2009 Comp Picks announced

Discussion in 'Draft' started by WW85, Mar 23, 2009.

  1. WW85

    WW85 MOCKERATOR
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    13,482
    Likes Received:
    959
    2009 Compensatory Draft Picks
    Posted by Mike Florio on March 23, 2009, 7:59 p.m. EDT
    The 2009 compensatory picks are set forth below, with round, overall place in round, overall place in draft, and team.

    3 (33-97) New England

    3 (34-98) Cincinnati

    3 (35-99) Chicago

    3 (36-100) NY Giants

    4 (33-133) San Diego

    4 (34-134) San Diego

    4 (35-135) Tennessee

    4 (36-136) Indianapolis

    5 (33-169) Pittsburgh

    5 (34-170) New England

    5 (35-171) San Francisco

    5 (36-172) Dallas

    5 (37-173) Tennessee

    6 (33-206) Tennessee

    6 (34-207) New England

    6 (35-2080 Dallas

    6 (36-209) Cincinnati

    7 (33-242) Tennessee

    7 (34-243) Washington

    7 (35-244) San Francisco

    7 (36-245) Seattle

    7 (37-246) Chicago

    7 (38-247) Seattle

    7 (39-248) Seattle

    7 (40-249) Cincinnati

    7 (41-250) Jacksonville

    7 (42-251) Chicago

    7 (43-252) Cincinnati

    7 (44-253) Jacksonville

    7 (45-254) Arizona

    7 (46-255) Detroit

    7 (47-256) Kansas City
     
  2. SyracuseJet

    SyracuseJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    2,307
    Likes Received:
    27
    Just what NE needed, another early round pick.
     
  3. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    I'm a bit surprised Pittsburgh didn't get a 3rd or 4th round pick.

    Edit- The performance turned in by Mewelde Moore is probably the reason the loss of Alan Faneca did not net a 3rd or 4th round comp pick.
     
    #3 Cakes, Mar 23, 2009
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2009
  4. Quack

    Quack New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,753
    Likes Received:
    0
    Who did they lose in free agency to warrant this? They traded players, but I thought that didn't count. They signed a few players, too, so why the hell do they get a 3rd, 5th and a 6th?
     
  5. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    The 3rd is probably for the loss of Samuel, the 5th for Stallworth, and the 6th for Gay.
     
  6. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Patriots probably have a relative of every NFL worker in their training facility as hostage.
     
  7. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    I don't think you'll write a similar thing a year from now.
     
  8. mj2sexay

    mj2sexay Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,619
    Likes Received:
    8
    The Pats compensation picks are a fucking joke. Aside for a 3rd from Samuel give me a fucking break in terms of what they lost compared to what they gained.
     
  9. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    You know these picks are based on the 2008 offseason as opposed to the 2009 offseason, correct?

    they lost- Randall Gay, Eugene Wilson, Asante Samuel, Donte Stallworth

    they gained- Sam Aiken, Fernando Bryant, Victor Hobson, Dan Connolly, C.J. Jones, Scott Player, Lewis Sanders, Marcus Pollard, Jason Webster, Tank Williams

    They signed nobody of impact and I don't recall any of their signings receiving notable contracts. However, they lost several players who signed big contracts elsewhere.

    I don't think there is any "fucking joke" here or that there is a conspiracy as you seem to be implying.

    Next year I don't expect the Patriots to receive three compensatory picks. Jabar Gaffney might have a decent season in Denver. The Patriots did sign a number of players this offseason who probably will perform better than the turds they signed via free agency last year.
     
  10. WW85

    WW85 MOCKERATOR
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    13,482
    Likes Received:
    959
  11. mj2sexay

    mj2sexay Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,619
    Likes Received:
    8
    Cakes...I like you. But your talking out of your ass. Aside from Samuel what did Gay, Stallworth or Wilson do? Wilson was cut by the team that signed him over the summer. Gay played for a shitty Saints secondary. Stallworth was injured and did not have a productive year for the Browns. Besides, they declined Stallworths option so it's not like they actively tried to resign him.
     
  12. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    I could be mistaken, but I think Stallworth signed a pretty hefty contract with the Browns. The fact he got injured and was not productive is why the Pats likely got their 5th or 6th round comp pick from his signing as opposed to a 3rd or 4th.
    These compensatory picks are awarded based upon games played, possibly games started, possibly percentage of snaps played, performance to some extent, salary, and possibly some other factors.

    The NFL has not divulged how exactly they award compensatory selections, so we are only trying to make educated guesses here.
     
  13. WW85

    WW85 MOCKERATOR
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    13,482
    Likes Received:
    959

    Cakes....found the real reason...Faneca only net the Steelers a 5th rd comp pick.




    Steelers | Reason for low compensatory pick revealed
    Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:07:35 -0700

    Scott Brown, of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, reports the reason the Pittsburgh Steelers received only a fifth-round compensatory pick for the loss of OG Alan Faneca to the New York Jets is a team that loses a free agent with 10 or more seasons in the NFL can get no better than a fifth-round compensatory pick.
     

Share This Page