Don Banks 2013 mockdraft 2.0

Discussion in 'Draft' started by S.HOLMES.10, Feb 27, 2013.

  1. legler82

    legler82 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    13,342
    Likes Received:
    7,273
  2. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    I would guess that if it fell that way the Jets might take Jarvis Jones. Patterson is interesting but they already have one raw WR they are trying to develop.
     
  3. Axel3419

    Axel3419 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,203
    Likes Received:
    970
    I'd still take Moore at the 9
     
  4. Matt4776

    Matt4776 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2010
    Messages:
    841
    Likes Received:
    128
    I don't have enough posts to make my own mock, so I figured I'd put mine here. Let me know what you guys think!

    Trade Revis for SF 1st, KC 2nd
    Trade NYJ 1 (9) for Steelers 1 (17) and 2 (49) to select Patterson, WR, LSU to replace Wallace
    Trade David Harris and a 6th to Buffalo for a 3rd round pick.

    I don't feel like writing out each individual let-go/re-sign, so if you see him on the roster, assumed re-sign, if you don't, assume we let him go.

    1 (PIT): Ezekiel Ansah*
    1 (SF): Alec Ogletree, ILB
    2 (KC): Matt Elam, S
    2 (NYJ): Giovanni Bernard, RB
    2 (PIT): Tavon Austin, WR
    3 (BUF): Brennan Williams, OL
    3 (NYJ): Khaseem Greene, OLB
    4 (NYJ): Tyrann Mathieu, CB
    5 (NYJ): Lonnie Pryor, FB
    7 (NYJ): Jake Stoneburner, TE

    *If by draft-time after all of the combine hype dies down, it appears evident that Ansah will go in the top 10, I would draft Moore, and if he's gone, I'd trade the pick for 1st rounder from a bad team next year.

    I see us switching to more of a 46 (although there will obviously always be some 3-4 as we run a hybrid)

    QB: Sanchez, Quinn, McElroy
    RB: Bernard, Powell, McKnight
    FB: Pryor
    TE: Keller, Cumberland, Stoneburner
    WR: Holmes, Austin, Kerley, Hill
    LT: Ferguson
    LG: Ducasse
    C: Mangold
    RG: Howard
    RT: Williams


    DE: Ansah/Moore/Plug stop-gap (if both are taken)
    DT: Coples
    NT: Ellis
    DT: Wilkerson
    MLB: Ogletree
    OLB1: Davis
    OLB2: Greene
    CB1: Cromartie
    CB2: Wilson
    Nickel: Lankster
    Dime: Mathieu**
    FS: Elam
    SS: Landry

    KR/PR: Mathieu

    **I think Mathieu has a shot to strive as the nickel back. His weaker tacking ability and size concerns me, especially when teams are gonna be try to beating us short in the passing game. At the same time, however, I think Mathieu's ball-hawking ability can be best served trying to anticipate those short passing routes. If there's one person I trust with how to handle CBs, it's Rex.

    Anyway, I'm really happy with the way this turned out. We add some much needed speed and youth (and most of all talent) to our front-7. We (obviously) lose some depth at corner losing arguably the best CB of all time, but add a dynamic playmaker in Mathieu, and add a free-safety with immediate pro-bowl potential to go along with Landry.

    On offense, we bolster two OL positions by moving Howard to RG and drafting Williams, who has fallen due to injury. We get that WCO RB we so desperately need in Bernard, while adding another dynamic playmaker to the WR position in Austin. TE remains for the most part unchanged (albeit resigning Keller may prove to be difficult).

    This leaves us next year with only one real hole to fill- the QB position.
     
  5. PennyPeak

    PennyPeak New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would LOVE Patterson. We need playmakers on O. This guy has special, game-breaking ability. He's 6-foot-3 and has moves like a scat back.
     
  6. snipes824

    snipes824 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    129
    Likes Received:
    0
    I do not want another combine WR.
     
  7. lamont_jordan_rules

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2004
    Messages:
    293
    Likes Received:
    1
    it makes no sense ... why in his 1st mock there are no wr's off the board and he has us pick olb/de mingo ... in his 2nd mock mingo is still on the board, dion jordan is the only olb/de gone and now he has us going wr? what's changed ??? ... a bunch of the top olb/de prospects put up impressing numbers at the combine ... that is where we should go




    ljr
     
  8. JetsFan

    JetsFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2002
    Messages:
    6,287
    Likes Received:
    691
    Based on who is left in the board in this mock at #9, we would take Star Lotulelei, not Patterson.
     
  9. Harpua

    Harpua Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    8,791
    Likes Received:
    2,311
    Untill teams find out more about his heart condition he is not getting taken in the top ten. Medical issues are really making mocking the draft rough this year.
     
  10. Zach

    Zach Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    9,490
    Likes Received:
    2,302
    1. Trading Revis for 1/2 would be ideal
    2. Trading down doesn't seem likely - who would try trading up, and why?
     
  11. themorey

    themorey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Messages:
    2,080
    Likes Received:
    1,788
    The niners may not trade for Revis but they may bundle some of their 12 tradeable picks to move up for a player they want.
     

Share This Page