Andrew Luck may not throw at combine

Discussion in 'Draft' started by Murrell2878, Feb 22, 2012.

  1. Murrell2878

    Murrell2878 Lets go JETS!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    24,461
    Likes Received:
    865
  2. NotSatoshiNakamoto

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    16,349
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    Why should he? He doesn't need to improve his draft position, he's a lock for #1 overall.
     
  3. nyjetsrule

    nyjetsrule Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Messages:
    10,379
    Likes Received:
    7
    Colts advised him not to throw? I don't think I have ever heard of that before... agents sure, but a team? That just seems weird...
     
  4. ace_o_spades

    ace_o_spades New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    Smoke screen!
     
  5. steves850

    steves850 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,037
    Likes Received:
    0
    I really don't understand the logic on having Luck not throw? Can someone show me some insight?
     
  6. mute

    mute Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Messages:
    9,113
    Likes Received:
    3,142
    It does.

    Sent from my VM670 using Tapatalk
     
  7. NotSatoshiNakamoto

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    16,349
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    I can think of a couple of reasons. First, his value is never going to be any higher than it is right now. If he goes out to the combine and doesn't blow people away it could give people some things to pick on and try and knock the price down on a potential trade. The other reason would be to avoid any potential injury (as unlikely as that may be).
     
  8. steves850

    steves850 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,037
    Likes Received:
    0
    I see. That makes sense in a conventional way but I don't see any circumstance where the Colts would trade the pick or Luck away.. And if the Colts are afraid of injury then Luck is a liability and his injury would save them from picking him first and dealing with injuries for the future..
     
  9. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    The Colts would trade Luck if their internal assessment of him was that he was not a lock to be a great QB but everybody else was treating him as though he was. In that situation they keep Peyton, make a deal for Luck and draft Peyton's replacement partly with the proceeds of the deal.

    Let's say that the Colts thought RGIII was a better prospect. In that situation they trade the Luck pick down a couple of slots for a King's ransom and then they hope RGIII is there on the 3 or 4 for them. Alternately they might look at taking Barkley next year using the proceeds of the Luck deal.
     
  10. steves850

    steves850 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,037
    Likes Received:
    0
    Fair point but that would be some blockbuster shit. It seems most people follow the general consensus and I have seen little to no naysayers on Luck. The most I've seen is RGIII is as good or close to as good as Luck.
     
  11. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    Imagine getting RGIII and a 2nd this year and a 1st and a 2nd next year out of Minnesota or Cleveland for Luck.

    You make the deal the same way that the Chargers and Giants did, with the Colts taking Luck on the #1 and then waiting to see who landed RGIII on the 3 or 4.

    That would be like instant rebuild in Indy and they still have Peyton to keep the fans happy this year.
     
  12. Cellar-door

    Cellar-door Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2004
    Messages:
    2,357
    Likes Received:
    11
    When was the last time a consensus top 5 pick QB did throw at the combine? The top QBs always skip the combine.
     
  13. Green Hurricane

    Green Hurricane Footsteps Falco

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2003
    Messages:
    7,728
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good, he shouldn't throw. As for why, I lean towards the why give anyone reason to criticize him idea.
     
  14. KerleyFries

    KerleyFries Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2012
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    7
    If he's not going to throw at the combine, does that mean he also won't throw on his Stanford Pro day?
     
  15. Green Hurricane

    Green Hurricane Footsteps Falco

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2003
    Messages:
    7,728
    Likes Received:
    0
    He'll throw then most likely. It'll be his own regiment of throws with his own WRs on his field, so it'll be ideal conditions.
     

Share This Page