can't blame chad at all, our wrs are to blame for that. we could'nt get our running game going. we lost at a team level on this, including special teams. i believe chad is playing well with what he has to work with.
I don't want KC to embarrass himself and we're paying the slouch $9,000,000 as it is, and we aren't getting much better with Ramsey, might as well make Pennington take his hits for the money he is robbing us of.
I'm going to say yes not because I feel chad is a great QB, but I feel it would be wrong to pull him in the middle of a playoff run. Plus, clemens is a rookie, and will make rookie mistakes. And Ramsey, well, sucks, he's already proven that. I'd like to see what clemens can do, but it would make no sense right now at all. It would be like throwing the season away.
one bad game and a guy should be benched, i didnt see this after the pats game, or the first pats game or the lions game, or colts game, but when he has an off day, thats one reason i dislike football, one bad day and the guy is a bum, one good game and that all turns around..... with all do respect people.. SHUT THE FUCK UP!!
Thats pretty much how i feel about it. If and when we are eliminated,and Chad is still playing like crap,then start Clemens. Ramsey is a proven loser,I would have rather had Brooks than him.
Uhh-ohhh! The RobA kiss of death. Chad's comeback began with RobA dissing him, now he is destined to be another photo in RobA's sig. :rofl:
Eh hem, I am not a fan of chad, and have been questioning him for a long time. I've never liked him that much. And by no means do I think he is the future of this franchise, I just believe in the middle of a playoff race, putting in the rookie makes no sense. The jets can win, but with chad, every game will be a struggle. They have to adjust the gameplan to only what he can do, limiting the entire offense. Clemens is the future, no doubt, but not this season.
On the other hand, we should be at LEAST 6-4 right now. No excuses for Chad sucking in the Cleveland game.
they're not the 1985 bears, or the 2000 ravens. the cards ran up 23 points on them and miami beat them. unless you want to concede that harrington is actually a better qb than mr. manage -the-game.hmy:
Let's discuss the 1985 Bears: The 2-14 Bucs scored 28 and 19 points on them Not taking anything away from the 85 Bears...just saying your logic is flawed...:wink: As for the 200 Ravens: Jax put up 36 on them...and went 7-9 They lost to they 8-8 Skins and 9-7 Steelers
Voted No. But, I think we should trade him. If we don't trade then I'd still consider him for the starting position.
Is this a joke? The running game racked up yards in the first half, and then the Bears just decided, you know what, let's just play the run and the short pass, and leave everything over 10 yards open, he won't hit it anyway. And that's exactly what happened, he'd just overthrow everything over 10 yards, to "prove" his arm isn't a problem, except that underthrow on the 10 yard pass to I think it was Cotchery that would have been a 1st down. It's really hard to get a running game going in this league when the defense isn't worried about a pass going over 10 yards. I don't see how you blame the WRs, they got open. Coles made some fantastic plays for first downs to make Mr. Pennington look a lot better than he was too.
