When did I say they didn't deserve to win? I don't even understand what you guys are arguing with me about! My original post said that niners were LUCKY and very fortunate to get back into the game. When you get back to back possessions starting at your own 30 there is a certain element of luck involved. It's not like having to orchestrate a drive from your own 20 and go the length of the field. It sounds to me like some of you guys lost money betting on the niners and are really bitter about it. :lol: Stop nitpicking my posts and attributing meaning beyond what I said. I said that one play doesn't win or lose a game, which is absolutely true, and I got ambushed over it. Jeebus!
It's absolutely false. One play can, and often does, win or lose a game. Saying a team could've played better and not had it come down to that play doesn't change the fact that one play often wins or loses a game. You got ambushed because you made a demonstrably false statement.
It is your stupid argument about gift wrap when you are completely blinded to Ravens getting even more "luck" too. Heck, they scored more points, so therefore by your own logic then they must have gotten more lucky breaks. In fact, when you get back to back non-holding calls on the last drive that help the defense hold up at their 5 yard like that is outrageous luck and gift wrapped by officials, no? Point is that seem to elude you and other is that these so called "lucky" breaks going both ways during the course of the game. ... It is your dumb lack of substance arguments that warranted a response. No, didn't bet on the game, never bet on games, too much on stock market already - stock "games" that is much easier to predict. Just calling the way I see it.
