D-Line going forward

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by GangGreenBlues, Dec 15, 2014.

  1. Clark Gaines

    Clark Gaines Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    1,262
    Likes Received:
    189
    Sounds like a good Nickel defense...
     
  2. kevmvp

    kevmvp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,864
    Likes Received:
    643
    If we switched to the 4-3 why not just let Coples play DE? Simplest solution. Coples/Wilk/Harrison/Richardson with Douzable and even Babin rotating in
     
  3. FJF

    FJF 2018 MVP Joe Namath Award Winner

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    27,721
    Likes Received:
    31,387
    not really, you wouldn't want that personnel group against 3 wr set too often. but the way the league is passing nowadays,smaller faster lb's are going to be the norm. that's why i like alllen in that role
     
  4. Clark Gaines

    Clark Gaines Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    1,262
    Likes Received:
    189
    a nickel defense is basically 5 defensive backs, no? And Allen is a defensive back isn't he?
     
  5. FJF

    FJF 2018 MVP Joe Namath Award Winner

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    27,721
    Likes Received:
    31,387
    if you want to split hairs,yes.but it would not be the defense against 3wr sets that the nickel is used to defense
     
  6. JetLifeLo

    JetLifeLo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2013
    Messages:
    4,606
    Likes Received:
    1,553
    Yeah lets jeopardize our strongest position. Yup. Just like a Jet. I'd agree with the 4-3 switch but i dont agree with trading any of the 3. They all need to be retained, just add one more guy or draft one. The only big signing to the front 7 on D is a pass rushing OLB
     
    Murrell2878 likes this.
  7. Ozymandias

    Ozymandias Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    3,739
    Likes Received:
    1,413
    I would also put a tender on Harrison. If a team gives up a first for him, so be it.
     
  8. Murrell2878

    Murrell2878 Lets go JETS!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    24,461
    Likes Received:
    860
    Thanks for your response.

     
  9. Clark Gaines

    Clark Gaines Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    1,262
    Likes Received:
    189
    I'm not sure I understand what your point is...And, basically, most base offenses have pass catching TEs, so what specific use is your defense it if can't actually defend a 3 WR set?
     
  10. JetLifeLo

    JetLifeLo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2013
    Messages:
    4,606
    Likes Received:
    1,553
    Honestly we could just keep kendrick ellis and bang... we can have any kind of D-line you want.
     
  11. BleedGreen4ever

    BleedGreen4ever Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2007
    Messages:
    736
    Likes Received:
    94
    Why change whats not broken. The true peices in our front 7 that need to be adressed are DE/OLB and I think its time to move on from Harris. Our D-linemen are capable of lining up in a 4-3 or 3-4 as of right now I say keep the hybrid D and get younger and more athletic at OLB and MLB. Randy Gregory would be a great pick if the QBs are gone and could help this defense tremendously. MLB we could address in FA, any idea who is out there?
     
    Axel3419 likes this.
  12. Jonathan_Vilma

    Jonathan_Vilma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    33,302
    Likes Received:
    32,157
    You really can't take a defensive player in the first round unless we deal Wilkerson and get another pick, which would be foolish. There's enough talent on the defense and too much invested to try to go get another defensive lineman (or rush backer) to the point where we can't try to build a super front 4 with all the holes on this team.
     
  13. GangGreenBlues

    GangGreenBlues Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    306
    First round is always BPA for good teams, and that goes triple for really high picks like the one we will have. If Gregory has a chance to potentially be the next Aldon Smith or Von Miller, it would be crazy to reach for a need at that pick. And that's not to mention that pass rushing is still sort of a need for us, we are not terrible at it, but we don't have a guy who consistently scares QBs either.
     
  14. jdon

    jdon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,481
    Likes Received:
    527
    We have some very good players on the DL but I do not see them terrorizing good QBs all that much. I see them getting double teamed to death. This has become a passing league and you need to rush the passer. Good QBs eat up blitzing linebackers. Super Bowl winners invariable do a great job of getting to the QB. I am for a 4-3 that will put our superior talent in more 1 on 1 situations.
     
    GangGreenBlues likes this.
  15. GangGreenBlues

    GangGreenBlues Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    306
    Another reason I want to see 4-3, is that I believe 3-4 is more of a coach's defense and 4-3 is more of a players' defense. In 3-4 there is a lot more emphasis on coaches making creative calls, calling exotic blitzes, and running complex schemes, because with anywhere from 3 to 5 players possibly rushing or dropping back, you have a lot more room for coaching creativity. 4-3 is a simpler defense, with most plays 4 guys rushing upfield, but simpler doesn't necessarily mean worse. I read somewhere Lovie Smith talking about why he loves the 4-3 and he said it's because it lets players focus on doing just one thing, and do it well (that thing being rushing upfield through their one gap to the QB or the RB along the way). In a 3-4, linemen and OLBs have a lot more on their plate, sometimes they have to drop back into coverage depending on the situation, sometimes they have to rush, and the linemen are also often responsible for 2 gaps, so they can't just pin their ears back and rush, and abandon another gap.

