B. Lloyd, B. Jacobs or R. Moss, S. Young?

Discussion in 'Fantasy Football' started by Jetfanmack, Sep 26, 2008.

  1. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    Which is the better side?
    10 yards per point
    6 per TD
    5 pt bonuses at 100, 150, and 200 yards
     
  2. brothermoose

    brothermoose Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7,382
    Likes Received:
    35
    The first one...pats are on bye this week.
     
  3. rmagedon

    rmagedon Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,896
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think either. If B. Jacobs is Brandon Jacobs, RB of the NY Giants, they're on a Bye as well.
     
  4. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    I know they're on byes, I'm not worried about that, this is a trade offer.
     
  5. rmagedon

    rmagedon Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,896
    Likes Received:
    0
    My bad. I thought you meant start. But, yeah, I agree with brothermoose. The first one.
     
  6. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    What if it were Plaxico instead of Randy Moss?
     
  7. brothermoose

    brothermoose Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7,382
    Likes Received:
    35
    Jacobs is the best of the bunch, although I would get his handcuff 'cause he always gets hurt. Young is disappointing and will only get worse when Torain gets back. Lloyd is Orton's boy, but for how long? Moss is the Oakland Moss. So I still say the first one.
     
  8. rmagedon

    rmagedon Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,896
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's tough. Lloyd is starting to come around with that Bears offense. He had a great game last week. But Plaxico is almost guaranteed points week in-week out. Young is the only thing holding me back from taking that trade, but...because it's Plax, I guess I'd pull the trigger.
     
  9. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    I need WR more, and I want to trade Jacobs while he's still healthy. His schedule (well, Plax's too) will get much harder.
     
  10. rmagedon

    rmagedon Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,896
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, obviously, if you need a WR this week, then this trade won't help you out much in the short run.

    I would pull the trigger on the trade if you can, pick up Ward. I know that's a lot of Giants players to have on your team, but Jacobs has only had 1-100 yd game (Week 1) and 1TD (Week 3). I've seen Ward take almost all the 2nd half snaps. I don't know if the Giants are trying to limit his touches because they know he's injury prone or because they want to keep him fresh for the long run, but I don't see how that helps u (and myself) fantasy wise.

    Don't get upset tho when Jacobs has one of those 50yds, 2TD's tho. But I see Plax having more 100+yd games w/ 1 TD than Jacobs and the above stat.
     
  11. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    I don't care about this week at all. I think my team has enough depth where I can even get Colston if I wanted and be able to take it. Next week, I have a few more byes than this week, but I'm fine starting Roddy and Gonzalez at WR next week if I have to.

    I'm just annoyed that he took the deal off the table and offered me Chester Taylor and Moss for Braylon and Jacobs. How come every time I'm close to a deal in this league, someone decides to ruin it by offering something insulting like that.
     
  12. brothermoose

    brothermoose Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7,382
    Likes Received:
    35
    Young>Lloyd
    Jacobs=Burress over the long haul

    If you need WR more, then I'd say do it...if it is available at all.
     
  13. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    I'd rather have Lloyd than Young. Young won't score at all. I'm starting to like Lloyd.
     
  14. Namath2Kolber

    Namath2Kolber New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,970
    Likes Received:
    1
    I would take Randy/Selvin
     

Share This Page