I think you can get Levis for a lot less than that. I’m not a fan personally though. Levis is so stiff and made some awful decisions with the football when he got his chance.
In this entre conversation you had mostly with yourself you never said anything concrete that might work. I initially thought you meant drafting a QB high every year, maybe even trading up for the guy you like, etc... An example would be drafting Simpson this year AND then spend a top 5 pick (or package multiple assets to move up) next year, and if out of the two one doesn't clearly emerge, another 1st round pick the year after, until you are confident you have a young FQB. That to me was not practical, but at least it was an idea worth discussing. Instead were you arrived after this internal debate is getting "viable" QBs every year. When asked to clarify, you said to look in the dictionary, which says "capable of working successfully; feasible". Which is exactly what we have been doing: the coaches are getting what they think are capable QBs, with Rodgers, Fields, Tyrod, and Geno being latest examples. You have provided no nuance, no refinement when asked again and again, just a stock dictionary answer. Basically, your novel idea is: get capable QBs - with no clarification whatsoever. Why couldn't anyone else think of this genus plan? All we have to do is get viable QBs, and we are set! How to find viable QBs, what look for, well dictionary of course that's where the answer is. Come on, RB, yes, I am making fun of this, but that's actually what you are saying.
Your big problem is that you do not comprehend what you read which leads you to come up with your own idea of what someone is saying instead of understanding what is on the page and your ego tells you that is okay. Your other problem is that you cannot understand that anyone would not care in the slightest about your opinion regardless of how you arrived at it.
Can we start a thread about our opinions on available QBs? This one clearly turned into something else.
You don't have any concrete idea and your so called clarification (stock definition of word viable in the dictionary without any nuance) proved that. Also for someone who does not care the slightest you sure spent a lot of time responding.
