Release Blaylock now!

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by tomdeb, Sep 10, 2006.

  1. AlioTheFool

    AlioTheFool Spiveymaniac

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    13,601
    Likes Received:
    0
    Our OLine had a lot to do with the poor running game today. Blaylock is not the answer, but in all fairness, we all knew that, and chances are, Mangini did too.

    It is possible that Barlow was purposely kept out of the game most of the time so that NE cannot gameplan against us. We are going to need a strong running game next week to beat the Pats.

    I agree with JI2004 and winston. The run was used today solely to set up Penny to pass. The D had to respect the run, regardless of its success. Plus, it set up the play fake, which has always been one of Penny's strengths.

    Barlow should get most of the reps in practice this week. It will be interesting to see, that's for sure.

    And letting Penny audible at the LOS was GENIUS! Chad has one of the best set of D-reading eyes in the NFL, if not the best. Letting him pick his own plays, plus give him SIGNS to "audible" in the loud stadium worked like a charm. Kudos to Mangini for blasting the music in TC.
     
  2. IrishSteveZ

    IrishSteveZ New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    Messages:
    5,729
    Likes Received:
    0
    Houston deserves a shot, come on Mangini....
     
  3. AlioTheFool

    AlioTheFool Spiveymaniac

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    13,601
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't see why. He is as undersized as Blaylock, and doesn't do anything more with the opportunites he gets.

    Barlow is the only guy whose name isn't Curtis Martin, that is currently on the roster, that has a chance of being a true full-time RB.
     
  4. RedWhiteBlue&Green

    RedWhiteBlue&Green Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don't think Blaylock is an NFL running back. I think Barlow showed us that he is, and that cutting one of our guys is not going to harm us. I wouldn't mind at all, if the Jets cut Blaylock. Houston did well last season, and he did well in the preseason. I think Barlow/Houston may be a great combo. But certainly, it looks like Barlow is at least a real running back. I'm sad that we don't have Martin or Jordan, but I'm happy we have something that seems decent if not more.
     
  5. PJ4Ever

    PJ4Ever Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2004
    Messages:
    3,212
    Likes Received:
    1,327
    Blaylock is the most hesitant, tentative running back I've EVER seen. Seriously, he never hits the goddamn holes.
     
  6. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    53,295
    Likes Received:
    25,465
    I didn't think much of Blaylock today, but he has something to offer and it would cost more to cut him. He needs to be relegated to a backup role, not even bringing in competition will get this guy performing like a starter.
     
  7. BadgerOnLSD

    BadgerOnLSD Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2004
    Messages:
    15,188
    Likes Received:
    3
    You forgot about the part where we got Houston with that trade, as well as Rhodes.
     
    #27 BadgerOnLSD, Sep 10, 2006
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2006
  8. MawaesDaMan

    MawaesDaMan New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2004
    Messages:
    562
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am not a fan of Blaylock. I liked what i saw from Barlow, but I would really like to see a few touches by Houston and Washington going forward. Blaylock must have impressed in camp, but in games, he just doesnt do it for me. No real threat of breaking a long one, and he seems hesitatnt to me and it will only be a matter of time before he is hurt, he lowers his head when he doesnt need to. I liek a bruising back, but they have to be a bruiser, Blaylock is built like a scat and thinks he is a bruiser. I am not impressed.
     
  9. DariusVassell

    DariusVassell Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    164
    Likes Received:
    0
    Blaylock is just a third down back..Barlow will be the full time starter once he is up to speed with schotts playbook....Barlow impressed yesterday

    Actually Tenn's run d is pretty stout and better teams than us will have problems running on them
     
  10. JetsIn2004

    JetsIn2004 Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    11,912
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree Barlow is better than Blaylock running the ball, and Blaylock could be effective on 3rd down. I also agree, Tennessee has 2 big time DTs, and they s howed it yesterday in their run defense. I do not think Blaylock was to blame for the bad running.... Barlow is a better runner, but even if he was in there the entire game, we wouldn't have all of a sudden run for 200+ (I know you're not saying that, just making a point)
     
  11. DariusVassell

    DariusVassell Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    164
    Likes Received:
    0
    Your'e absolutely right...it was a really good test for Mangold yesterday against a premier tackle like Haynesworth and i thought he did really well...the running game will come
     
  12. LWC611

    LWC611 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    863
    Likes Received:
    23
    Does anyone know why Houston was inactive yesterday?
     
  13. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    I don't know if we'll ever hear the reason from the coaching staff, but I betcha it was due to the fact he fumbled twice against the Eagles.
     
  14. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    Yeah the problem with Blaylock is a lack of decisiveness and elusiveness. He never makes anything out of nothing and he rarely manages to get plus yards when the hole is small or fleeting.

    He is the kind of back who would never get more than a couple of yards unless he was used almost exclusively on draws on passing downs. That's why he excelled as KC's 3rd down back when Priest Holmes was the mainstay. The Jets need to get him back into that role in their offense if he's going to do anything for us.

    He's probably the worst 1st and 2nd down back the Jets have used in 15 years.
     
  15. baamf

    baamf Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Messages:
    3,989
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen......
     
  16. LWC611

    LWC611 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    863
    Likes Received:
    23

    You are probably right on both points. Thanks.
     
  17. tomdeb

    tomdeb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,508
    Likes Received:
    3,263
    If you like a back like Blaylock that dances instead of hitting the hole, keep pushing Blaylock. Houston ran with much more authority. Blaylock is a 3rd down back AT BEST and Leon Washington has more speed and power.
     
  18. RedWhiteBlue&Green

    RedWhiteBlue&Green Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    1
    Blaylock has been in this league long enough for everyone to know what he's capable of... which isn't all that much. Barlow has been an effective back, and I think he can only get better. We don't really know what Houston or Washington are capable of. It could be that one of them could be a gem. Your name doesn't have to be Bush to be great (only if you're looking to be Governor or President :) But I'm very relieved we have Barlow. At the least, he is a decent NFL back.
     
  19. SOWELLisGOD

    SOWELLisGOD New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    2,689
    Likes Received:
    0
    release him? cmon now

    i think he can be a great 3rd down back...hell he scored 4 TDs in one game with the chiefs
     
  20. Cakes

    Cakes Mr. Knowledge 2010

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    20,810
    Likes Received:
    232
    Can I get a "Whoa Bundy"?
     

Share This Page