When I jumped into the convo was on your post on rotoToto wire. I pointed out that Patrick Mahomes has a very similar stat ZW, implying that particular stat was not a good one to base any judgment off. Nothing more nothing less I hope you’re all caught up.
Do you have any thoughts on "What stats does Zach need in 2022 to call his season a success"? Do you have a thought process at all?
If you’re asking if I have an opinion on what stats ZW needs to call his season a success, no - I don’t. I’d say the season is a fail* if he throws more ints than tds but I hold no standards for a success. Even if he has a failed 2nd season by my metrics, I wouldn’t call for his replacement next year. If you’re trying to change the subject from the post where I reminded you of your words… typical.
If you have no thoughts on the subject here you should not be posting here. In doing so you have proven you are simply here to be a disruption.
Suppose he plays like dog shit but somehow wins 9 games or so. Does he get the Baker Mayfield treatment in 2023?
I humbly disagree. Having no opinion is better than having a bad and heavily flawed opinion. I will not apologize for calling you out.
I ask for no apologies; I stand by what I post and endeavor to remain on topic. I retract anything I post that turns out to be in error. I apologize to all if I am drawn off-topic by those who are not looking for honest discussion, have no opinion, but attack nonetheless. Anyone believing my opinion is bad or flawed in any way is more than welcome to address that with which they disagree. Anyone who simply desires to be a pain in the ass and interfere with legitimate on-topic dialogue can stuff it.
While your apology sounds sincere and appreciated I need to remind you of the “attack” that started this all. That’s it. Every attack after that is just quoting you back to yourself. Let’s reminisce about when you stated an analyst wouldn’t be able to tell the difference between an uncatchable ball and a dropped ball. Hint: if the ball touched the received hands, it was catchable. Ahh good times.
Are you of the mind that you are the only poster who can make attacks and something you wrote initiated the disagreement? You are not and did not, you give yourself way too much credit but that did not stop you from jumping in with your assumptions and reading comprehension problems in the middle of my dialogue with Bickety. "Let's reminisce" about your writing that I "stated an analyst wouldn’t be able to tell the difference between an uncatchable ball and a dropped ball." I never said anything of the sort! What I did say, you quoted precisely in the second part of your post above which points to the problem of subjective ratings that will vary according to who is rating the plays. Do you really not understand that? Do you really believe your position is augmented by posting lies? And thanks for reminding everyone that the bad pass number from Rotowire was about average for the league, which I mentioned when I first introduced it. Which leads us back, one more time, to the crux of the discussion here that Bickety objected to so strenuously before you fell out of the ether, my opinion that Wilson threw an average of about three passes each game that were either "dirtballs" or "sky balls" and those needed to be reduced drastically in order to get his performance and hence his statistics, (because that's what the OP asked for) to a level that may indicate success. I would add that the figures from Rotowire would translate to roughly twice as many bad passes as I noted. If you want to discuss the topic here, you could start by giving your opinion of how many bad passes Wilson threw per game and by answering the question posed in the title of the thread.
Judging a good NFL QB is like trying to define pornography. "I can't define it, but I know it when I see it." ---- Justice Potter Stewart
