Separate names with a comma.
Lol someone has
You're a clown. You're not worth the time or effort. Buttt...... since I'm bored. Let's go back to your original sentiment. Move up from 42...
Dude. Stop
Exactly. After round 2 you don't even consider needs fir the pick. Just pick the best player you think is available
My only question is why anyone would entertain this troll of a question? Trade from 42 to 14 for a TE? WTF are we even taking about.
I feel like this would be a good spot to move up. The Jets have 2 fifth round and 2 sixth round picks. If the WR they want is there at say #37 -...
The better question is: What playmaker would you have selected with the pick? Warren? McMillan? I could've lived with Warren. But i think...
Just an ignorant post from some one who did zero research on this draft class
He's not eligible for the 5th year option.
Diggs??? Lol cmon. Dude is not only washed but always been a cancer in the locker room
I will bet anyone on here that Dart goes in the first round.
Exactly. Mac spent like a drunken sailor on a RB (Bell) and MLB (Mosley) in the same off season if I remember correctly. I liked Mosley though....
Not ideal but I doubt Fields was taking anything less than a 2-year deal. Who knows what Pitt was offering.
Who the hell is Fields going to be throwing to? G. Wilson and a bunch of stiffs? The FA WR class is absolute trash. Not one single viable...
I honestly have no idea why anyone uses this simulation. It is completely beyond unrealistic. Grahm at #16? Hunter at #15? Dart at #93?!?!
I like this signing. He is 26 years old. He played really well last year to start the season. He is mobile. He is reuniting with G. Wilson....
I love this time of year
I agree with you. But Daniels was the reason they succeeded. Dan Quinn? He was a .500 coach in ATL with a HOF QB. Kingsbury? Great offensive...
Sure. Having a competent coaching staff is also key to success. However, what I'm saying is that you can have Quinn (.500 coach with Matt Ryan)...
The Redskins hit on Daniels. Nothing else is relevant.
