Arbitrator rules Saints' Graham is a tight end

Discussion in 'National Football League' started by jixxjr, Jul 2, 2014.

  1. jixxjr

    jixxjr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2002
    Messages:
    1,532
    Likes Received:
    223
    http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/sports-general/20140702/Saints-Graham/print/

    Arbitrator rules Saints' Graham is a tight end

    By BRETT MARTEL, AP
    Wed Jul 2, 8:03 PM UTC

    The Saints' Jimmy Graham and the NFL Players Association were dealt a setback Wednesday when an arbitrator ruled that he can only be considered a tight end for the purposes of his franchise tag designation.
    NFLPA had filed a grievance arguing that Graham was used as a wide receiver often enough to qualify for the more lucrative receiver tag. But arbitrator Stephen Burbank disagreed and now the NFLPA is reviewing his ruling, and will advise Graham on his options, which could include an appeal.
    Graham's case is being closely watched around the league because it could set a precedent for negotiations involving players who fill diverse roles in their teams' offensive or defensive schemes. For example, some outside linebackers in a 3-4 defensive scheme could argue their right to receive the higher defensive end tag.
    NFL franchise tags, which allow each team to keep one prized player who is due to become a free agent, were set this year at $7 million for tight ends and $12.3 million for receivers.
    Burbank, who is also a University of Pennsylvania law professor, found that Graham could fulfill the standard duties of a tight end when he was lined up in the slot or within 4 yards of an offensive tackle, as he was for most of his snaps.
    Burbank further pointed out that defenses usually accounted for Graham as a tight end, regardless of his alignment, by assigning a linebacker or safety to cover him.
    ''Like tight ends, wide receivers and running backs often line up in the slot,'' Burbank's ruling stated. ''The defense employed against any player so aligned turns on the player's position, not his alignment, because of the physical attributes and skill sets of the players in those positions.''
    Burbank indicated there could be merit to the NFLPA contention that Graham cannot be considered a tight end when he does in fact line up as a wideout. However, because both sides stipulated that Graham lined up within 4 yards of an offensive tackle for nearly 55 percent of his snaps, Burbank said he did not need to address the minority of instances in which offensive formations employed by Saints coach Sean Payton placed Graham at a wider distance from the offensive line.
    The NFL's collective bargaining agreement states that franchise tags should be applied according to the position at which a player lines up for the majority of his snaps.
    Graham has skipped Saints offseason practices while holding out for a new, long-term contract. A favorable ruling from Burbank would have further enhanced negotiating leverage for Graham, who last season led the Saints with 86 catches for 1,215 yards and 16 touchdowns.
    Saints spokesman Greg Bensel said the club would have no comment on the ruling, and Sexton did not respond to a request for comment.
    In its statement, the NFLPA said: ''We will also continue to assist Graham and his representation as necessary to help the player reach a fair long-term deal with the New Orleans Saints.''
    Such disputes are not frequent, but draw lots of attention because of their potential to set a precedent.
    Baltimore's Terrell Suggs, the 2011 Defensive Player of the Year, argued in 2008 that he should be tagged as an end, not a linebacker. The difference back then was about $800,000. That dispute ended when Suggs signed a new long-term contract with the Ravens. He later helped them win the 2012 NFL championship.
    July 15 is the final day a team can sign 2014 franchise players to long-term extensions. Otherwise, they must play under their franchise tag designation for one season, after which they would be set to become free agents.
    ---
    AP NFL website: www.pro32.ap.org and www.twitter.com/AP-NFL
    The Associated Press
     
  2. NotSatoshiNakamoto

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    16,349
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    I hope Amaro doesn't turn into another Jimmy Graham!
     
  3. TNJet

    TNJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    6,312
    Likes Received:
    1,636
    Graham should just play his one year and become a free agent WR.
     
    Chad9 likes this.
  4. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    It was the right ruling by the arbitrator. Graham is a TE. He's a versatile game-breaking TE but a TE nonetheless.
     
  5. Greenday4537

    Greenday4537 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,734
    Likes Received:
    3,184
    I heard it didn't help that Graham calls himself a TE and not a WR in public repeatedly. Look at his Twitter. TE not WR.
     
  6. Barcs

    Barcs Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,776
    Likes Received:
    267
    Good. This is can of worms that should not be opened at this time. If they want to review it for the future and update the rule based on reception #s that's fine with me, but you can't just expect them to change it on a whim cuz Graham says so, especially since there are other TEs that catch for a much greater percentage of snaps. I know he wants more money and feels he should be making more, so I can see where he's coming from. There's a good chance he's an expensive FA next season since they saints chose to franchise him, it's like a slap in the face.
     
  7. Chad9

    Chad9 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2014
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    7
    Yeah, that would be horrible.
    Why wouldn't you want comparable numbers to Graham from your TE knowing you'll now never have to pay him like a WR? You should be rejoicing. And the decision was the right one IMO. He was drafted as a TE and he IS a TE. I understand his point but you're mucking up the waters when you allow what he wants. If he thinks he can get WR money, then he can become a free agent.
     
  8. NotSatoshiNakamoto

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    16,349
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    Thanks new guy.
    http://forums.theganggreen.com/threads/2014-minicamp-thread.81121/page-9#post-3015261
     
  9. Chad9

    Chad9 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2014
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    7
  10. Jets Esq.

    Jets Esq. Guest

    That wouldn't have worked. The Saints would franchise tag him, for like $7.5m, then franchise him again for a bit under $10m, and then they could franchise him again for about $12m if he was still at the top of his game.

    Therefore, he just settled on the $10m/year average and got guarantees and bonus money, and also became the highest paid TE. The franchise tag is a very big deal.
     
  11. JStokes

    JStokes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,735
    Likes Received:
    9,196
    As much as it sounds like the thing to do, these guys are not going to give up some pretty good guaranteed money with the possibility of suffering a career threatening injury.

    _
     

Share This Page