10/15/06 -Refs Help Jets

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by mrjet80, Dec 19, 2006.

  1. mrjet80

    mrjet80 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Messages:
    5,472
    Likes Received:
    4,469
    The refs overall have screwed the Jets on numerous occasions in 2006 but after the Vikings game when I was looking at the playoff scenerios, a particular play from the Bengals-Bucs game on 10/15/06 came back to me. TB was driving with about two minutes left when Justin Smith caused a sack and recovered a fumble sealing an apparent 13-7 win. But Smith was called for a bogus roughing the passer penalty erasing the fumble and allowing TB to continue their drive which resulted in the game-winning TD with :35 to play. It was not even close to roughing the passer, the same type play that the Jets were called on the week before in Jax erasing a safety on Leftwich.At that time it was no big deal to us Jets fans because Cincinnati was terrible anyway. But look at the difference it's made now -the Bengals should be 9-5. I guess there's one screw up which will help us this year.....:up:
     
    #1 mrjet80, Dec 19, 2006
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2006
  2. wildthing202

    wildthing202 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2003
    Messages:
    14,495
    Likes Received:
    4
    .....and we'd be 10-4 if we didn't get screwed and your point is?
     
  3. JJBagoose

    JJBagoose Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    395
    Likes Received:
    162
    How would we be 10-4? lol
     
  4. mrjet80

    mrjet80 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Messages:
    5,472
    Likes Received:
    4,469
    I know we got screwed against Cleveland but who else? That TB game more than makes up for it - we own the tie-breaker on the Benglas if we win out -right now that game on 10/15 is looking like a bigger screw-up as long as the Jets win their final two......in other words it may very well by itself keep the Bengals out of the playoffs. Understand now??
     
  5. rillo

    rillo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,531
    Likes Received:
    0
    I hope we dont get screwed wit the refs on christmas....cuz they have screwed us b4 down here....:finssuck:
     
    #5 rillo, Dec 19, 2006
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2006
  6. wildthing202

    wildthing202 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2003
    Messages:
    14,495
    Likes Received:
    4
    Baker non-TD vs Cle and Miller PI vs. Indy. We could of won both of those.
     
  7. mrjet80

    mrjet80 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Messages:
    5,472
    Likes Received:
    4,469
    The Jets would of tied the Cleveland game -who knows what would of happened in OT. That Bengals-Bucs game was over in the Bengals favor until the refs threw the flag on one of the most ridiculous calls of the year...but that's OK
     
  8. nyjunc

    nyjunc 2008 TGG Bryan Cox "Most Argumentative" Award Winn

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    53,044
    Likes Received:
    1,434
    They also screwed up the muffed punt earlier in the game, if we get that then maybe the Baker TD gives us the win not the tie.
     
  9. Twombles

    Twombles Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2005
    Messages:
    4,652
    Likes Received:
    0
    If the refs knew that it would help the jets im sure they would have not called it lol
     
  10. jonnyd

    jonnyd 2007 TGG.com Funniest Poster Award Winner

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    Messages:
    13,035
    Likes Received:
    2,584
    possibly. But you just cant say we'd be 10-4......we still could HAVE(not of)lost the cleveland game...and we definitely still lose the Indy game...If Peyton needed three TD's in the last 2 mins to win, he would have gotten it...They were moving the ball at will, would not HAVE(not of) mattered
     
  11. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    Pass interference was the correct call.
     
  12. EcKo151

    EcKo151 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,374
    Likes Received:
    9
    It was very borderline, ticky-tacky call. That's really pushing a thin line, but oh well.
     
  13. nyjunc

    nyjunc 2008 TGG Bryan Cox "Most Argumentative" Award Winn

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    53,044
    Likes Received:
    1,434
    Even if they don't call PI on Miller Manning is leading the to a TD, our D couldn't do anything to stop them that 2nd half. That was my biggest concern after Miller's KR TD- we left them too much time.
     
  14. ollie

    ollie Right Wing NutJob

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2003
    Messages:
    8,310
    Likes Received:
    30
    The other thing everyone forgets about the Indy game was going for it on 4th down (which I supported and still do) instead of kicking the field goal... I think that was the bigger factor in that game than the P.I. call, which I thought was bullshit, but I gotta be fair
     
  15. nyjunc

    nyjunc 2008 TGG Bryan Cox "Most Argumentative" Award Winn

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    53,044
    Likes Received:
    1,434
    No question, that was an idiotic call. 4th and 1 ok but 4th and G from the 3 in a tie game? just dumb.
     
  16. ollie

    ollie Right Wing NutJob

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2003
    Messages:
    8,310
    Likes Received:
    30
    I wouldn't go as far as to call it idiotic... after driving the field for 16 plays I can see why he went for it... however, he should have taken the 3...
     
  17. nyjunc

    nyjunc 2008 TGG Bryan Cox "Most Argumentative" Award Winn

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    53,044
    Likes Received:
    1,434
    it's idiotic from the 3 in that situation. Needing 3 yards there is like going for it on 4th and 20 from 40. Everything tightens up down there, there's not mcuh room and to add to it we ran a pass play rolling to the short side of the field to make it even more difficult.
     
  18. ollie

    ollie Right Wing NutJob

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2003
    Messages:
    8,310
    Likes Received:
    30
    I hear what your saying but at the time Nugent was missing everything and couldn't be trusted and Chad hadn't thrown a redzone pick in his career (he still is one of the best red zone qb's for all you haters) ... so bad call yeah... idiotic seems a bit harsh, but eh... it's over
     
  19. nyjunc

    nyjunc 2008 TGG Bryan Cox "Most Argumentative" Award Winn

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    53,044
    Likes Received:
    1,434
    I don't care if Nugent missed 40 in a row, it would have been a 21 yard attempt and he would make it. They didn't not kick b/c of shaken confidence in Nugent, Nugent had been kicking very well since the debacle in Tennessee anyway.
     
  20. ollie

    ollie Right Wing NutJob

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2003
    Messages:
    8,310
    Likes Received:
    30
    I disagree, but the game's long over and silly to argue at this point....
     

Share This Page