yeah I really don't think we were the first to do it. that's not to say that us using it against the colts was what caused them to put in a version of their own.
See, that's the thing. If you guys would go back and look at the way we did it and then see how they did it you'd see it isn't a version but it was done EXACTLY how we did. For those who think an onside is just an onside have no clue what I'm talking about. You have to understand that it was implemented a certain/unique way.
I'll pass on re-reading your post. 3/4 of it was whining about the Colts "stealing" one of our plays.. It's a copy-cat league. Get over it.
How would you know when you didn't read it in the 1st place? Nice comeback btw . Good way to show how thorough you are when you get called out for not being able to read and comprehend something. If you don't like the topic, don't reply.
This thread confuses me. RT believes that the Colts copied us, some posters don't believe it and/or think it doesn't matter or serve a purpose, and RT tells them to check the tape or to look again. Are we going anywhere with this, or just going in circles? I figured that's where it was going in the first place.
they could have copied us, i mean westhoff is one of the best special team coaches this league has to offer.
The Colts are just another team in a long line of "Jet Wanna Be's". They can steal our plays, but they can't change history: Jets 16, Colts 7 Jets 41, Colts 0
