Not if they have a 1a or covet someone else that surprisingly becomes available .. anything can happen as we just saw with the Trubisky deal.
That was an awfully expensive trade up for a guy with 13 career starts.....all the tools but...13 starts? that's even less than Sanchez and Sanchez shouldn't have come out...damn, that was expensive .
i'll take it all day since i was clearly right. easy for people to laugh when they are wrong because they have no response
Hopefully SF/JAX takes Watson and we have our choice of an elite player of getting a great trade haul. Lots of talent would slip to us.
i dont understand why they would trade up for a guy who was going to be there at the next pick anyway. it makes absolutely no sense. windy city players look more like the windy city busters in my eyes at this point.
likely becuase they didn't want SF to trade down with someone else who would have taken him like cleveland or even us
This is perfect. We're going to get Fournette/Adams and I couldn't have dreamed either would be on the board.
The 49ers just hoodwinked Chicago..... Got more picks and a better player Sent from my VS987 using Tapatalk
Ditto sucks to be wrong huh? i wouldn't know cleary (and yes i'm acting like an ass, but you get what you give. had you shown a little more class i wouldn't rub it in so much. I'd expect better from a senior member)