NFLDC Updated Mock has us taking 3 OL first three out of first four picks

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by PinPointPenning10, Mar 27, 2006.

  1. PinPointPenning10

    PinPointPenning10 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    156
    First round D'Brick and Carpenter, 2nd Mangold 3rd O'Callaghan. Scott Wright is one of the best draft forecasters out there, and if this happened it would be terrible. I would be very happy with Mangold in round 2 and O'Callaghan in round 3, but that's all the OL we need because that fill the need at center and RT. I don't like the D'Brick pick, especially with us getting O'Callaghan later on, and O'Callaghans a RT while D'Bricks a LT. We already have a solid LT in Jones, so I don't want D'Brick unless we're not going to take a tackle later on. Jones seemed really uncomfortable on the right side last year, so I think we should keep him on the left. Carpenter would be an OK pick but I think we can get him round 2 and if not there are other good LBs we can get in round 2 like Lawson and Ryans, who I prefer over Carpenter. I'd also be very mad if we passed on Maroney.

    http://www.nfldraftcountdown.com/sub/mockdraft.html

    Edit: screwed up the title, but I can't edit it.
     
  2. PinPointPenning10

    PinPointPenning10 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    156
    I know there's a thread on this, I just wanted to get some opinions on what they would think if the draft went like this because Wright's one of the best our there.
     
  3. AMJets

    AMJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    22,507
    Likes Received:
    77
    Replace Ferguson with a skill player, and I would LOVE that draft.
     
  4. ny2dave

    ny2dave New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,638
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hawk

    I could deal with AJ Hawk at #4 if we got Mangold and O'Callaghan, but getting D'Brick too wouldn't bother me.
     
  5. MobiusOne28

    MobiusOne28 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,979
    Likes Received:
    0
    I like this draft, but mainly because of the last 3 picks. I would most likely pick Super Mario over D'Brick, or Hawk at 4 and then Maroney at 29. I wouldn't mind this draft though.
     
  6. mrjet80

    mrjet80 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    Messages:
    5,583
    Likes Received:
    4,588
    Taking D'Brick over a defensive stud (Williams or Hawk) wouldn't thrill me but if this prediction were to come through and these players are as good as forecast the Jets would be set at OL for years to come.....

    Carpenter in round two would be a great addition.....
     
  7. ThunderbirdJet

    ThunderbirdJet New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    6,697
    Likes Received:
    0
    I still think we're taking Leinart or Cutler at 4. After that, I agree.... O line.
     
  8. mudman

    mudman New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    255
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am a little confused by the mock. We have the 4th overall pick in the draft.

    Why are we picking 3rd overall in the 2nd round (#35)?
    Why are we picking 7th overall in the 3rd round (#71)?
     
  9. mudman

    mudman New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    255
    Likes Received:
    0
    A little help?
     
  10. RobA

    RobA 2005-2007 TGG.com Most Optimistic Award Winner

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Messages:
    8,746
    Likes Received:
    299
    Bleh, awful. Ferguson is a waste of a pick. Jones is our LT and is doing a fine job. Don't replace a position when you don't need too.
     
  11. jets4life2880

    jets4life2880 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    43
    Likes Received:
    0
    i agree that super mario is the way to go with the 4th pick, then 29th should be maroney who has tremendous upside and talent... then o line will need to be seriously adressed later in the draft.. o callaghan and mangold? agreed?
     
  12. PennyandtheJets

    PennyandtheJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    12,435
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    How about this my man?

    4th overall- Jay Cutler
    29th overall- Bobby Carpenter
    35- Best available Olineman
    3rd rounder- best available offensive player...whether its a WR, RB, or TE...
     
  13. PinPointPenning10

    PinPointPenning10 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    156
    I agree, D'Brick would be a waste of a pick.
     
  14. vilmaisabeast

    vilmaisabeast New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Messages:
    124
    Likes Received:
    0
    If we got cutler at 4, picked mangold at 29 and lawson at 35 i would like this draft
     
  15. AMJets

    AMJets Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Messages:
    22,507
    Likes Received:
    77
    It rotates each round.
     
  16. J-E-T-S Fan 2006

    J-E-T-S Fan 2006 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Draft

    Because Tennessee, the Jets, Green Bay, San Fran and Oakland all had the same record, it goes to a tiebreaker based on opponent's records. That's why we have the #4 pick. It then rotates each round, so in round 2, Tenn. moves to last of that group, the Jets move up, etc. Then in round 3, Green Bay moves up, and the Jets go to last in that group.
     
  17. 3lixer.

    3lixer. Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Messages:
    844
    Likes Received:
    183
    If D'brick can become an Orlando Pace or Johnathan Ogden type tackle then I have no problem picking him. But I don't see him being that dominant. He's good but I don't think worth that high of a pick. There are alot of good OLineman we can pick up in later rounds.
     
  18. nyjets2823

    nyjets2823 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    524
    Likes Received:
    1
    dam man do you think theres any chance that lendale or deangel would fall to the #29.. i dont see arizona taking a rb anymore and i really dont see the pats taking a rb even though ppl say they are because they have dillon and faulk i think..... i cant see the panthers as well wasting their #1 pick on a rb maby a 2nd or 3rd but well see i would love to land one of those 2 guys with the 29 but i think im reaching a little bit...
     
  19. icecreamtruck

    icecreamtruck Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    174
    Likes Received:
    7
    what mobius said is correct. that's the ideal draft. Mario or Hawk with the 4, then OL. OL needs to be a big priority in this draft. A good OL makes CP (or ramsey or, heaven forbid, bolly) better, and makes CMart and Houston better.
     
  20. hydro51

    hydro51 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,603
    Likes Received:
    0
    3 olineman huh.... we only need 2.. why would we get 3 olineman no way we start 3 rookies on our oline
     

Share This Page