draft a QB.
     
  11. championjets69

    championjets69 2008/2009 TGG Darksider Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Messages:
    17,353
    Likes Received:
    866
    Do U wise people realize that NOBODY will know #10 condition until JULY when he will be allowed to test the shoulder?
     
  12. dabrowsk1

    dabrowsk1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    2,519
    Likes Received:
    7

    What are you smoking and can I have some? I would be HIGHLY pissed if the Jets went defense in the first round again. We have dumped all of the top draft choices into the defense the past few years, it is time the offense is addressed and given a shot in the arm.

    CB is the only position without depth??? Mawae might be traded/released, Fanini is gone, Kendall is old and might be released. And who do the Jets have as back-up O-Linemen? Goodwin? Chrebet retired and Williams was released. So the Jets have Coles, Cotchery, McCareins, and no one else at WR. The D-Line and safety positions are thin. Depth has been neglected at the majority of the positions. Another Bradway legacy.
     
  13. lightning

    lightning Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2004
    Messages:
    5,401
    Likes Received:
    1
    It's not about his condition we're talking about, it's about his status on the team. If they can't come to the agreement, who knows he could be cut.
     
  14. championjets69

    championjets69 2008/2009 TGG Darksider Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Messages:
    17,353
    Likes Received:
    866
    OK naturally I thought you were talking about his ability to chuck the rock. The rest is all silliness since it is just plain sheer speculation
     
  15. Mehl-56

    Mehl-56 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,473
    Likes Received:
    240
    I vote Cut him... then try to resign him to league minimum... somehow, I think that will be solution that come to pass...

    Ellis
     
  16. JetsIn2004

    JetsIn2004 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    11,912
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is a much worse situation than restructuring.

    He'd count 12.45M on this year's cap. Not to mention he can get league minimum with any team. I think any team would take a shot on him for league minimum. It wouldn't cost them much. If he can't do it in training camp 2006, they can put him on IR and it costs them 450K.
     
  17. Mehl-56

    Mehl-56 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,473
    Likes Received:
    240
    I'd rather get it overwith... we should just deal with our cap this year. This way next year, we're in a great position to get competitive again in a hurry, instead of trying to be also rans this year. It would be a good BUISNESS decision, somthing that seems to be lost on many a fan.

    sometimes it will get worse before it gets better, much to the shagrin of the faithful

    Ellis
     
  18. plasticsloth

    plasticsloth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,741
    Likes Received:
    126
    if he and the jets do indeed come to an agreement with chad in the draft, IMO it would make the most sense to trade down and get deangelo williams and then maybe winston justice or max-gean giles. and then in the third round get brodie croyle. I think we should go with cutler/young/leinart only if chad is gone, not worth having a multi-million dollar qb sit on the bench(chad or the draft pick)
     
  19. fenwyr

    fenwyr Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    0
    That would be my dream come true.
     
  20. The Lord

    The Lord Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,572
    Likes Received:
    0
    WHATTT?????

    Everything you say in this post is incorrect. First of all, the Jets can't cut Penny. It will be a huge cap hit, and i think they are ready to give him one more shot. So if the Jets have Penny, they will take Brody Croyle? This is like Joe Namath with not just gimpy knees but gimpy legs and gimpy chest and all that. This guy is like injury machine. Remind you of anyone?
    I don't think there is any question that if we don't take a QB in the first round then we take D'Brick. Its the biggest need.
    Even if Penny is on the roster I would not be at all surprised if Cutler was drafted anyways.

    And how can you say the whole draft depends on Penny? He may have a very important position, but games are won and lost in the trenches. Whether Penny is here or not does not control the draft.

    JEEZ!
     

Share This Page