Jets -3.5, Greene goes down at the 1

Yes, because when they Patriots are up by 21 points, they pile on because they are concerned about beating the 7 point spread.....

 

What a terrible post.

 

you mean minus 3.5.

 

It turned out whoever took the Jets on that line were lucky the offense scored at all.

 

What a stupid post. This weird way to twist the point spread into an anti-BB or anti-Pats topic makes me wonder if this forum needs some kind of education requirement.

 

That would eliminate half of the posters, so it's not feasible.

 

anyone who bets on the jets to begin with is a moron

 

Coaches play to win the game. They don't care about beating spreads lol. Greene learned from his mistake in the 2010 playoff game when he should have slid and gone down at the one. Greene didn't make the same mistake twice and he's been pretty decent as of late. You can guarantee he's back next year at a decent price. Looks like he's finally starting to get it. He's making cuts and changing direction instead of just plowing forward. He's improving his game.

 

with the jets, you take the under.

 

One would think if you place a bet you would know the difference between "+" and "-". lol

 

Best post ever

 

jees, if you are refering to the last blow out, what did you expect them to do with around 3 quarters left, run on every down?

 

With the Jets, you take the Texans.

 

I never comment on threads. but this thread is an epic fail.

OP is clueless.

http://forums.theganggreen.com/showthread.php?t=60181

shut it down mods

hmy:hmy:hmy:

 

I bet on the Jets every week.... to lose.

 

suckchise told green to go down so McElroy's stats wouldn't look too much better than his. 3 picks look at lot worse after a guy who took NO snaps with the starters all week long puts up 2 TDs in a real game.
" mark had a really good week in practice" - what a crock!

 

This comes with the territory when you gamble on a game.