So the same play ... is reviewable ... depending on what the call was? That makes no sense. If its a judgment call -- isnt it a judgment call regardless of what the conclusion is?
I don't know if you saw this last play, it was ruled a forceout, and Glenn didn't even get even a foot in bounds as he was in midair, but it was still called a catch and a forceout. Today sucks.
anyone else just see the force out in the dallas game.. these force out plays are going to make me crazy for the rest of this year
Just tellin you... If the Baker TD was ruled a TD. It could of been reviewed by the upstairs crew... The refs ruled Chris Gamble made the INT...Now, had they ruled it incomplete, I don't think it could of been reviewed... Not 100% sure, so don't use me as a factual guy.
Can someone expain this to me really quick. If that had been ruled a TD that still wouldn't have been reviewable because it was a judgement call right?
I don't think that they could have overturned Baker's catch if it was ruled complete because it would still be a judgment call. I didn't see the Chris Gamble play because I'm too pissed to watch TV, so I have no comment on that.
Guys we lost no matter how many times you complain about that call. It isn't going to change so it's going to have to be dealt with.
Not AT ALL overturn the Baker TD...But I do think it could of been reviewed...The call would of been TD, but I do think they could of reviewed it...
No thats not true, its a completely different play. If it was called an incomplete pass it still could have been reviewed because it wasn't a judgement call.
How so? That wouldn't make any sense at all. Either way, it's a matter of judgment. Unless maybe it's considered different because they're challenging the force out, but that still isn't a misinterpretation of rules and still a matter of the judgment if the officials.
You're telling this to fanatic Jets fans and New Yorkers... Good Luck with that. As fans, you HAVE to harp on these. It's perfect message board material...And I bet you Joe Benigno, Jets beat reporters, questions at tomorrows press conference, Jets TV shows...etc. etc. All will be mentioning the call.
They will be, and rightfully so. Honestly, though, if the Jets are as good as the potential playoff team that the media wants to misconstrue them as, it wouldn't have come down to the last play of the game/regulation to end the game/force overtime.
How can you say that it wasn't a judgement call? If a offical thought it was incomplete isn't that his judgement?
If they ruled he was forced out, they could have reviewed if he had possession when he landed, but not whether he came down inbounds.
