Klecko Says Jets Are Out Position: Also Cimini Article on 3-4.

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by EcKo151, Sep 20, 2006.

  1. EcKo151

    EcKo151 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,374
    Likes Received:
    9
    Joe Klecko is currently on the Joe Benigno show and i'm listening...Also is an artice from the Daily News by Rich Cimini...

    Says Jonathan Vilma is out of position being in the 3-4. The team is not playing to their strength, saying you need big guys to play a 3-4. Saying Robertson is very quick getting off the ball and would be better playing right on the nose in a 4-3. Says the Jets should play to their strength.

    http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/jets/story/454073p-382153c.html
     
  2. Denny

    Denny Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,458
    Likes Received:
    10
    Moore doesn't get much penetration if any from what I saw from the Pats game, BUT, he rarely gave up ground and the Pats runners had to go left or right. Robertson always looks like he getting bent over backwards while trying to hold his ground. Most times he's getting bowled over. I think Mangini likes his spunk but I can't see why he would like him for any more than that. Moore should be getting more downs. They won't be losing much in the pass rush anyway?!

    Then again, a 4-3 mix would be nice too.
     
  3. gustoonarmy

    gustoonarmy 2006-2007 TGG.com Best International Poster of the

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,174
    Likes Received:
    160
    Well we know all that. Instead of gradually bringing it in (3-4) hes laid his stall out from the start and obviously there are going to be personnel problems.
    I happen to think that Vilma will never come to terms with the 3-4 and because of his smaller size has to play in the 4-3 or 4-6 system.
     
  4. EcKo151

    EcKo151 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,374
    Likes Received:
    9
    Well, what has made Donnie Edwards so successful in a 3-4 defense at San Diego, despite being smaller than Vilma? Obviously a big key is Jamal Williams, an excellent NT, but if the Jets can find a good NT to plug in there, is their a reason why Vilma can't succeed in a 3-4?

    Vilma has big LBs around him, none are below 245 pounds, solid DEs who know the 3-4...But the catalyst is the NT, and until the Jets can adress that and find someone who can occupy 2 blockers(Rashad Moore!) then Vilma will struggle for the most part...But despite his transition being rough, he still gets his tackles.
     
  5. IrishSteveZ

    IrishSteveZ New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    Messages:
    5,729
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've been saying that since DAY 1, this defense isn't fit for the 3-4. So why the hell are we running it? We have way too many peices that don't fit into place.
     
  6. MSUJet85

    MSUJet85 ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Messages:
    12,804
    Likes Received:
    238
    Well the problem with the 4-3 is that we lack a pass rusher, if Moore can step it up and become a starter, we won't look nearly as bad in a 3-4 defense
     
  7. gustoonarmy

    gustoonarmy 2006-2007 TGG.com Best International Poster of the

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,174
    Likes Received:
    160
    Yes. Moore has so far done an OK job.The pats couldnt run through the middle with him there , although he wasn't penetrative enough.
    Vilma is an intelligent player who will understand whats expected of him , and unless as you have said we can find the personnel around him , he will continue to be ineffective.
    I just hope we start with Moore in there against the Bills. Which will mean that either DRob or Ellis missing out.

    damned if we do damned if we don't
     
  8. BrowningNagle

    BrowningNagle Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    29,426
    Likes Received:
    30,623
    i like the 3-4 more, back when Herm came and we switched to the 4-3 I was angry, I think the 3-4 is more effective in the NFL. Also its easier to have 4 good linebackers on a team than 2 good defensive tackles. There are scads and scads of decent linebackers in the league, but DT's are hard to come by, thats why you always see DTs drafted early on in drafts, even if they aren't outstanding players (D-rob anyone?).

    Bottom line, I dont care if the 3-4 struggles this year, and I dont think Mangini does either. In a year or 2, when D-Rob is gone and we add a decent huge guy to man the nose, our front 7 could be one hell of a force!
     
  9. GreenHornet

    GreenHornet New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,380
    Likes Received:
    1
    We are only 1-1 and just lost oiur first game which we had a shot at winning. I do not think there is enough evidence yet to throw the 3-4 out of the window. If we go 1-2 and then 1-3 and appears it is because of sticking to the 3-4 then there is cause for argument.
     
  10. TheCoolerGlennFoley

    TheCoolerGlennFoley Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    2,376
    Likes Received:
    32
    Five of the last six Super Bowl champions have played the 3-4. It's obvious that's what Mangini wants to run. And we're better off struggling a bit this year without the best personel and making that offseason priority 1 then playing a 4-3 this year and having to switch next year. Remember this is a long term project. And we did hold New England to 7 points in the 2nd half. Just the media feeling they've been too positive about a 1-1 team.
     
