i meant the boston media. boston media never really appreciated bill russell during his playing career. and russell > wilt
Boston is town filled with racist bigoted drunken jerkoffs. Who cares what they think even though Russell couldn't hold Wilt's jock. _
Other than 2 years, Brady was never the best QB in the league in any other single season. Certainly not over the entirety of his career. That's not domination. Nothing wrong with being merely consistently excellent. _
so brady didn't dominate the league in 2007? he was just excellent? i guess Ali didn't dominate boxing. he went toe to toe with many other greats full 15 rounds. I guess he was just excellent. Brady plays QB, the toughest position in the world Brady has higher winning % than MJ Brady went to 6 SBs in 13 healthy seasons. .46% MJ went to 6 in 15 years - .40% Brady plays football - football has 1 and done format. it's game 7 every time. the best team doesn't always win. MJ plays in a 7 game series. Brady has higher conference winning % than MJ Brady broke all time TD record in the regular season. MJ never broke all time scoring record. Wilt holds that title. Brady has the most playoff wins. MJ doesn't have the most playoff wins Brady has the most playoff TDs. MJ doesn't have the most playoff scoring title Brady has the most SB wins. MJ doesn't have the most championship rings MJ is the GOAT. no doubt. GOAT in all sports. but let's not act like he is 10 times superior than 2nd or 3rd best NBA player. there is a guy named kareem abdul jabbar who also has 6 rings and 6mvps. and russell won 11 rings out of 13. so MJ isn't even consensus in his own sports.
If you don't care, then why did you point out Wilson's record against SB QB's? And if you don't think that the opposing QB dictates how you may play a game, then I don't know what to tell you.
you are entitled to your opinion. in the NFL stats don't make players. NFL has too many variables. you can't just go out there and score 30pts. that's not how NFL works. Brady is no doubt the best QB in this era. peyton is 2nd. brees 3rd. who was the QB of the decade 2000-2010? tom brady. and this decade? so far it's brady. rodgers 2nd. Brady has a chance to be the QB of the decade again if he can win 1 more ring and play till maybe about 2017. that's enough to be considered the QB of the decade. rodgers will definitely challenge him, but he first have to take his team to another SB. luck is definitely in the running. i expect luck to be in the mix with a playoff success. i can look past the stat. anyway, MJ dominated 90's, and 90's only. 80's go to bird & magic.
Brady has been the best QB in most of the seasons of his career, he hasn't been the best fantasy QB but he has done more w/ less than any QB ever.
Stop with this done more with less BS. He has had players that while weren't the best at their position, fit in the best with what the patriots do well. It's not all about talent level, it's how you fit in with the scheme.
Learn to read youngster. He was the best QB in the league in 2 of his 14 years. The rest of the time he was merely an excellent to pretty good QB. He NEVER dominated over any stretch of his career, was never consistently year in and year out the best QB in the league. Them's the facts. Folks up in bean town can imagine some other reality all they want. Joe Louis held the Heavy Weight Championship for 12 straight years. Ali was my favorite boxer of all time but he wasn't Joe Louis. He never dominated like Louis--not when you lose to Joe Frazier and Ken Norton in your prime. _
has never hads the elite talent around him that certain other QBs had. Had 2 seasons of Moss, Gronk and that is it as far as elite talent. That scheme has never done anything w/o him. That HC was a complete failure w/o him. Brady created a dynasty, no Brady no SBs. the 2 title games he lost vs. Manning Manning wouldn't have made the playoffs w/ the talent Brady had around him.
i thought the debate was over. manning is no doubt #1 regular season QB. but again if brady didn't go down in 08, brady most likely would've won back to back mvp that year. and brady went to 4SBs in that period. most reasonable people will take brady over manning for the best QB in 2000s
Nah no elite talent around him.... unless of course you count the 16 pro bowl appearances by guys who have played on the OL that blocks for him. Do they not count?
brady's winning % says hello. brady also dominated 2011 and this year. this year stats don't show because he started slow and ended slow because pats already wrapped up the home field. but it was a dominance in the middle. he was leading the mvp race. but brady isn't a #1 fantasy QB. your definition of dominance and mine are different, i guess. brady dominate you with his brain. he picks you apart with his execution. brady is in team's head all the time. listen to suggs. listen to sherman. listen to ray lewis. brady is team's head. when the D plays pats, brady is what they worry. why? because brady has been dominating the league for so long. again, when you consistently win and a threat to final four every year in the NFL? that's a dominance. in the NFL, you can't win every year. it's not NBA. it's a different type of dominance.
pro bowls don't make players elite and he helps make those OLs look much better being as smart as he is. 2007 and 2008, same 5 guys on the OL 2007 Brady 21 sacks in 578 attempts. 3 PB OL 2008 Cassell 47 sacks in 516 attempts. 0 PB OL same guys on the OL
Elite talent doesn't matter. They have done a great job by utilizing the talent they have had. Elite is such a stupid way to view what the Pats have done. Kevin Faulk, Danny Woodhead and now Shane Vereen have been put into position where they are mismatches for the defenses. Wes Welker, Danny Amendola (who was huge in their latest run) and now Julian Edelman are quick receivers who defeat their coverage with option routes. Do you not get it? The Patriots DON'T NEED ELITE PLAYERS because they find players with certain qualities such as quickness that are added into their scheme. They are masters of this. This notion that scheme has never done anything w/o Brady is also BS. Cassell's best (and only good) seasons were in this system. The best season Kyle Orton ever had was in this system. I know, I know ... they never even won a Playoff game. ... Except that isn't my point. I'm not comparing Brady to these QB's, but those other guys have had success in that system. We'll if the trend continues in Houston with O'Brien,... .I suspect it will. The only reason Brady didn't beat Manning in those two AFCCG's is because he didn't have an elite defense to shut him down. And I literally laughed my ass off at how dumb your comment about Manning not making teh playoffs with the players Brady had. I mean.. .seriously... That may have been the dumbest thing you have literally ever said. It was funny though.