    Maybe it's just backlash from having Rex as the HC for 6 years, but I am tired of all the complex stuff on defense. Neither Rex's nor Rob's defenses are doing that well right now in the NFL, and think this overcomplicated approach might be part of the problem. These systems might work well with a certain type of experienced veteran player, but for lots of players, they make them think too much, whether it's the DBs thinking about what they are supposed to be doing and not being able to intercept the ball, or the front seven having too many responsibilities which prevents guys like Richardson, Wilkerson, Coples from just roaring upfield constantly and doing what they do best.
     
    PutJerrichoIn likes this.
  16. Murrell2878

    Murrell2878 Lets go JETS!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    24,461
    Likes Received:
    860
    I just want to bump this thread because this is a quality topic amongst a lot of nonsense. This is good football talk and hopefully there will be new contributors to this conversation. Let's get more X's & O's type conversations on here
     
    Axel3419 and FJF like this.
  17. Clark Gaines

    Clark Gaines Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    1,262
    Likes Received:
    189
    This WAS an excellent post...

    I agree with the second paragraph very much. I think Rex way overthinks defense, as if he's enamored with the notion of his genius. I think the Jets have the building blocks for a great defense. They just have neglected the second level (LBs). IMO, the Jets basically do play a 4-3. Coples is a DE trying to play LB and it's limited his effectiveness. Sure, he can do it, but not as well as he probably would playing DE. He's simply not fast or nimble enough to play LB consistently well. Maybe part of that is his own inconsistency, that is, maybe he'd be just as inconsistent on the DL. But I think we'd see more from him if he were playing his natural position. But, hey, it's not a terrible thing to have a Coples at LB if you had a real playmaker at OLB playing on the other side. Pace nor Babin are that caliber player.

    And that's why I'm torn about the 1st round draft pick. I'd like to see the Jets scoop up a difference maker for that OLB spot. But I'd also like them to draft Amari Cooper, WR. I know that the Jets have drafted defense-first for forever. But the defense still seems incomplete. And, to be honest, I think I'd rather they complete that unit with a real OLB than go for a WR, especially if they haven't fully addressed the interior OL positions significantly.
     
  18. legler82

    legler82 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    13,265
    Likes Received:
    7,166
    I'm not a fan of the 4-3 front but I do agree that it's the scheme that would maximize the talents of our most talented players. My approach would be as follows:

    1. Attempt to trade Wilkerson for a 1st round pick
    I love Wilkerson but love Richardson more. If I have to tie up a big chunk of cap space on an interior defensive lineman, it would be the latter not the former. As great as Richardson has been, I think he would all world as a 3 technique. If I can't get a first for Mo, I would use Wilkerson inside next to Richardson similar to how Detroit lines up Suh and Fairley inside. Mo and Sheldon can interchange between the 1 and 3 techniques.

    2. Offer Snacks a 2nd round tender with the hopes someone bites. Snacks has been great, but he is replaceable. If no one bites, then we have him at a more than reasonable price. I'd also resign Ellis.

    3. Sign a Greg Hardy. I'd rather sign an accomplished edge rusher than take a chance with a pick. With quality of players he'd have playing along side him, Hardy should easily amass double digit sacks every year here.

    My 4 would be Coples, Rich, Snacks/Ellis and Hardy.
     
    GangGreenBlues likes this.
  19. GangGreenBlues

    GangGreenBlues Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    306
    One interesting thing lately has been IK Enempali. He constantly made plays for us in the preseason, but then was pretty much forgotten during the regular season games until last week. But once he got some playing time, he was right back to making plays. A sack that was wiped off due to a penalty, a couple of batted down passes, almost an interception. Now it is the Titans, but still, it says something when a guy is constantly making plays. Would like to see him play more the final two games. Seems almost like the opposite of Coples, good motor and intangibles but without the physical gifts.

    I know people are weary after years of defensive picks in the first round, and Cooper seems like a sure thing at WR, but for me, it's not even close. You just don' t see elite WRs make much of an impact in the NFL in terms of the team success. Most of the great WRs play on the shittiest teams, and those teams never seem to get better. Elite pass rushers, on the other hand, have a tremendous impact. So in the top 5-10 picks, I would definitely consider pass rushers way before WRs.
     
  20. Murrell2878

    Murrell2878 Lets go JETS!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    24,461
    Likes Received:
    860
    Elite Pass Rushers / or Great Defensive pressure. Both can be accomplished. We haven't had an elite PR since J. Abe, but I believe with the proper personnel we can get elite pass rush from the DL. Also, I believe Richardson can be an elite Pass Rusher. I truly believe that.
     

Share This Page