Leftwich is out vs. Cleveland

Discussion in 'National Football League' started by Yisman, Nov 19, 2012.

  1. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    So I guess Charlie Batch will start.
     
  2. Harpua

    Harpua Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    8,791
    Likes Received:
    2,311
    Wow, sucks for the steelers. Good thing all their rb's are finally healthy.
     
  3. tubby

    tubby Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2009
    Messages:
    658
    Likes Received:
    130
    Would love to see Cleveland and Buffalo win this week to bring the Steelers and Colts one step closer to the pack.
     
  4. allan1

    allan1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    8,840
    Likes Received:
    14
    Cleveland should be mega pissed after the Dallas debacle. With Pitt down to Qb#3...if there was ever a time to pick of the Steelers it's now
     
  5. displacedfan

    displacedfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    13,737
    Likes Received:
    595
    Charlie Batch! I love watching him for some reason.
     
  6. Diddy

    Diddy Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    2,254
    Likes Received:
    7
    He is a QBR beast, seriously the Steelers need to sign Vince Young.
     
  7. CJLang

    CJLang Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    5,497
    Likes Received:
    549
    He probably should have been in for the 2nd half of last night's game.

    It was clear to anyone with eyes that Leftwich was hurting, and hurting the team by being in there.
     
  8. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    ^ I assume you mean out

    and yeah he was obviously injured, poor job by the Pitt coaching staff.
     
  9. CJLang

    CJLang Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    5,497
    Likes Received:
    549
    I meant Batch should have been "in"
     

Share This Page