Are we going to be in salary cap hell in 2013?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Mambo9, Nov 20, 2012.

  1. FJF

    FJF 2018 MVP Joe Namath Award Winner

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    27,721
    Likes Received:
    31,387
    ducasse and howard will be penciled in as the rg and rt

    so really thats $33 mil for 4 postions.it's not bad at all. they could even make a run at cliff avril if they wanted to. and dedicate the draft to the offense
     
  2. Jets n Boys

    Jets n Boys Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    0
    From what I understand, Holmes 2013 contract is fully guaranteed. Which means he will make every dollar of the contract, be it from the Jets or another team. If Jets release him, he will still get his entire money, so ZERO savings if cut. But if traded, his base salary ($11 mil) gets pushed to the other team. Thats the money Jets will save in trading him. nyjetscap.com has always shown 1.25 mil saving if cut, but I think thats inaccurate as Jets have guaranteed Holmes workout bonus and roster bonus (if any) as well.

    Im in favor of trading him away for a conditional third day pick just to get his contract off the books. New team gets him for $11 mil in 2013 (guaranteed), $8.25 mil in 2014 and $6.5 mil in 2015, all with ZERO dead money.

    EDIT: Holmes cap saving if traded is actually $11 mil (his base salary in 2013), not $7.75 mil (that was this year's base salary, my mistake).
     
  3. Jets n Boys

    Jets n Boys Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    0
    What you are saying is absolutely true. All the backloaded contracts, from 2011 (Holmes, Cromartie, Harris, Sanchez, D'Brick...). However, most of these contracts will be off the books by 2014 or 2015.

    The trick to this scenario is to spend smartly. Not over pay for players and not sign players in their late 20s to longer than 2-3 year contracts. Also, to sustain a solid team, Jets really need to hit the draft boards and draft a few pro bowlers. The last pro bowler Jets had was from the 2007 draft, Revis and Harris. So it's time we start drafting well. We do need help in the immediate future so either we go in to rebuilding mode next year and not sign any big FA, or we sign a couple of good LBs or OLs and develop the rest via draft. I doubt Jets will ever go in to rebuilding mode. Fans can not take that and the owner isn't in a position to do so either.
     
  4. Jets n Boys

    Jets n Boys Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    0
    I hope Howard isn't penciled down as a starter. I hope we either draft a RT or sign a decent FA. Howard is good for depth and thats it.
     
  5. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    Good points. And yeah we need more than a solid draft, we need an outstanding one
     
  6. DuhesSeaOfMud

    DuhesSeaOfMud Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2012
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    18
    Nobody will take Holmes at that salary.
     
  7. dmw

    dmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2010
    Messages:
    2,862
    Likes Received:
    2,429
    Agreed. Tannenbaum has to go. He's failed big time. He makes MANY poor decisions. It's not even close. He should be fired.
     
  8. dmw

    dmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2010
    Messages:
    2,862
    Likes Received:
    2,429
    The talent on the field is poor all around except for a few players. Call it whatever you want: rebuilding or something else, but the Jets need improvements in many areas.
     
  9. Professor Frink

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    387
    Likes Received:
    0
    I understand the thinking, but I don't think that's their best option. Considering he has $11M guaranteed on his contract, and he is coming off a major injury, his value is about as low as it could be. I've never been a big proponent of selling low. I think it would make more sense to bite the bullet and pay him next year. The hope would be that he comes back and has a good year in 2013. After that his contract gets more reasonable and you might actually be able to get a mid-round pick (or two) for him. Doesn't that sound like a better deal?
     
  10. Br4d

    Br4d 2018 Weeb Ewbank Award

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    36,670
    Likes Received:
    14,472
    If you'd had him in your locker room for the last two years you wouldn't want him back either.

    Any move the Jets make to ditch Holmes is addition by subtraction.

    I'd trade a 5th round pick AND Holmes for nothing just to get rid of his cap number for next year and give the Jets some maneuverability. That'd beat the value the Jets have been getting lately with their trade-ups.
     
  11. JetRizing89

    JetRizing89 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,012
    Likes Received:
    60
    i really hope we dont waste valueable cap room on dustin kellers sorry ass

    he had a great run with favre 5 seasons ago and has not done jack shit since
     
  12. Professor Frink

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    387
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's probably a moot point, I doubt any team is gonna wanna pay him $11M next year, even if it only costs a conditional late round pick. But, hypothetically, even if there was a team interested, I think the Jets would be better off holding onto him.

    Even if they get the precious cap space, it's not gonna help them much in 2013. There are too many holes on this team to fix in one offseason, and it's not like all the answers are in free agency. The $11M they would save is gonna give them a bit more flexibility, but how much is it gonna help them in the long run? IMHO, not a whole lot, at least not as much as the kind of haul you might be able to get from waiting a year to trade Holmes.

    Look, there isn't a right or wrong answer to this kind of thing, it ultimately comes down to a philosophical perspective of what you're willing to gamble. I'm just saying, given Holmes' contract and health status, his value couldn't get much lower then it currently is. If I were running an NFL team, and lord knows no one is calling me for GM vacancies, I would be hesitant to get rid of a commodity at it's lowest value.

    Just a little food for thought.
     

Share This Page