Who's worse? Raiders or Packers

Discussion in 'National Football League' started by luvdemjets1998, Sep 12, 2006.

?

Who's worse?

Poll closed Sep 22, 2006.
  1. Packers

    21 vote(s)
    30.4%
  2. Raiders

    44 vote(s)
    63.8%
  3. Neither (post your choice below)

    4 vote(s)
    5.8%
  1. luvdemjets1998

    luvdemjets1998 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    0
    Both these team's week 1 performance was just awful. Which one of them will have the 1st pick in the 2007 draft?
     
  2. ViLMaNiaC51

    ViLMaNiaC51 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    0
    why did you make this twice?
     
  3. mj2sexay

    mj2sexay Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,620
    Likes Received:
    8
    They both look terrible. Over the long run I really think with the inept coaching staff and terrible defense the Packers will be THE WORST team in the national football league.
     
  4. SOWELLisGOD

    SOWELLisGOD New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    2,689
    Likes Received:
    0
    im thinking the packers, but oakland looked just horrid last night
     
  5. -MC-

    -MC- Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    2,241
    Likes Received:
    0
    alot of people think were gonna get #1....
     
  6. Dinobot 2

    Dinobot 2 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    19,335
    Likes Received:
    1
    Raiders. That team is shit.
     
  7. Mickey Shuler 82

    Mickey Shuler 82 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,324
    Likes Received:
    1
    Raiders. They're both horrible on the field, but Raiders because they have a bunch of ass clowns on their roster and are not investing in the future with some really green rookies like the Packers are currently.

    I like that we play both this year (granted, at Lambeau vs. the Pack). These two games alone will get us toward at least matching last year's 4-12 record as a starting point.
     
  8. Mario

    Mario Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,005
    Likes Received:
    410
    I am just happy we play both.

    Buffalo, Detriot, Houston and the Raiders at home, and at Green bay should give us 5 wins.
    If we can manage 3-7 or 4-6 vs everyone else we will be atleast 9-7
     
  9. Uhm a Jets Fan

    Uhm a Jets Fan New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    0
    The best part is we play both of them
     
  10. Uhm a Jets Fan

    Uhm a Jets Fan New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    0
    o nvm someone said that
     
  11. Mexican Buc

    Mexican Buc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,471
    Likes Received:
    39
    Pack. Raiders atleast have a few bright spots with LJ, Moss, and future-star rookie Huff. Pack ain't got anything short of Favre who can't get it done alone anymore. Their Huff is 50 yrs old in Woodson. Gado was one of the few bright points and they traded him away.

    Raiders are most messed up, cap wise and such. But they are closer to comming back than the Pack are.
     
  12. OhioJetsFan

    OhioJetsFan Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    620
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Packers are worse... and I'm even a big fan of Favre.
     
  13. boomer

    boomer Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,925
    Likes Received:
    0
    Haha I love this poll. :raiders:
     
  14. xjets2002x

    xjets2002x Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,814
    Likes Received:
    17
    This poll isn't difficult.

    The Raiders are worse.

    Warren Sapp should have retired two years ago. Neither Randy Moss or Joey Porter wants to be there. They had to take Aaron Brooks out because they feared for his safety. At least the Packers are a "team."

    -X-
     
  15. Cinvis

    Cinvis New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    1,403
    Likes Received:
    0
    Neither...

    The 2 worst teams played each other last weekend and ...

    The Browns lost, so I guess they take it for now, but look for the Saints to still be the worst at the end of the year.
     
  16. xjets2002x

    xjets2002x Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,814
    Likes Received:
    17
    I think that's wholly untrue.

    While the Browns might be bad, Oakland is, by and large, a train wreck, specifically because they've invested so much bad money in offense and have to rely on rookies and has-beens at most spots.

    The Saints have TWO quality backs and a solid quarterback in Brees. While I don't believe Sean Payton will make any kind of a head coach, he DOES have some worthwhile weapons to work with.

    -X-
     
  17. gustoonarmy

    gustoonarmy 2006-2007 TGG.com Best International Poster of the

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,174
    Likes Received:
    160
    I haven't seen the Raiders and refuse to believe that after watching the Pack that any team is worse. Bet Bretts glad to be back :lol:
     
  18. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    Packers have AJ Hawk, Woodson isn't even 30 yet.

    If Woodson is 50, I suppose Derrick Brooks and Ronde Barber definitely are senior citizens.
     
  19. EcKo151

    EcKo151 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,374
    Likes Received:
    9
    Anyone notice how Jeaux or NJRaider have suddenly disappeared?

    Art Shell...Commitment To Excellence.
     
  20. BIG COUNTRY

    BIG COUNTRY Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,927
    Likes Received:
    30
    Yeah he dissapeared last year after we beat them. He never owns up.
     

Share This Page