Around the AFC East -

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by NDmick, May 25, 2009.

  1. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2009/5/22/882999/around-the-afc-east-week-2-new

    I love the New York Jets - or rather, I love to hate them. Why? Because they do weird things. Honestly, the Jets are one of the strangest-run organizations in all of sports; all style, no substance. They're impatient, they make big splashes with tiny ripple effects, and they routinely infuriate their fans on draft day (save this year, of course).

    Two of the Jets' most recent failed experiments - former head coach Eric Mangini and the insufferable Brett Favre - were escorted out of New York this off-season, leading to a lot more flashy change in New York. Will it help? Time will tell, but I'm more interested in hearing whether Jets fans feel all of the big change hinders the overall progress of that organization. That's where John B of Gang Green Nation comes in.

    I want to talk about a couple of failed experiments in New York; namely, the hiring of Eric Mangini as head coach and the trade for QB Brett Favre. Neither is with the team any longer, so don't hold any punches. Did bringing in either of these men hinder the overall progress of the Jets organization?

    John B: I'll start with Mangini. In the long run, I actually think his tenure with the Jets will be a positive. He brought in a lot of talent and left the club in much better shape than he inheirited it. The way in which he hindered the development of the franchise mainly has to do with the 2008 season. The AFC was wide open, and he had as much talent as anybody in the conference. This was a golden opportunity to end four decades of misery. While he was certainly not the only problem and arguably not the biggest, he was a big reason the team collapsed the way it did. He saw in 2007 his coordinators were not getting the job done and retained both of them for 2008. He did not demand they make necessary changes as the season progressed. Blitzing more on defense and finding more than two offensive touches in a given week for Leon Washington are examples. The gameplans were suspect, and in game decision making was suspect down the stretch. 2008 could have been a transformational year for the Jets. Mangini was one of the reasons the team did not go as far as it might have.

    Favre is tougher to evaluate. He shares in blame for the collapse. However, we will not know the extent which he cost the franchise for a few years. His presence cost the team a year in which it could have evaluated Kellen Clemens. Imagine Clemens goes to another team and becomes a quality quarterback. Then imagine Mark Sanchez does not pan out. One season of Favre in this scenario may have cost the team five years to a decade.

    Now if Clemens does not pan out as a player or Sanchez does, Favre's cost to the Jets comes down roughly to what Mangini's was. One could argue it cost the team Chad Pennington, but it seemed like the power that be had determined Chad had taken the Jets as far as he could. At best, he does what he did with Miami in 2008, wins the division, and gets bloodied by the Ravens in the first round. Been there. Done that. Would it really have been that much better of an outcome?

    ***

    I'm thankful that there's another (several) week(s) of Around the AFC East to come, because reading about people potentially screwing over the Jets organization gave me a sudden urge to ask John about GM Mike Tannenbaum. Next Friday!

    In the meantime, John's on point in regards to Favre - he outlines exactly what it was miraculously stupid for the Jets to add him last season. It would have been a dumb move even if they'd made the playoffs. Bringing in Favre set the franchise up to fail, and fail they did. They're not starting over in New York as a result, but there was plenty of change for a club that hasn't been able to get over the hump in the AFC East any better than our Bills have.

    As for Mangini - well, I always thought he was kind of a dunderhead, but I thought that the Jets pulled the plug on him far too quickly. When they hired Mangini, he was the youngest head coach in the league that was made to look more intelligent because of the man he worked for in New England. The raw tools for a good coach are there, but the Jets got impatient after three years. That's terrible management; it's like drafting Kellen Clemens in the second round and then bringing in a washed up future Hall of Famer and a whiz kid out of USC. Wait...
     
  2. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    its from a Buffalo site... A lot of whining about the QB spot and not the pussy defense.

    I can't even tell anyone to enjoy this - because its written from a perspective that is non objective.
     
  3. Firemangini Ed

    Firemangini Ed New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,817
    Likes Received:
    0
    "Favre is tougher to evaluate. He shares in blame for the collapse. However, we will not know the extent which he cost the franchise for a few years. His presence cost the team a year in which it could have evaluated Kellen Clemens. Imagine Clemens goes to another team and becomes a quality quarterback. Then imagine Mark Sanchez does not pan out. One season of Favre in this scenario may have cost the team five years to a decade."

    No crap.
     
  4. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    The Jets don't have the season they had last year without Favre. They're 7-9 at best with Kellen Clemens at QB. There really was not a lot of talent on the Jets last season on the offensive side of the ball. There were some good players, but Favre was the glue that made everything stick together and made everybody so much better in the first two thirds of the season. Then he was the main reason it all fell apart on offense in the last third.

    Going and getting him was not a wise move for the long term but it was the only reason the Jets were in the thick of things after the Titans game. Without that move the Jets are just "building" again last year and with several 30+ players on both sides of the ball in the process.
     