  11. Italian Seafood

    Italian Seafood New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    12,545
    Likes Received:
    3
    The ideal way to go is to be able to use either one and change it up to confuse the opponent, like the Pats did on Sunday.
     
  12. jilozzo

    jilozzo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    8,264
    Likes Received:
    2,668
    WHY is everyone still harping on it??? we all knew when EM was hired that we did not have the horses to run the 3-4. but it was implemented anyway and some players will adapt and some won't - those that cannot will NOT be here next year and i do believe the jets will address the front seven of the defense heavily next offseason....

    along with the RB and WR positions.

    i heard that klecko spot in my car and man it brings back memories - one of the best teams in history that did not at least make it to the SB. flat out said the reason was coaching and organizational issues.

    man they had talent on both sides of the ball

    jil
     
  13. fenwyr

    fenwyr Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    0
    My thoughts exactly. The Pats were in a 4-3 more often than not on Sunday. We need to be able to make that switch when the 3-4 is not working. I still do prefer the 3-4 though.
     
  14. EcKo151

    EcKo151 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,374
    Likes Received:
    9
    I'm for the 3-4 defense don't get me wrong. Alot of players will be sticking in 07', minus Von Oelhoffen, possibly Victor Hobson and I doubt Robertson will be a sticking point in the 3-4. So for the most part, alot of the same defenders will be on this team, while the Jets will have to adress a NT, a blitzing LB and more depth on the DLine...

    Might as well go through your growing pains with the 3-4 now since the Jets aren't going to the playoffs, get the guys who will be here next season to know and understand the defensive scheme, and like I said, plug in the problems on the defense via free agency or the draft.
     
  15. Tight

    Tight Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    Messages:
    2,868
    Likes Received:
    0
    The funny thing is vilma hasnt been that bad. Hes still a ball hog. Were cool.
     
  16. BomberJet

    BomberJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2002
    Messages:
    2,113
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    FWIW, I reran the game at the most critical part - which was when the PATS had the ball at 9:20 of the 4th Quarter and managed to run down the clock to
    1:15 before the blocked FG

    Jet D could not make the big play when called upon. Many were 3rd down and 5+ which Brady was able to over come with short outs and passes underneath to WRs just beyond the sticks.

    Very impressed with Brady's decision making. He knew what to do and when to take control. Facing a calibre like TB, any team would have a tough time of it. Jets D couldn't step it up to make the big play, plain and simple. Absolutely no pressure on the QB!

    All said and done, when R. Moore was in, an immediate improvement in the run D was very noticeable. D. Rob was constantly being pushed back or pancaked whenever a run took place.

    If the Jets have no QB pressure using the 3/4, and can't stop the run w/D.Rob, whats to lose going to the 4/3?

    If Mangini wants to make this season meaningfull, he has to make some adjustments, otherwise, expect more of this swiss cheese D.
     
  17. gustoonarmy

    gustoonarmy 2006-2007 TGG.com Best International Poster of the

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,174
    Likes Received:
    160

    Thats exactley it! Adapt. I have visions of Belichick with his note pad and pencil quietley pondering before a game with his game plan set , then just before the game changing his mind and going with something else. This is what makes the Pats D so good , you don't know what your going to get and as said previous its 2 games in lets wait and see. Personaly if it doesn't work this season just put it down to teething problems.
     
  18. Slagan7

    Slagan7 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    5
    Uhm, three of those teams happen to be the patriots, So I don't think that arguement really goes far. (The other one was Pitts, and ravens, and tampa being 4-3).
     
  19. SOWELLisGOD

    SOWELLisGOD New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    2,689
    Likes Received:
    0
    and by hall hog, do you mean ball hawk?

    but anyways, i agree with klecko, i feel like vilma needs better protection up front to use his speed, cause lets face it, he is undersized
     
  20. Serphnx

    Serphnx New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,863
    Likes Received:
    0
    Size isn't necessarily what makes players suited for one system or the other, it just so happens that the bigger players have traditionally been better in the 3-4, but they've also traditionally been better in the 4-3 as well. As mentioned by someone else in this thread, San Diego runs the 3-4 with a small LB as well. We need a true NT. Look at how even Ray Lewis suffered without having a true NT last year, and look at how he's upped his level already again this year. It's not the system that makes the player, great players will succeed in any system. You're going to see Vilma really excel in the 3-4 once we get a better NT in front of him (*cough get rid of DFat cough*). The 3-4 generally allows an MLB greater freedom and lets them take over games more. Personally, I'm really eagerly anticipating what Vilma can do in the 3-4. I have a hunch that he's going to turn into an absolute monster. I have a real good feeling on Vilma. I honestly think that next year, if we can get a true NT in, if Vilma can grow enough, he could just be that one player on D that takes us to the elite level.
     

Share This Page