You have to value Super Bowls. Marino was a great passer, maybe the best of all time but he didn't lead his team to a trophy. I don't think you can be on the list without winning multiple championships. Bart Starr wasn't half the passer Marino was but he was a better QB.
Agreed about Graham. YPA and YPC are what I've always looked at when evaluating QBs. It's sad seeing current QBs completing 66% with YAC barely into double digits. Namath's numbers in those categories are good indicators of what type of passer he was.
Rodgers looks better and is probably the most talented but the position is so much more than that. At some point his failures in the playoffs need to matter. For example in last years playoffs he did not play well and his ego hurt him when doing things like forcing passes towards Sherman because he wanted to make a point. Brady shredded the same team in crunch time and almost always knows where to go with the ball and is comfortable taking the backseat to the run game if it means a win. I feel that Peyton and Arod could learn something from that
He didn't sheard the same team. Avril, their nickle back (Jermey Lane) were both knocked out of SB and Chancellor was hurt and severly hampered a few days before the superbowl. AR was also playing on a torn calf, when Brady was hurt in a SB he did not look so good himself. I seriously doubt Rodgers is thinking about his ego when he has 300 pounders trying to assault him. Rodgers is just as good as Brady mentally; too many people assume he isn't doing much mentally, because he has the elite physicsl set, but that's simply not true. He manipulates coverages better than anyone in the NFL. I can list countless playoff games where Brady didn't well, but his team was good enough to bail him out. Happens to every QB. I guess it depends on how ,much you value playoff wins and SBS. I don't really care for the, so I'd tske Rodgers over Brady or Manning at his peak fairly easily.