  5. NYCBillsFan

    NYCBillsFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,216
    Likes Received:
    81
    Actually, the poster is a JETS fan. Buffalo Rumblings likes to hear from fans of AFC East rivals to try and diffuse the homers that run rampant on NFL fanbase Message Boards. PATRIOTS fans tend to get annoying sometimes, but JETS and DOLPHINS perspectives are great reads most of the time.
     
  6. Jet Blue

    Jet Blue New Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,528
    Likes Received:
    0
    I heard Mike Westoff, off the cuff just, GUSH about Favre.. Favre was the reason Mike rushed back form surgery and he called signing Favre a no brainer move and he said after last year He'd sign up for another year of Favre in a heartbeat... 99% of the players stated they loved working with Brett yet 2 guys get allthe press while Rhodes statement that he should work in the preseason with the team wasn't too outrageous.

    We have to remember Mangini ruined Favre - When you come out Vs the Raiders in an empty backfield and Don't run the ball against the worst run defense in football for a whole half while your QB gets Blasted, well.... then it's no longer Favre's fault when he's dinged and tries to do too much leter on.... Sorry haters.

    Against teams like Oakland and KC Favre should have been feeding the ball to Leon and Jones ALL DAY... They should have tried to set a record for rushing attempts and then throw the ball when things opened up.... But NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO....


    And that is why Mangini is gone.

    But, Favre didn't cost this team a damn thing.. If anyone think the Jets would have won the SB last year then, that's one thing.. But, as we stand now, with or without Pennington, this team needed to find it's QB and hopefuly Sanchez is it... Chad was NOT.

    But, PLEASE, with the acting as if Favre was some disaster.. It was a 4 win team that at points flashed as if they were among the best in the NFL WITH FAVRE - Then Favre gets unneccessarily dinged and the defense goes in a shell - BYE BYE MANGENIUS.

    NEXT.
     
  7. Big Blocker

    Big Blocker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    13,104
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    About Favre,

    The writer ignores the importance of Favre giving the team the cred and cover they needed to get rid of Chad, which was necesary to move forward. I agree it hampered the team's ability to assess Clemens, though. Whether that in turn led to what might be seen as a desparation move to get Sanchez remains to be seen.

    That being said, nothing as it presently stands prevents either or both Clemens and Sanchez from being quality NFL Qb's. Let's hope so.
     
  8. Jersey Joe 67

    Jersey Joe 67 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2006
    Messages:
    7,202
    Likes Received:
    1,873
    Mangini coached scared all the time and Favre's heart wasn't in it because he never got to play against GB. End of story.
     
  9. Jets n Boys

    Jets n Boys Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    0
    I actually agree with the writer. We didn't need a cover to dump Chad. Just bench him a yr and if KC panned out, ask Chad to be a backup or be traded. If players of Favre's caliber can be traded, Chad is a non-issue with all the health issues (Can we say John Abraham?).

    I liked the move, and I was upbeat about it. But now that I think about it, we should have given some playing time to KC aswell in games where we either had a big lead, Favre was ineffective, or were being blown out (Chargers). I know he played the Chargers game (cuz Favre apparently injured himself), but he should have been inserted earlier.

    We would have been in a different shape had KC thrown about a 100 passes. We would have had a better idea of him and it was probably would have made an impact on our draft if KC played well enough in his limited opportunity. Favre should have been benched when there was nothing left to play for during the Dolphins game. Atleast the second half.

    All this falls on the shoulder of the HC. Its actually a combination of HC decisions and a win now philosofy. Im glad Mangini is gone though. He may turn out to be a good or great coach one day, but I don't think New York can wait a decade.
     
  10. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    The time to look hard at Clemens was in 2007 before garbage time. We didn't do that and so we didn't get the opportunity to discover whether or not he was an NFL QB. In 2008 barring the decision to cut Chad (which is what we should have done in January of 2008) there was no way Clemens was going to get a real look at QB and he didn't.

    The Kellen Clemens saga from draft to the end of last season is basically on Eric Mangini's head. He didn't handle the situation well and so we're still in the dark as to whether or not Clemens can cut it at this level.

    Watch the Browns next season. I bet they have all sorts of issues at QB and Mangini winds up going back and forth between Anderson and Quinn without ever settling on one guy.
     
  11. GBA

    GBA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,690
    Likes Received:
    126
    The organization can do whatever the hell they want to; they don't need to bring in a washed up old has-been to justify benching or trading Pennington. It was a stupid move, long term and short term. We could have known what we had in Clemens and moved on, now we have 2 QB's who haven't proved a thing. And if you looked at Favre's track record, it's clear he had a history of hitting the wall after week 12, so why the FO didn't see that coming a mile away is a mystery. Our collapse was pretty well unavoidable.
     
