Brooks Bollinger should be our opening day QB

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by supersonic, Feb 28, 2006.

  1. supersonic

    supersonic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    2,178
    Likes Received:
    51
    I hope that nobody on this board has delusions of grandeur that we are actually going to contend next year. There is too much rebuilding this year, especially on the OL. So does it make ANY sense whatsoever to put Pennington or some rookie behind center to have his confidence crushed? Brooks is mobile, and he can win some games. Plus, it would not be crushing if he got hurt. Let Penny fully heal. Didn't we learn our lesson last year? Let Brooks take the lumps until the new OL gels.
     
  2. Electric Cedric 34

    Electric Cedric 34 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Please, say you're kidding, PLEASE.
     
  3. RobA

    RobA 2005-2007 TGG.com Most Optimistic Award Winner

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Messages:
    8,746
    Likes Received:
    299
    Don't be so down on our team. Bollinger gives us no chance in 06, you play to win and you play to contend by playing your best players and trying to win now.
     
  4. JetsIn2004

    JetsIn2004 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    11,912
    Likes Received:
    0
    You know what... If Bollinger was some rookie who gave us a chance to win in the future (>= 2007) and could gain from the experience... then heck, I'd be 100% on board. However, Bollinger is a dead end. We do not gain a thing by playing him.
     
  5. supersonic

    supersonic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    2,178
    Likes Received:
    51

    What do we gain by putting our 60M dollar QB behind a patch work OL?
     
  6. thegoldengod

    thegoldengod Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,689
    Likes Received:
    9
    pennington can win games...even with the shitty line and a torn rotator cuff
    im all for starting someone else the first few games if pennington isnt 100%
     
  7. supersonic

    supersonic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    2,178
    Likes Received:
    51
    I am not down on our team at all. Just realistically speaking there is no way with a rookie HC and so many roster changes and schme changes that we can be a contender. Is is just not realistic. Anyway, you shold not be so down on Brooks. When we started to play Cedric and had some from or running game, he did not look half bad. Plus QBs almost make a dramatic improvement from year one to year two. It makes sense on many levels.
     
  8. Electric Cedric 34

    Electric Cedric 34 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pennington with 1 arm > Bollinger.

    Bollinger's a small, inexperienced QB who's had good throws, yes, but also has had some terribly, terribly, awful ones.
     
  9. FITM

    FITM 2006 TGG.com Best Photoshop Artist Award Winner

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    Messages:
    5,550
    Likes Received:
    0
    To see if Pennington can still throw.
     
  10. supersonic

    supersonic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    2,178
    Likes Received:
    51
    For all intents and purposes he was a rookie QB behind a battered OL with a team and a coach that had packed it in. Give him a chance under some better circumstances. He improved last year and would continue to improve given the opportunity.
     
  11. FITM

    FITM 2006 TGG.com Best Photoshop Artist Award Winner

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2005
    Messages:
    5,550
    Likes Received:
    0
    He got me through last year, so he definitaly deserves a spot on this roster. And with no doubt, he deserves a shot at competing for the starting job. Odds are against he'll win, but he deserves it.
     
  12. supersonic

    supersonic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    2,178
    Likes Received:
    51
    We all know he can QB and we can see if he can throw in camp. Why throw a guy comming off 2 cuff injuries to the wolves?
     
  13. thegoldengod

    thegoldengod Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,689
    Likes Received:
    9
    chad is a leader
    bollinger is not a leader
     
  14. supersonic

    supersonic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    2,178
    Likes Received:
    51
    yes, we all know that. that is exactly why we dont want to put our leader behind a patch work line until he is 1000% ready. Because if he hurts his shoulder again there is a 100% chance we have no leader and are left with a huge cap figure and nothing to show for it.
     
  15. thegoldengod

    thegoldengod Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,689
    Likes Received:
    9
    if he hurts himself again then he clearly will be replaced in the next draft...maybe even this one
     
  16. supersonic

    supersonic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    2,178
    Likes Received:
    51
    But if we allow him to heal and let the line gel there is a better chance that we keep him healthy. And when he is healthy his is one of the best in the league. What make you think we are going replace him so easily?
     
  17. crazylion26

    crazylion26 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,239
    Likes Received:
    0
    absolutely rediculous. cant even respond... I'm shocked right now
     
  18. supersonic

    supersonic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    2,178
    Likes Received:
    51
    So you think it is better to throw our 60M dollar QB behind a patch work line comming off an 2nd cuff injury without even a full year to heal?? Have you ever had surgery to the ligaments in your shoulder? I have. It takes AT LEAST a year. It is like we don't learn from history. Let the guy f#(%ing heal.
     
  19. crazylion26

    crazylion26 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,239
    Likes Received:
    0
    As a matter of fact, YES, I DO. Common sense, scroll up and look at all the other responses. Were in a rebuilding period. Why would you not throw your future franchise QB in there to GET the experience. You're going to start Bollinger? Then what? Segway our new QB in mid season? Then maybe we can call ourselves Buffalo, or maybe even Miami of '04. You can't do that. It throws off the whole structure of the offense and no one knows week to week what the hells going on. Oh, and one more thing, I forgot that every rookie QB that enters the NFL tears his ligament on opening day... you're right, my mistake.
     
  20. crazylion26

    crazylion26 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,239
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry, I read your response wrong, so I had to go back and edit. No, I agree, you can not start Pennington. But you don't start Brooks either.. Common sense, scroll up and look at all the other responses. Were in a rebuilding period. Why would you not throw your future franchise QB in there to GET the experience. You're going to start Bollinger? Then what? Segway our new QB in mid season? Then maybe we can call ourselves Buffalo, or maybe even Miami of '04. You can't do that. It throws off the whole structure of the offense and no one knows week to week what the hells going on. You draft or trade for a franchise QB and THATS who you start. And as far as a rookie HC.... you should check your stats before stating something like that. His credentials are better than some veteran HCs out there. You make it sound like Gini's fresh out of college!
     
    #20 crazylion26, Feb 28, 2006
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2006

Share This Page