  12. Freeman McNeil

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    2
    The Jets were forced to move Pennington due to contractual issues (roster bonus), so they had to backfill with a veteran, they decided to go with a veteran starter as opposed to a backup to Clemens, that was a mistake.

    Another mistake was to not draft a QB in Round 1. The Jets have done a crappy job in succession planning at the QB position and that's why we've never had stability in the position. Clemens should have been the starter last year, with a veteran backup and Flacco at third string. If we did that last year Clemens would have had his opportunity, we would have had a veteran for insurance and Flacco waiting in the wings. Based on Flacco's performance last year he's probably be our starter now with Clemens in the backup role.

    Instead we draft a DE convert him to an OLB and never use him. Waste a 2nd rounder on Favre. Blow out our entire draft for Sanchez (in a desperation move) and now Clemens gets his turn. This is what happens when you have a win now mentality instead of thinking for the longer term. I blame Woody Johnson for this. In his world it's about selling PSLs first and putting a consistent winner on the field second.

    This year we have two inexperienced QBs so we'll have to bring in a veteran just in case. We could have had the same scenario last year we just delayed it for a year and wasted a bunch of draft picks in the process, not to mention have a lot of holes to fill (WR, DE, DL/OL Depth)

    Going forward we'll see what happens, but from my perspective the biggest mistake we could make is getting rid of an inexpensive and still young Clemens, even if Sanchez beats him in camp. Also expect the Jets to lose additional draft picks as they scramble to fill holes which they didn't fill in their last draft. Thankfully there's some criminals available to help us shore up some of these areas.
     
    #12 Freeman McNeil, May 27, 2009
    Last edited: May 27, 2009
  13. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,642
    Likes Received:
    24,621
    It's funny that as Bills fan would laugh at any team's coaching or QB situations.
     
  14. Big Blocker

    Big Blocker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    13,104
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    They can do whatever they want, but you ignore that a large portion of the fanbase were Chad Fans last year, and it was not coincidentally the year the Jets were beginning to offer PSL's. I thought it was clear Chad was not the long term answer, but there were no guarantees Clemens would play well. If he did not and the Chad Fans were up in arms to begin with, it would have been a bad business environment to sell PSL's. That doesn't mean I disagree with the rest of your post, but to just say the Jets could ignore the controversy that would have erupted were they to have moved Chad without the cover of bringing in a future HOF'er is not realistic.
     
  15. FOURTHANDLONG

    FOURTHANDLONG Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2006
    Messages:
    3,384
    Likes Received:
    2

    This sums it up in a nutshell. Woody has yet to realize the way to sell PSL's is to win. To do that you have to build a team not make panic moves in hopes of a miracle that is not gonna happen. With all that was done we are still not in the general vicinity of the Steelers, Pats, Colts or Chargers.
     
  16. magoo

    magoo Banned

    Joined:
    May 27, 2009
    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bills fans are the most clueless in the NFL... Poor idiots actually thing TO is going to give the team some fire!!! LMAO
     
  17. NYCBillsFan

    NYCBillsFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,216
    Likes Received:
    81
    Either the BILLS make the playoffs, or T.O. divides yet another team and the BILLS go into rebuilding mode. I realize that. It's about time for my team.

    But when you look back at this time last year, there was a HUGE amount of Farve love going on around here, so I'd be cautious about the use of the word clueless in the wake of your QB situation.
     
    #17 NYCBillsFan, May 28, 2009
    Last edited: May 28, 2009
  18. NYCBillsFan

    NYCBillsFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,216
    Likes Received:
    81
    With that low of an opinion of the BILLS, it must show you that if BILLS fans are laughing, your situation must be pretty dire.......
     
  19. fr0zensm0ke

    fr0zensm0ke Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2009
    Messages:
    262
    Likes Received:
    0

    Then what do you call the last ten years, mediocre mode?

    A lot of people never did get very high on Favre though, I sure didn't jump on that bandwagon. I would have preferred Kellen to start and see what he was really capable of before this years draft. We essentially lost a year with Brett Favre, and ended up drafting a QB anyways. I like the Sanchez pick, but it would have been nice to know that Kellen ISN'T "the guy" before hand. Now a few years down the road, he could be another Drew Brees (playing top flight football, on another team). I can't say I'm terribly unhappy though, I like Rex Ryan's philosophy a lot more than Mangini's.
     
  20. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,642
    Likes Received:
    24,621
    I felt the same retarded comfort when Herman Edwards was fooling the league as Jets HC. Jauron is a fraud. Edwards hasn't proven much except he's fragile. 'Competing' can be a word used in many contexts, unfortunately it doesn't usually get associated with championships. A fraud of a coach and a guy like TO... that's more than I could ask of a division rival.
     

Share This Page